A Perspective on International Business Scholarship: Is It Regional or Global?

Multinational Business Review

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 73-88

  Perez Batres, Luis A ^a   Pisani, Michael J ^b   Doh, Jonathan P ^b  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship; Globalization; International business literature; International business research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993102463     PISSN: 1525383X     EISSN: 20541686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/1525383X201000004     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Adler, N.J., and A.H. Harzing. 2009. When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning and Education 8(1): 72-95.
2. Aggarwal, R., J.K. Ryans, V. Petrovic, and S. Zong. 2008. Outstanding international business research: Nature of the best international business dissertations. Multinational Business Review 16(1): 1-19.
3. Ashkanasy, N.M., E. Trevor-Roberts, and L. Earnshaw. 2002. The Anglo cluster: Legacy of the British Empire. Journal of World Business 37, 28-39.
4. Chan, K.C., H.G. Fung, and P. Lai. 2005. Membership on editorial boards and rankings of schools with international business orientation. Journal of International Business Studies 36: 452-469.
5. Chan, K.C., H. Fung, and W.K. Leung. 2006. International business research: Trends and school rankings. International Business Review 15: 317-338.
6. DuBois, F.L., and D. Reeb. 2000. Ranking the international business journals. Journal of International Business Studies 31(4): 689-704.
7. Eden, L., and S.R. Miller. 2004. Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. In Advances in International Management, Theories of Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, Complexity and Relevance, eds. M.A. Hitt and J.L.C. Cheng, 182-222. Boston: Elsevier.
8. Friedman, T.L. 2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
9. Griffith, D.A., T.A. Cavusgil, and S. Xu. 2008. Emerging themes in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies 36(7): 1220-1235.
10. Gupta, V., P.J. Hanges, and P. Dorfman. 2002. Cultural clusters: Methodology and findings. Journal of World Business 37: 11-15.
11. Hennig-Thurau, T., G. Walsh, and U. Schrader. 2004. VHB-Jourqual: Ein Ranking von betriebswirtschaftlich-relevanten Zeitschriften auf der Grundlage von Expertenurteilen. In: zfbf, 56(9): 520-545.
12. Hymer, S.H. 1960/1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1960).
13. House, R., M. Javidan, P. Hanges, and P. Dorfman. 2002. Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business 37(1): 3-10.
14. Inkpen, A.C. 2001. A note on ranking the international business journals. Journal of International Business Studies 32(1): 193-196.
15. Inkpen, A.C., and P.W. Beamish. 1994. An analysis of twenty-five years of research in the journal of international business studies. Journal of International Business Studies 25(4): 703-713.
16. Kumar, V., and S.K. Kundu. 2004. Ranking the International Business Schools: Faculty Publications as the Measure. Management International Review 44(2): 213-228.
17. Luo, Y., O. Shenkar, and M. Nyaw. 2002. Mitigating liabilities of foreignness: Defensive versus offensive approaches. Journal of International Management 8(3): 283-300.
18. Morrison, A., and A. Inkpen. 1991. An analysis of significant contributions to the international business literature. Journal of International Business Studies 22: 143-154.
19. Perez-Batres, L.A., and L. Eden. 2008. Is there a liability of localness? How emerging market firms respond to regulatory punctuations. Journal of International Management 14: 232-251.
20. Pisani, N. 2009. International management research: Investigating its recent diffusion in top management journals. Journal of Management 35:199-218.
21. Podsakoff, P.M., S.B. MacKenzie, N.P. Podsakoff, and D.G. Bachrach. 2008. Scholarly influence in the field of management: a bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management 34: 641-720.
22. Rugman, A.M., and C. Brain. 2004. Regional strategies of multinational pharmaceutical firms. Management International Review 44(SI3): 7-25.
23. Rugman, A.M., and J.P. Doh. 2008. Multinationals & Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24. Rugman, A. M., and A. Verbeke. 2005. Towards a theory of regional multinationals: A transaction costs economics approach. Management International Review SI (1): 5-17.
25. Rugman, A.M., and A. Verbeke. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies 35(1): 3-18.
26. Seggie, S.H., and D.A. Griffith. 2009. What does it take to get promoted in marketing academia? Understanding exceptional publication productivity in the leading marketing journals. Journal of Marketing 73(1): 122-132.
27. Sethi, D., and W. Judge. 2009. Reappraising liabilities of foreignness within an integrated perspective of the costs and benefits of doing business abroad. International Business Review 18(4): 404-416.
28. Werner, S., and L.E. Brouthers. 2002. How international is management? Journal of International Business Studies 33(3): 583-591.
29. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal 38: 341-363.
30. Zaheer, S. 2002. The liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary. Journal of International Management 8: 351-358.
31. Zaheer, S., and E. Mosakowski. 1997. The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal 18: 439-464.