Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and Enablers

Advances in Developing Human Resources

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 541-554

  Ardichvili, Alexandre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

knowledge sharing; online learning; virtual communities of practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992897701     PISSN: 15234223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1523422308319536     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ardichvili, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., & Stuedemann, R. (2006). Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 94–107.
2. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge sharing teams. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.
3. Bansler, J.P., & Havn, E. (2003). Building community knowledge systems: An empirical study of IT-support for sharing best practices among managers. Knowledge and Process Management, 10(3), 156–163.
4. Barab, S., Schatz, S., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Using activity theory to conceptualize online community and using online community to conceptualize activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 25–47.
5. Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.
6. Chiu, C., Hsu, M., & Wang, E. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.
7. Ciborra, C.U., & Patriota, G. (1998). Groupware and teamwork in R&D: Limits to learning and innovation. R&D Management, 28(1), 1–10.
8. Cross, R., Bogatti, P., & Parker, A. (2001). Beyond answers: Dimensions of the advice network. Social Networks, 23(3), 215–235.
9. DeLong, D., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 113–27.
10. Dixon, N. (2000). Common knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Ellis, K. (2001). Sharing the best practices globally. Training, 38(7), 32–38.
12. Engstrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engstrom, R. Miettinen, & R- L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Garfield, S. (2006). Ten reasons why people don't share their knowledge. KM Review, 9(2), 10–11.
14. Gourlay, S. (2001). Knowledge management and HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4(1), 27–46.
15. Hackett, B. (2000). Beyond knowledge management: New ways to work and learn. New York: Conference Board.
16. Haimila, S. (2001). Shell creates communities of practice. KM World, 19, 1–2.
17. Hayes, N., & Walsham, G. (2000). Competing interpretations of computer supported cooperative work. Organization, 7(1), 49–67.
18. Hofstede, G.H. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Hung, D., & Chen, D. (2001). Situated cognition, Vygotskian thought and learning from the communities of practice perspective: Implications for the design of Web-based e-learning. Educational Media International, 38(1), 3–12.
20. Hutchings, K., & Michailova, S. (2004). Facilitating knowledge sharing in Russian and Chinese subsidiaries: The role of personal networks and group membership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 84–94.
21. Hwang, A., Francesco, A.M., & Kessler, E. (2003). The relationship between individualism-collectivism, face, and feedback and learning processes in Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 34(1), 72–91.
22. Kurman, J. (2003). Why is self-enhancement low in certain collectivist cultures? An investigation of two competing explanations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 496–510.
23. Janz, D., & Prasarnphanich, P. (2003). Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management: the importance of knowledge-centered culture. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 351–384.
24. Jian, G., & Jeffres, L.W. (2006). Understanding employees' willingness to contribute to shared electronic databases: A three-dimensional framework. Communication Research, 33(4), 242–261.
25. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., & Chervany, N. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–90.
27. McLure, M., & Faraj, S. (2000). It is what one does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2–3), 55–173.
28. McLure-Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.
29. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14–37.
30. Osterloh, M., & Frey, B.S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538–550.
31. Polanyi, M. (1957). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
32. Powers, V. (2004). Virtual communities at Caterpillar foster knowledge sharing. Training and Development, 58(6), 40–45.
33. Ridings, C., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3–4), 271–295.
34. Rosenberg, M. (2005). Beyond e-learning: Approaches and technologies to enhance organizational knowledge, learning, and performance. New York: Pfeiffer.
35. Rucker, R. (1999). Maintaining market leadership through learning: How Motorola uses technology to provide the right knowledge at the right time to its globally dispersed personnel. Supervision, 60(9), 3–6.
36. Scarbrough, H. (2003). Why your employees don't share what they know. KM Review, 6(2), 16–20.
37. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 27–44.
38. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W.K. (2001). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.
39. Vaast, E. (2004). O brother, where are thou? From communities to networks of practice through intranet use. Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 5–44.
40. Van Winkelen, C., & Ramsell, P. (2003). Why aligning value is key to designing communities. KM Review, 5(6), 12–18.
41. Vestal, W. (2006). CoPs in progress: AQPC and Texas Medical Association. KM Review, 9(1), 8–9.
42. Virtual teams. (n.d.). The free management library. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from http://www.managementhelp.org/grp_skll/virtual/defntion.pdf
43. Von Wartburg, I., Rost, K., & Teichert, T. (2006). The creation of social and intellectual capital in virtual communities of practice: shaping social structure in virtual communities of practice. International Journal of Learning and Change, 1(3), 299–316.
44. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.