Recent Trends in Sentencing and Penal Policy in New Zealand

International Criminal Justice Review

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-31

  Brown, Mark ^a   Young, Warren ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993698725     PISSN: 10575677     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105756770001000102     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology ofcriminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.
2. Bakker, L., Riley, D., & O’Malley, J. (1995).The identification of high risk offenders. Christchurch, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
3. Brown, M. (1996). Serious offending and the management of public risk in New Zealand. British Journal of Criminology, 36, 18-36.
4. Brown, M. (1998, October). Serious violence and the dilemmas of sentencing: A comparison of three incapacitation strategies. Criminal Law Review, pp. 710-722.
5. Church, A., & Dunstan, S. (1997). Home detention: The evaluation of the Home Detention Pilot Program 1995- 1997. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Justice.
6. Cohen, S. (1985).Visions of social control. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
7. Consedine, J. (1995). Restorativejustice: Healing the effects of crime. Christchurch, New Zealand: Ploughshare Publications.
8. Consedine, J., & Bowen, H. (Eds.). (1999). Restorative justice: Contemporary themes and practice. Christchurch, New Zealand: Ploughshare Publications.
9. Erez, E., Roeger, L., & Morgan, F. (1994). Victim impactstatements in South Australia: An evaluation. Adelaide, Australia: South Australian Attorney-General’s Department.
10. Galaway, B., & Spier, P. (1992). Sentencing to reparation. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
11. Garland, D. (1996). The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology, 36, 445-471.
12. Hudson, J., Morris, A., Maxwell, G., & Galaway, B. (Eds.). (1996). Family group conferences. Annandale, New South Wales, Australia: The Federation Press.
13. Hudson, S. M., Marshall, W. L., Ward, T., & Johnston, P. W. (1995). Kia Marama: A cognitive-behavioural program for incarcerated child molesters. Behavior Change, 12, 69-80.
14. Lash, B. (1996). Census ofprison inmates 1995. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Justice.
15. Lee, A., & Searle, W. (1993). Victims needs: An issuespaper. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
16. Lee, A., Searle, W., & Atkinson, K. (1993). Victims needs: The results of the survey. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
17. Leibrich, J. (1991). The probation division’s perception of its role in reducing reoffending. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
18. MRL Research Group. (1993). Public attitudes towards policing. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
19. Marshall, T., & Merry, S. (1990). Crime and accountability. London, England: HMSO.
20. Marshall, W. L. (1996). Assessment, treatment and theorising about sex offenders: Developments during the past twenty years and future directions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 162-199.
21. Marshall, W. L., & Eccles, A. (1996). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of sex offenders. In V. Van Hasselt & M. Hersen (Eds.), Sourcebook ofpsychological treatment manualsfor adult disorders (pp. 295-332). New York, NY: Plenum Publishers.
22. Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
23. Maxwell, G., & Morris, A. (1993). Family, victims and culture: Youthjustice in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Social Policy Agency and Institute of Criminology, Victoria University of Wellington.
24. Maxwell, G., Morris, A., & Anderson, T. (1999). Community panel adult pre-trial diversion: Supplementary diversion. Wellington, New Zealand: Crime Prevention Unit and Institute of Criminology.
25. McElrea, F. (1994). Restorativejustice-theNew Zealand Youth Court: A model for development in other courts. Journal of Judicial Administration, 41, 44-54.
26. McElrea, F. (Ed.). (1995). Rethinking criminaljustice. Auckland, New Zealand: Legal Research Foundation.
27. McLaren, K. (1992). Reducingreoffending: What works now. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
28. Ministry of Justice. (1995). Restorativejustice: A discussion paper. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
29. Ministry of Justice. (1997). Sentencing policy and guidance: A discussion paper. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
30. Ministry of Justice. (1998). The use of imprisonment in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
