Is Patronage Dead?: The Impact of Antipatronage Staffing Systems

Review of Public Personnel Administration

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 3-26

  Hamilton, David K ^a  

^a ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993767718     PISSN: 0734371X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734371X0202200101     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adrian, C. R. (1961). Governing urban America (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Workers. (1982, November). Profile of city of Chicago as employer of men and women. Chicago: Author.
3. Barrett, K., & Greene, R. (2000). Grading the cities: A management report. Governing, 13, 22-91.
4. Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Becker, R. (1999, October 3). Stroger the one to see about a job. Chicago Tribune, S1, p. 1.
6. Bowman, C. G. (1991). We don’t want anybody anybody sent: The death of patronage hiring in Chicago. Northwestern University Law Review, 86, 57-95.
7. Bowman, C. G. (1996). The law of patronage at a crossroads. Journal of Law and Politics, 12, 341-363.
8. Bozeman, B., & Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 58, 109-118.
9. Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507 (1980).
10. Briggs, M. (1996, February 20). Edgar: Bring back patronage. Chicago Sun-Times, p.1.
11. Brune, T., & Halperin, J. (1996). Patronage lite. Illinois Issues, 22(10), 12-21.
12. Census Bureau. (n.d). 1990 census of population and housing summary tape file 3-A. Washington, DC: U.S. Commerce Department.
13. City of Chicago. (1975). EEO-4 reports. Chicago: Department of Personnel.
14. City of Chicago. (1985, December). Task force on affirmative action report. Chicago: Author.
15. City of Chicago. (1986, August 10). Detailed hiring provisions for compliance with the Shakman judgement. Chicago: Author.
16. City of Chicago. (1997). EEO-4 reports. Chicago: Department of Personnel.
17. City of Chicago. (1999). Workforce highlights. Chicago: Department of Personnel.
18. Cook County. (1999). EEO-4 reports. Chicago: Author.
19. Elrod v. Burns, et al, 427 U.S. 347 350-51 (1976).
20. Freedman, A. (1988). Doing battle with the patronage army: Politics, courts and personnel administration in Chicago. Public Administration Review, 48, 847-859.
21. Freedman, A. (1994a). Commentary on patronage. Public Administration Review, 54, 313.
22. Freedman, A. (1994b). Patronage: An American tradition. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
23. Gaines, W., & Secter, B. (1999, February 9). Family cashes in on clout. Chicago Tribune, S1, p. 1.
24. Gibson, R. (2000, March 29). Ryan developer friend nets a lease windfall. Chicago Tribune, S1, p. 1.
25. Gore, A. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less (Report of the National Performance Review). New York: Times Books.
26. Hamilton, D. K. (1992). Staffing the Illinois public service after Rutan. In S. Gove (Ed.), The Illinois public service: Problems and perspectives 53-67). Dekalb: Northern Illinois University, Division of Public Administration.
27. Hamilton, D. K. (1993). The staffing function in Illinois state government after Rutan. Public Administration Review, 53, 381-386.
28. Hamilton, D. K. (1999). The continuing judicial assault on patronage. Public Administration Review, 59, 54-62.
29. Heard, J., & Thorton, J. (1997, May 5). Daley stands by call to promote on merit. Chicago Tribune, S2, p. 1.
30. Illinois Commission on the Future of the Public Service. (1991a). The best and the brightest in Chicago public service: Research and recommendations. Chicago: Chicago Community Trust.
31. Illinois Commission on the Future of the Public Service. (1991b). Excellence in public service: Chicago's challenge for the 90s. Chicago: Chicago Community Trust.
32. Illinois Commission on the Future of the Public Service. (1991c). Excellence in public service: Illinois’ challenge for the 90s. Chicago: Chicago Community Trust.
33. Ingraham, P. W., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (1990). The state of merit in the federal government (Occasional paper). Washington, DC: National Commission on the Public Service.
34. Johnson, R. C. (1988). Successful reform litigation: The Shakman patronage case. Chicago Kent Law Review, 64, 479-496.
35. Lynn, D. B. (2000). Personnel deregulation and the high performance workforce. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(4), 55-69.
36. Manor, R. (2000, September 3). Hazy line divides Chicago insider's public, private roles. Chicago Tribune, S4, p. 1.
37. Martin, L., & Cohen, L. (2000, February 5). Clout firm fenced out of new contracts. Chicago Tribune, S1, p. 1.
38. McKinney, D. (1999, October 4). GOP's soldiers rake in state jobs. Chicago Sun-Times, p.1.
39. National Commission on the State and Local Public Service. (1993). Hard truths/tough choices: An agenda for state and local reform. Albany, NY: The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
40. Nigro, L. G., & Kellough, J. E. (2000). Civil service reform in Georgia. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(4), 41-54.
41. O’Connor, M. (2000a, February 2). Charges reach Ryan's inner circle. Chicago Tribune, S1, p. 8.
42. O’Connor, M. (2000b, February 12). Ex-license facility supervisor is sentenced to 18 months in prison. Chicago Tribune, S1, p. 5.
43. O’Hare Truck Service, Inc. et al. v. City of Northlake et al., S. Ct., 2353 (1996).
44. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45. Pearson, R. (1991, October 27). Edgar patronage aide given new state post. Chicago Tribune, S2, p. 2.
46. Rutan et al. v. Republican Party of Illinois et al., U.S. Supreme Court Reports 111 L Ed. 2nd (1990).
47. Secter, B., & Gaines, W. (1999, July 13). Daley, Inc. Chicago Tribune, S1, p. 1.
48. Shakman et al. v. Democratic Organization of Cook County et al., 481 F. Supp. 1315, 1320-26, N.D. Ill. (1979).
49. Shakman et al. v. Democratic Organization of Cook County et al., Consent Decree with the City of Chicago No. 69 C 2145 (1983).
50. Shakman v. Democratic Party of Cook County et al., 435 F. 2d 267 (1970).
51. Spielman, F. (1998, October 23). Council grills Daley aides on allegation of patronage. Chicago Sun-Times, p.42.
52. Vickery v. Jones, 100 F. 3d. 1334 (1996).
53. Zajac, A., & Long, R. (2000a, March 3). FBI expands probe of Ryan fundraising. Chicago Tribune, S1, p. 1.
54. Zajac, A., & Long, R. (2000b, March 3). Ryan's staff felt pressure. Chicago Tribune, S1, p. 1.