Making sense of audience discourses: Towards a multidimensional model of mass media reception

European Journal of Cultural Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 233-258

  Schrøder, Kim Christian ^a  

^a ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

audience research; decoding; empirical analysis; ideology; qualitative research; reception theory; social change

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993746888     PISSN: 13675494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/136754940000300205     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barker, M. and K. Brooks (1998) ‘On Looking into Bourdieu's Black Box’, in R. Dickinson et al. (eds) Approaches to Audiences, pp. 218–232. London: Arnold.
2. Barthes, R. (1977[1964]) ‘The Rhetoric of the Image’, in Image–Music–Text. London: Fontana.
3. Brown, J.D. and L. Schulze (1990) ‘The Effects of Race, Gender, and Fandom on Audience Interpretations of Madonna's Music Videos’, Journal of Communication 40(2): 88–102.
4. Condit, C.M. (1989) ‘The Rhetorical Limits of Polysemy’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication 6(2): 103–122.
5. Corner, J. (1980) ‘Codes and Cultural Analysis’, Media, Culture & Society 2: 73–86.
6. Corner, J. and K. Richardson (1986) ‘Documentary Meanings and the Discourse of Interpretation’, in J. Corner (ed.) Documentary and the Mass Media. London: Sage.
7. Dahlgren, Peter (1998) ‘Critique: Elusive Audiences’, in R. Dickinson, R. Harindranath and O. Linné (eds) Approaches to Audiences, pp. 298–310. London: Arnold.
8. Deacon, D., N. Fenton and A. Bryman (1999) ‘From Inception to Reception: The Natural History of a News Item’, Media, Culture & Society 21(1): 5–31.
9. Drotner, K. (1996) ‘Less is More: Media Ethnography and its Limits’, in P.I. Crawford and S. Hafsteinsson (eds) The Construction of the Viewer: Media Ethnography and the Anthropology of Audiences, pp. 28–46. Højbjerg: Intervention Press.
10. Eco, U. (1979) The Role of the Reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. Fairclough, N. (1995) Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
13. Fish, S. (1980) Is there a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Fiske, J. (1987) Television Culture. London: Methuen.
15. Fiske, J. (1989) ‘Moments of Television: Neither the Text nor the Audience’, in E. Seiter et al. (eds) Remote Control. Television, Audiences and Cultural Power. London: Routledge.
16. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17. Gripsrud, J. (1995) The DYNASTY Years: Hollywood, Television and Critical Media Studies. London: Routledge.
18. Hall, S. (1973[1980]) ‘Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse’, stencilled paper no. 7, Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies 1973. Edited version published in S. Hall et al. (eds) Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson.
19. Hall, S. (1989[1994]) ‘Reflections upon the Encoding/Decoding Model: An Interview with Stuart Hall’, in J. Cruz and J. Lewis (eds) Viewing, Reading, Listening. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20. Hodge, R. and G. Kress (1988) Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Hodge, R. and D. Tripp (1986) Children and Television. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22. Höijer, B. (1998) ‘Social Psychological Perspectives in Reception Analysis’, in R. Dickonson et al. (eds) Approaches to Audiences. London: Arnold.
23. Jensen, K.B. (1990) ‘The Politics of Polysemy: Television News, Everyday Consciousness, and Political Action’, Media, Culture & Society 12(1) 74–90; revised version published as ch. 5 in Jensen, The Social Semiotics of Mass Communication. London: Sage, 1995.
24. Jensen, K.B. (1991) ‘When is Meaning? Communication Theory, Pragmatism, and Mass Media Reception’, in J. Anderson (ed.) Communication Yearbook, vol. 14, pp. 3–32. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Jensen, K.B. (1995) The Social Semiotics of Mass Communication. London: Sage.
26. Lewis, Justin (1991) The Ideological Octopus: An Exploration of Television and its Audience. London: Routledge.
27. Liebes, T. and E. Katz (1986) ‘Patterns of Involvement in Television Fiction’, European Journal of Communication 1(2):151–171.
28. Livingstone, S. (1998) ‘Audience Research at the Crossroads. The “Implied Audience” in Media and Cultural Theory’, European Journal of Cultural Studies 1(2): 193–217.
29. Ljuslinder, K. (1997) ‘Berättandets betydelse for mottagarnas tolkningsmöjligheter’ (The Significance of Narrative Structure for Audience Interpretation), paper for the XIII Nordic Conference for Mass Communication Research, Jyväskylä, Finland, August 1997.
30. Moores, S. (1993) Interpreting Audiences: The Ethnography of Media Consumption. London: Sage.
31. Morley, D. (1980), The ‘Nationwide’ Audience. London: British Film Institute.
32. Morley, D. (1992a) ‘Interpreting Television: The Nationwide Audience’, in Morley, Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
33. Morley, D. (1992b) ‘The “Nationwide” Audience: A Critical Postscript’, in Morley, Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
34. Morley, D. (1992c) Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
35. O'Donohoe, S. (1997) ‘Leaky Boundaries: Intertextuality and Young Adult Experiences of Advertising’, in M. Nava, A. Blake, I. MacRury and B. Richards (eds) Buy This Book: Studies in Advertising and Consumption. London: Routledge.
36. Parkin, F. (1971) Class Inequality and Political Order. London: Paladin.
37. Peirce, C.S. (1985) ‘Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs’, in H. Innis (ed.) Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
38. Roe, I. (1996) ‘Corporate Affiliations and Advertising: A Qualitative Study for the United Way of the Lower Mainland’, research report, School of Communication, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
39. Schrøder, K.C. (1988) ‘The Pleasure of DYNASTY’, in P. Drummond and R. Paterson (eds) Television and its Audience. London: British Film Institute.
40. Schrøder, K.C. (1989) ‘The Playful Audience: The Continuity of the Popular Cultural Tradition in America’, in M. Skovmand (ed.) Media Fictions. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
41. Schrøder, K.C. (1993) ‘Corporate Advertising from Senders to Receivers’, The Nordicom Review 1993(1). Gothenburg, Sweden.
42. Schrøder, K.C. (1994) ‘Audience Semiotics, Interpretive Communities and the Ethnographic Turn’ in Media Research’, Media, Culture and Society 16(2): 337–347.
43. Schrøder, K.C. (1997) ‘Cynicism and Ambiguity. British Corporate Responsibility Advertisements and their Readers in the 1990s’, in M. Nava, A. Blake, I. MacRury and B. Richards (eds) Buy This Book: Studies in Advertising and Consumption. London: Routledge.
44. Swales, J.M. and P.S. Rogers (1995) ‘Discourse and the Projection of Corporate Culture: The Mission Statement’, Discourse & Society 6(2): 223–242.
45. Wren-Lewis, J. (1983) ‘The Encoding/Decoding Model: Criticisms and Redevelopments for Research on Decoding’, Media, Culture & Society 5: 179–197.