Fewer Paraprofessionals and More Teachers and Therapists in Educational Programs for Students with Significant Disabilities

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 250-253

  Brown, Lou ^a   Farrington, Kim ^a   Ziegler, Michele ^a   Knight, Tracy ^b   Ross, Charlotte ^c  

^a Wisconsin Department Natural Rsrc   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BENEDICTINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993698295     PISSN: 15407969     EISSN: 21692408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2511/rpsd.24.4.250     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Brost M. Johnson T. (1986). Special education does not mean special classes: Two parents' observations about Louisville, Kentucky's experiences in integrating special and regular education systems and students. Madison: Wisconsin Coalition for Advocacy.
2. Brown L. Kluth P. Suomi J. Jorgensen J. (in press). Serving formerly excluded or rejected students with disabilities in regular education classrooms in home elementary schools: Three options. In Ed. Sailor W. (Ed.), Inclusive education and school/community partnerships. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Brown L. Long E. Solner A. Udvari Davis L. VanDeventer P. Ahlgren C. Johnson F. Gruenewald L. Jorgensen J. (1987). The home school: Why students with significant disabilities must attend the schools of their brothers, sisters, friends and neighbors. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 8–13.
4. Brown L. Long E. Solner A. Udvari Schwarz P. VanDeventer P. Ahlgren C. Johnson F. Gruenewald L. Jorgensen J. (1987). Should students with severe intellectual disabilities be based in regular or in special education classrooms in home schools? Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 8–13.
5. Etscheidt S. Bartlett L. (1999). The IDEA amendements: A four-step approach for determining supplementary aids and services. Exceptional Children, 65, 163–174.
6. Freschi D. F. (1999). Guidelines for working with one-to-one aides. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(4), 42–45.
7. Giangreco M. F. Edelman S. W. Luiselli T. E. MacFarland S. Z. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7–18.
8. Kennedy F. (1942). The problem of social control of the congenital defective: Education, sterilization, euthanasia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 99, 227–233.
9. Kliewer C. Drake S. (1998). Disability, eugenics and the current ideology of segregation: A modern moral tale. Disability and Society, 13(1), 95–111.
10. Marks S. Schrader C. Levine M. (1999). Paraeducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping, hovering, or holding their own? Exceptional Children, 65, 315–328.
11. McGregor G. Vogelsberg R. T. (1998). Inclusive schooling practices: Pedagogical and research foundations: A synthesis of the literature that informs best practices about inclusive schooling. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
12. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1998). Learning disabilities: Use of paraprofessionals. Rockville, MD: Author.
13. Owen M. J. (1999, April). A “new” Dr. Death at Princeton. TASH Newsletter, 25(4), 14–18.
14. Pickett A. (1996, September). Factors that influence the performance, development and supervision of paraeducators in inclusive classrooms. TASH Newsletter, 22(9), 7–8.
15. Salisbury C. Chambers A. (1994). Instructional costs of inclusive schooling. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 215–222.
16. Sobsey D. (1999, April). Canada's Latimer case: Implications for equal justice. TASH Newsletter, 25(4), 30–33.
17. Strully J. Strully C. (1985). Friendship and our children. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 224–227.