Incorporating Individual Differences Into the Science of Learning: Commentary on Sternberg et al. (2008)

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 507-508

  Mayer, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993683871     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00093.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Carroll J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Cronbach L.J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychology,12,671–684.
3. Cronbach L.J. Snow R.E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Wiley.
4. Kalyuga S. (2005). The individual differences principle in multimedia learning. In Ed. Mayer R.E. (Ed.),The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 325–338). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Massa L.J. Mayer R.E. (2006). Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style? Learning and Individual Differences,16,321–336.
6. Mayer R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Sternberg R.J. Grigorenko E. Zhang L. (2008). Styles of learning and thinking matter in instruction and assessment. Perspectives on Psychological Science,3,486–506.
8. Sternberg R.J. Zhang L. (Eds.). (2001). Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.