31. Morris, A., & Maxwell, G. (1993). Juvenile justice in New Zealand: A new paradigm. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 26(1),72-90.
32. New Zealand Police. (1997). National Diversion Guidelines. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Police.
33. O’Malley, P. (1992). Risk, power and crime prevention. Economy and Society, 21, 252-275.
34. O’Malley, P. (1994). Neo-liberal crime control: Political agendas and the future of crime prevention in Australia. In D. Chappell & P. Wilson (Eds.), The Australian criminal justice system, the mid 1990s (4th ed., pp. 283-298).Sydney, Australia: Butterworths.
35. O’Malley, P. (1999). Volatile and contradictory punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 3, 175-196.
36. Palmer, T. (1996). Programmatic and non-programmatic aspects of successful intervention. In A. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work (pp. 131-182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Penal Policy Review Committee. (1981). Report. Wellington, New Zealand: Government Printer.
38. Pratt, J. (1996). Governmentafity, neo-fliberalism and dangerousness: Reflections on recent trends toward the punishment ofpersistence. Unpublished manuscript, Victoria University of Wellington.
39. R. v. Dutch, 1 NZLR 304 (1981).
40. R. v. Grey, 8 CRNZ 523 (1992).
41. R. v. Moananui, NZLR 537 (1983).
42. R. v. Rose, 2 NZLR (1990).
43. Royal Commission on the Courts. (1978). Report. Wellington, New Zealand: Government Printer.
44. Simon, J. (1995). They died with theirbootson: The boot camp and the limits of modern penality. Social Justice, 22, 25-49.
45. Smith, L., & Cram, F. (1998). An evaluation of the Community Panel Diversion Pilot Programme. Wellington, New Zealand: Crime Prevention Unit.
46. Spier, P. (1995). Conviction and sentencing of offenders in New Zealand: 1985 to 1994. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
47. Spier, P. (1996). Conviction and sentencing of offenders in New Zealand: 1986 to 1995. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
48. Spier, P. (1997). Conviction and sentencing of offenders in New Zealand: 1987 to 1996. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
49. Spier, P., & Luketina, F. (1988). The impact on sentencing of the Criminal Justice Act 1985. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
50. Stewart, T. (1996). Family group conferences with young offenders in New Zealand. In J. Hudson, A. Morris, G. Maxwell, & B. Galaway (Eds.), Family group conferences (pp. 65-87). Annandale, New South Wales, Australia: The Federation Press.
51. Tonry, Michael H. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York, NY: OUP.
52. Triggs, S. (1995). Forecasting New Zealand’s prison population. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
53. Triggs, S. (1998). From crime to sentence: Trends in criminaljustice, 1986-1996. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Justice.
54. Umbreit, M. (1994). Victim meets offender: The impact of restorative justice and mediation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
55. Umbreit, M., & Coates, R. (1992). Victim offender mediation: An analysis ofprograms infour states of the US. Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Citizens Council on Crime and Justice.
56. Victim Support Annual Report. (1996). Wellington, New Zealand: National Council of Victim Support Groups.
57. Victims’ Task Force. (1993). Towards equality in criminaljustice: Report to the Minister of Justice. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
58. von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doingjustice: The choice ofpunishments. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
59. Wright, M. (1991). Justicefor victims and offenders: A restorative response to crime. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
60. Wright, M., & Galaway, B. (Eds.). (1988). Mediation and criminaljustice. London, England: Sage.
61. Yeboah, D. (1999). National evaluation report on the Habilitation Centres Pilot Programme. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Corrections, Wellington, New Zealand.
62. Young, W., & Brown, M. (1993). Cross-national comparisons of imprisonment. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 1-50). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63. Young, W., & Cameron, N. (1992). Adult pre-trial diversion in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
64. Young, W., Morris, A., Cameron, N., & Haslett, S. (1997). New Zealand National Survey of Crime Victims 1996. Wellington, New Zealand: Victimisation Survey Committee.
65. Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses: A newfocusfor criminaljustice. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press.