A Passion for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Research

Complementary Health Practice Review

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 198-200

  Ernst, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

balance; complementary medicine; Feldenkrais; stroke

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992905037     PISSN: 15332101     EISSN: 15523845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1076167503253853     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Eisenberg, D., David, R. B., Ettner, S. L., Appel, S., Wilkey, S., Van Rompey, M., et al. (1998). Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States; 1990-1997. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1569-1575.
2. Ernst, E. (1999). Funding research into complementary medicine: The situation in Britain. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 7, 250-253.
3. Ernst, E., Resch, K. L., & Uher, E. M. (1992). Reviewer bias. Annals of Internal Medicine, 116, 958.
4. Hrobjartsson, A., & Brorson, S. (2002). Interpreting results from randomized clinical trials of complementary/alternative interventions: The role of trial quality and pre-trial beliefs. In D. Callahan (Ed.), The role of complementary and alternative medicine (pp. 107-121). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
5. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2001). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals.
6. Nicolai, G., Friede, P., Werner, M., & Zanker, K. S. (1997). Donor-dependent and dose-dependent variation in the induction of T-lymphocyte locomotion in a three-dimensional collagen matrix system by a mistletoe preparation (Iscador). Anticancer Drugs, 8(suppl. 1), S61-S64.
7. The science of alternative medicine [issue]. (2002, December 2). Newsweek.
8. Vickers, A., Goyal, N., Harland, R., & Rees, R. (1998). Do certain countries produce only positive results—A systematic review of controlled trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 19, 159-166.