Organizational Climate in Its Semiotic Aspect: A Postmodern Community College Undergoes Renewal

Community College Review

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-21

  Ayers, David F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993724980     PISSN: 00915521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009155210503300101     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ayers, D. F. (2002). Developing climates for renewal in the community college: A case study of dissipative self-organization. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 26, 165-185.
2. Baker, G. (Ed.). (1992). Cultural leadership: Inside America's community colleges. Washington, DC: Community College Press.
3. Baker, G., & Hoover, M. (1997). Personal assessment of the college environment (PACE). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, National Initiative for Leadership and Institutional Effectiveness.
4. Bergquist, W. H. (1993). The postmodern organization: Mastering the art of irreversible change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bergquist, W. H. (1998). The postmodem challenge: Changing our community colleges. In J. S. Levin (Ed.), Organizational change in the community college: A ripple or a sea change? (pp. 87-98). New Directions for Community Colleges, no, 102. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
8. Forehand, B., & Gilmer, B. (1964). Environmental variation in studies of organizational behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 361-382.
9. French, R. P., & Raven, R. (1959). The basis of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
10. Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
11. Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1999). Positive turbulence: Developing climates for creativity, innovation, and renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
13. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
14. Levin, J. S. (1998). Making sense of organizational change. In J. S. Levin (Ed.), Organizational change in the community college: A ripple or a sea change? (pp. 43-54). New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 102. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Likert, R. (1967). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Litwin, G. H., & Stringer, R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Boston: Harvard University Press.
18. Marshall, C. M., & Rossman, G. G. (1995). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Nonaka, I., & Teece, D. J. (Eds.). (2001). Managing industrial knowledge; Creation, transfer and utilization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. O'Banion, T. (1997). A learning college for the 21st century. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
21. Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1978). The case for subsystem climates in organizations. Academy of Management Review 3(1), 151-157.
22. Roueche, J. E., & Baker, G. A., III. (1987). Access and excellence: The open-door college. Washington, DC: Community College Press.
23. Stringer, R. (2002). Leadership and organizational climate. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Weatherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (2001). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.