The individualized service plan as a clinical integration tool: Qualitative analysis in the quebec PRISMA experiment

International Journal of Integrated Care

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Somme, Dominique ^a   Hébert, Réjean ^b   Bravo, Gina ^c   Blanchard, François ^d   Saint Jean, Olivier ^a  

^a HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GERIATRICS OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^d Hopital Sebastopol   (France)

Author keywords

Case management tool; Clinical integration; Gerontology; Individualized service plan; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992999945     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15684156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/ijic.215     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kodner DL. The quest for integrated systems of care for frail older persons. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2002 Aug;14(4):307–13.
2. Kodner DL, Kyriacou CK. Fully integrated care for frail elderly: two American models. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online] 2000 Nov 1;1. Available from: http://www.ijic.org/.
3. Johri M, Beland F, Bergman H. International experiments in integrated care for the elderly: a synthesis of the evidence. International Journal of Geriatrics and Psychiatry 2003 Mar;18(3):222–35.
4. Hébert R, Durand PJ, Dubuc N, Tourigny A. PRISMA: a new model of integrated service delivery for frail older people in Canada. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online] 2003 Mar 18;3. Available from: http://www.ijic.org/.
5. Applebaum RA, Wilson NL. Training needs for providing case management for the long-term care client: lessons from the national channeling demonstration. The Gerontologist 1988 Apr;28(2):172–6.
6. Bernabei R, Landi F, Gambassi G, Sgadari A, Zuccala G, Mor V, et al. Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community. British Medical Journal 1998 May 2;316(7141):1348– 51.
7. Newcomer R, Harrington C, Kane R. Challenges and accomplishments of the second-generation social health maintenance organization. The Gerontologist 2002 Dec;42(6):843–52.
8. Tourigny A, Durand PJ, Bonin L, Hébert R, Rochette L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of an integrated service delivery (ISD) network for frail elderly. In: Hébert R, Tourigny A, Gagnon M, editors. Integrated service delivery to ensure persons’ functional autonomy. Québec: EDISEM; 2004. p 51–71.
9. Somme D, Hébert R, Bravo G, Blanchard F. Individualized service plan (ISP) concept and utilization: a review of experiments on integrated services for the elderly in Québec and elsewhere. In: Hébert R, Tourigny A, Gagnon M, editors. Integrated service delivery to ensure persons’ functional autonomy. Québec: EDISEM; 2004. p 271–89.
10. Challis D, Darton R, Johnson L, Stone M, Traske K. An evaluation of an alternative to long-stay hospital care for frail elderly patients: I. The model of care. Age and Ageing 1991 Jul;20(4):236–44.
11. Pacala JT, Boult C, Hepburn KW, Kane RA, Kane RL, Malone JK, et al. Case management of older adults in health maintenance organizations. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1995 May;43(5):538–42.
12. Riley PA, Fortinsky RH, Coburn AF. Developing consumer-centered quality assurance strategies for home care. A case management model. Journal of Case Management 1992 Summer;1(2):39–48.
13. Capitman J, Sciegaj M. A contextual approach for understanding individual autonomy in managed community long-term care. The Gerontologist 1995 Aug;35(4):533–40.
14. Moxley DP. The practice of case-management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 1989. (Sage Human Services Guide: 58).
15. Genrich SJ, Neatherlin JS. Case manager role. A content analysis of published literature. Care Management Journals 2001 Fall;3(1):14–9.
16. Landi F, Tua E, Onder G, Carrara B, Sgadari A, Rinaldi C, et al. Minimum data set for home care: a valid instrument to assess frail older people living in the community. Medical Care 2000 Dec;38(12):1184–90.
17. Hébert R, Guilbeault J, Desrosiers J, Dubuc N. The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): A clinical-based instrument for measuring disabilities and handicaps in older people. Geriatrics today: Journal of the Canadian Geriatrics Society 2001;4(9):141–7.
18. Geron SM, Chassler D. Advancing the state of the art: establishing guidelines for long-term care case management. Journal of Case Management 1995 Spring;4(1):9–14.
19. Hébert R, Veil A. Monitoring the degree of implementation of an integrated delivery system. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online] 2004 Sep 20;4. Available from: http://www.ijic.org.
20. Leutz WN. Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. Milbank Quarterly 1999;77(1):77–110, iv–v.
21. Montmollin M. de. L’ergonomie [Ergonomics]. 3rd ed. Paris: La Découverte; 1996. (Reperes 43). [in French].
22. Hébert R, Carrier R, Bilodeau A. The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age and Ageing 1988 Sep;17(5):293–302.
23. Boisvert D. Le plan de services individualisé: participation et animation [The individualized services plan: participation and animation]. rev. ed. Cap-Rouge, QC: Presses Inter Universitaires; 1995. [in French].
24. Kodner DL. Whole-system approaches to health and social care partnerships for the frail elderly: an exploration of North American models and lessons. Health & Social Care in the Community 2006 Sep;14(5):384–90.
25. Dubuc N, Hébert R, Desrosiers J, Buteau M, Trottier L. Disability-based classification system for older people in integrated long-term care services: the Iso-SMAF profiles. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2006 Mar–Apr;42(2):191–206.
26. Comité aviseur sur l’adoption d’un outil d’évaluation intégré des besoins des personnes en perte d’autonomie et de détermination des services requis, notamment en institution ou à domicile [Advisory Committee on the adoption of a tool for integrated assessment of the needs of people in loss of autonomy and determination of required services, in the institution or in community]. Québec: Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux; 2000. [in French]. Available from: http://www.msss.gouv.qc.ca/documentation/index.php.
27. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):50–2.
28. Notice d’information sur l’allocation personnalisée pour l’autonomie. [Information notice on the personalized allowance for autonomy]. Paris, France: Ministère des affaires sociales, du travail et des solidarités, Ministère de la santé de la famille et des personnes handicapées; 2001. [in French].
29. Groupe de travail sur la planification des services [Working group on the planning of the services]. Québec: Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux; 2006. [in French].