The European public relations body of knowledge

Journal of Communication Management

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 341-351

  Vercic D ^a  

^a Pristop Communications   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Communication management; Corporate communication; Delphi study; Europe; Organisational communication; Public relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993017415     PISSN: 1363254X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb023531     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Verčič, D., White, J. and Moss, D. (eds) ‘Is there anything original in European public relations’, Pristop Communications, Ljubljana, pp. 133–143.
2. Sriramesh, K. and White, J. (1992) ‘Societal culture and public relations’, in Grunig, J. E. (ed.) ‘Excellence in public relations and communication management’, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 597– 614.
3. Verčič, D. and Grunig, J. E. (2000) ‘The origins of public relations theory in economics and strategic management’, in Moss, D., Verčič, D. and Warnaby, G. (eds) ‘Perspectives on public relations research’, Routledge, London, pp. 9–58.
4. Nesmann, K. (2000) ‘The origins and development of public relations in Germany and Austria’, in Moss, D., Verčič, D. and Warnaby, D. (eds) ‘Perspectives on public relations research’, Routledge, London, pp. 211–225.
5. Coombs, W. T., Holladay, S., Hasenauer, G. and Signitzer, B. (1994) ‘A comparative analysis of international pubic relations: Identification and interpretation of similarities and differences between professionalization in Austria, Norway, and the United States’, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 23–39.
6. Grunig, L. A., Grunig, G. E. and Verčič, D. (1998) ‘Are the IABC's excellence principles generic? Comparing Slovenia and the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada’, Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 335–356.
7. MacManus, T. (1997) ‘A comparative analysis of public relations in Austria and the United Kingdom’, in Moss, D., MacManus, T. and Verčič, D. (eds) ‘Public relations research: An international perspective’, Thomson Business Press, London, pp. 170–196.
8. Nessmann, K. (1995) ‘Public relations in Europe: A comparison with the United States’, Public Relations Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 151–160.
9. Verčič, D., Grunig, L. A. and Grunig, J. E. (1996) ‘Global and specific principles of public relations: Evidence from Slovenia’, in Culbertson, H. M. and Chen, N. (eds) ‘International public relations: A comparative analysis’, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 31–65.
10. Willems, J. (1991) ‘Public relations education in Europe: Survey of fulltime study programmes’, s.l., CERP Education.
11. Moss, D., MacManus, T. and Verčič, D. (eds) (1997) ‘Public relations research: An international perspective’, International Thomson Business Press, London.
12. Verčič, D., White, J. and Moss, D. (eds) (1998) ‘Proceedings of the fifth International Public Relations Research Symposium, Lake Bled, Slovenia, 10th–12th, July 1998’, Pristop Communications, Ljubljana.
13. Harris, P., Moss, D., Verčič, D., and White, J. (1995) Journal of Communication Management, special issue on government relations and public affairs, Vol. 3, No. 3.
14. Verčič, D., White, J. and Moss, D. (1999) ‘Proceedings of the 6th International Public Relations Research Symposium, Lake Bled, Slovenia, 2nd–3rd July 1999’, Pristop Communications, Ljubljana.
15. Moss, D., Verčič, D. and Warnaby, G. (2000) ‘Perspectives on public relations research’, Routledge, London.
16. Public Relations Body of Knowledge Task Force (1988) ‘Special issue on the body of knowledge’, Public Relations Review, Vol. 14, No. 1.
17. PRSA (1993) ‘The public relations body of knowledge: Updated’, Public Relations Society of America, New York.
18. Verčič, D. (1994) ‘Public relations — Research perspectives’, International Public Relations Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 9-11, cit. p. 9.
19. Newsom, D., Turk, J. V. and Kruckeberg, D. (1996) ‘This is PR: The realities of public relations’, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, cit. p. 13.
20. Delbecq, A. L., Van der Ven, A. H. and Gustafson, D. H. (1975) ‘Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes’, Scot, Foresman, Glenview, IL.
21. Linstone, H. A. and Turoff, M. (eds) (1975) ‘The Delphi method: Techniques and applications’, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
22. Wakefield, R. I. (2000) ‘Preliminary Delphi research on international public relations programming’, in Moss, D., Verčič, D. and Warnaby, G. (eds) ‘Perspectives on public relations research’, Routledge, London, pp. 179–208.
23. White, J. and Blamphin, J. (1994) ‘Priorities for research into public relations practice in the United Kingdom: A report from a Delphi study carried out among UK practitioners and public relations academics in May, June and July 1994’, unpublished paper, City University, London.
24. Wakefield, R. I. (1997) ‘International public relations: A theoretical approach to excellence based on a worldwide Delphi study’, PhD dissertation, College Park, MD.
25. White, J. and Blamphin, J. (1994) International Public Relations Review
26. White, J. (2000) ‘Psychology and public relations’, in Moss, D., Verčič, D. and Warnaby, G. (eds) ‘Perspectives on public relations research’, Routledge, London, pp. 145–155.
27. Drucker, P. F. (1993) ‘Post-capitalist society’, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, p. 5.
28. Thurley, K. and Wirdenius, H. (1989) ‘Towards European management’, Pitman, London, p. 25.
29. Grunig, J. E. and Hunt, T. (1984) ‘Managing public relations’, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Orlando, FL, p. 14.
30. Kneale, W. and Kneale, M. (1986) ‘The development of logic’, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 318.
31. Hazleton, V. and Cutbirth, C. (1993) ‘Public relations in Europe: An alternative educational paradigm’, Public Relations Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 187–196.
32. Parsons, T. (1978) ‘Action theory and the human condition’, Free Press, New York.