Is Home Detention in New Zealand Disadvantaging Women and Children?

Probation Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 115-126

  King, Denise ^a   Gibbs, Anita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

electronic monitoring; family; home detention; probation sentences; women

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993723145     PISSN: 02645505     EISSN: 17413079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0264550503502003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Allen, H. (1987) Justice Unbalanced: Gender, Psychiatry and Judicial Decisions. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
2. Carlen, P. (1998) Sledgehammer: Women’s Imprisonment at the Millennium. London: Macmillan.
3. Chesney-Lind, M. (2000) ‘Women and the Criminal Justice System: Gender Matters’, in Topics in Community Corrections, Annual Issue 2000, pp. 7–10. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
4. Church, A. & Dunstan, S. (1997) Home Detention: The Evaluation of the Home Detention Pilot Programme 1995–1997. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
5. Dodgson, K. & Mortimer, E. (2000) Home Detention Curfew–The First Year of Operation. Research Findings 110. London: Home Office.
6. Dodgson, K., Goodwin, P., Howard, P., Llewellyn-Thomas, S., Mortimer, E., Russell, N. & Weiner, M. (2001) Electronic Monitoring of Released Prisoners: an Evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. Home Office Research Study 222. London: Home Office.
7. Doherty, D. (1995) ‘Impressions of the Impact of the Electronic Monitoring Program on the Family’, in K. Schulz (ed.), Electronic Monitoring and Corrections: The Policy, The Operation, The Research. Canada: Simon Fraser University.
8. Enos, R., Holman, J.E. & Caroll, M.E. (1992) Alternative Sentencing. Indiana: Wyndhamhall.
9. Gibbs, A. & King, D. (2001) The Electronic Ball and Chain? The Development, Operation and Impact of Home Detention in New Zealand. Dunedin: Community and Family Studies, University of Otago.
10. Gibbs, A. & King, D. (2002). Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring in New Zealand and its Implications, in VISTA 7 (2), Summer 2002, pp. 100–110.
11. Liverani, R.M. (1998) ‘Slow take-up for Home Detention: Magistrates cool, many lawyers unaware of the option’, in Law Society Journal, February Issue, pp. 42–48.
12. Lilly, R. & Nellis, M. (2001) ‘Home Detention Curfew and the Future of Electronic Monitoring’, in Prison Service Journal, May Issue, pp. 59–69.
13. Mortimer, E. & Mair, G. (1997) Curfew Orders with Electronic Monitoring: The First Twelve Months. Research Findings No. 51. London: Home Office.
14. Nellis, M. (2000) ‘Law and Order: The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders’, in D.P. Dolowitz (ed.) Policy Transfer and British Social Policy Learning from the USA? Philadelphia: OUP.
15. Payne, B.K. & Gainey, R.R. (1998) ‘A Qualitative Assessment of the Pains Experienced on Electronic Monitoring’, in International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 42, pp. 149–163.
16. Payne, B.K. & Gainey, R.R. (2000) ‘Electronic Monitoring: Philosophical, Systemic, and Political Issues’, in Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 31, pp. 93–111.
17. Schultz, K. (ed.) (1995) Electronic Monitoring and Corrections: The Policy, The Operation, The Research. Canada: Simon Fraser University.
18. Spier, P. (2000) Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1990–1999. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
19. Spier, P. (2001) Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1991–2000. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
20. Whitaker, M. (2000) ‘Responding to Women Offenders: Equitable Does Not Mean Identical’, in Topics in Community Corrections, Annual Issue 2000, pp. 4–6. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
21. Whitfield, D. (1997) Tackling The Tag: The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press.
22. Whitfield, D. (2001) The Magic Bracelet: Technology and Offender Supervision. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press.