Curriculum-Based Dynamic Assessment for New- or Second-Language Learners with Learning Disabilities in Secondary Education Settings

Assessment for Effective Intervention

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 69-84

  Barrera, Manuel ^a  

^a METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992885746     PISSN: 15345084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073724770302900107     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson, T.H., & Armbruster, B.B. (1986). The value of taking notes (Reading Education Report No. 374). Champaign: University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana, Center for the Study of Reading.
2. Artiles, A.J., & Trent, S.C. (1994). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. Journal of Special Education, 27, 410–437.
3. Baca, L., & de Valenzuela, J.S. (1994). Reconstructing the bilingual special education interface (National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education Program Information Guide Series No. 20). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
4. Barrera, M.T. (1997). Effects of the pause procedure on the lecture notes and retention of secondary students with limited English proficiency and learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Pennsylvania State University.
5. Barrera, M.T. (2000). Evaluation of individualized education plans for a Minnesota school district. Unpublished manuscript.
6. Cummins, J. (1989). A theoretical framework for bilingual special education. Exceptional Children, 56(2), 111–119.
7. Deshler, D., & Schumaker, J. (1993). Strategy mastery by at-risk students: Not a simple matter. Elementary School Journal, 94(2), 153–167.
8. Dew, N. (1984). The exceptional child: Demography. In P. C. Chinn (Ed.), Education of culturally and linguistically different exceptional children (pp. 1–41). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
9. Duncan, S.E., & DeAvila, E.A. (1990). Language Assessment Scales-Oral. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw Hill.
10. Einstein, G.O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Notetaking, individual differences and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5) 522–532.
11. Espin, C.A., & Deno, S.L. (1995). Curriculum-based measures for secondary students: Utility and task specificity of text-based reading and vocabulary measures for predicting performance on content-area tasks. Diagnostique, 20(1–4), 102–121.
12. Espin, C.A., & Tindal, G. (1998). Curriculum-based measurement for secondary students. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 214–253). New York: The Guilford Press.
13. Feuerstein, R. (1986). Learning potential assessment. Special Services in the Schools, 2(2–3), 85–106.
14. Fuchs, L.S., & Deno, S.L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57(6), 488–499.
15. Garcia, S.B., & Ortiz A.A. (1988). Preventing inappropriate referrals of language minority students to special education. New Focus: Occasional Papers in Bilingual Education, 5, Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
16. García, S.B., & Malkin, D.H. (1993). Toward defining programs and services for culturally and linguistically diverse learners in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 26(1), 52–58.
17. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English-language learners. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 454–470.
18. Gersten, R., & Woodward, J. (1994). The language minority student in special education: Issues, trends, and paradoxes. Exceptional Children, 60(4), 310–322.
19. Hallahan, D.P., & Kaufman, J.M. (1998). Introduction to special education (7th Edition). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Harry, B. (1994). The disproportionate representation of minority students in special education: Theories and recommendations. Project FORUM Final Report. (ERIC Document Resource Reproduction Service No. 374637)
21. Hughes, C.A., & Suritsky, S.K. (1993). Notetaking skills and strategies for students with learning disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 38(1), 7–11.
22. Idol, L., Nevin, A., & Paolucci-Whitcomb, P. (1999). Models of curriculum-based assessment (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
23. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (1997). 20 U. S. Code SS 1400 et seq.
24. Jitendra, A.K., & Kameenui, E. (1993). Dynamic assessment as a compensatory assessment procedure: A description and critical analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 14(5), 6–18.
25. Jitendra, A.K., & Rohena-Diaz, E. (1996) Language assessment of students who are linguistically diverse: Why a discrete approach is not the answer. The School Psychology Review, 25(1) 40–56.
26. Jitendra, A.K., Rohena-Diaz, E., & Nolet, V. (1998). A dynamic curriculum-based language assessment: Planning instruction for special needs students who are linguistically diverse. Preventing School Failure, 42(4), 182–185.
27. Kiewra, K.A. (1984). Acquiring effective notetaking skills: An alternative to professional notetaking. Journal of Reading, 27(4), 299–302.
28. Kiewra, K.A., Benton S.L., Kim S., Risch N., & Christensen, M. (1995). Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(2), 172–187
29. Lidz, C., & Peña, E. (1996). Dynamic assessment: The model, its relevance as a nonbiased approach, and its application to Latino American preschool children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27(4), 367–372.
30. MacMillan, D.L., Gresham, F.M., & Bocian, K.M. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 314–326.
31. Minnesota Department of Children, Families, and Learning. (1998). Reducing bias in special education assessment for American Indian and African-American students. Little Canada, MN: Minnesota Educational Services.
32. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1989, September 18). Letter from NJCLD to member organizations. Topic: Modifications to the NJCLD definition of learning disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
33. Obiakor, E.E., & Utley, C. (1996). Rethinking preservice and inservice training programs for teachers in the learning disabilities field: Workable multicultural models. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED397594)
34. Obiakor, F.E., & Utley, C. (1998). What do reform and restructuring mean for culturally diverse exceptional learners? In B. A. Ford, (Ed.), Compendium: Writing on effective practices for culturally and linguistically exceptional learners (pp. 88–98). Reston, Va: The Council for Exceptional Children.
35. Office of Special Education Programs. (1993). Implementing the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: 12th annual report to congress. Washington, DC: USDOE.
36. Office of Special Education Programs. (1996). Implementing the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: 18th annual report to congress. Washington, DC: USDOE.
37. Ortiz, A.A. (1997). Learning disabilities occurring concomitantly with linguistic differences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(3), 321–332.
38. Ortiz, A.A., & Wilkinson, C.Y. (1989). Adapting IEPs for limited English proficient students. Academic Therapy, 24(5), 555–568.
39. Ortiz, A.A., & Wilkinson, C.Y. (1991). Assessment and intervention model for the bilingual exceptional student (AIM for the BESt). Teacher Education and Special Education, 14(1), 35–42.
40. Rowe, M.B. (1983). Getting chemistry of the killer course list. Journal of Chemical Education, 60, 954–956.
41. Salvia, J., & Hughes, C.A. (1990). Curriculum-based assessment: Testing what is taught. New York: MacMillan.
42. Schumaker, J., & Deshler, D. (1984). Setting demand variables: A major factor in program planning for the LD adolescent. Topics in Language Disorders, 4(2), 22–40.
43. Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (1995). Assessment of students with learning disabilities: Current issues and future directions. Diagnostique, 20(1–4), 17–31.
44. Shinn, M. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
45. Suritsky, S. (1992). Note taking difficulties and approaches reported by university students with learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 10(1), 3–10.
46. Suritsky, S., & Hughes, C.A. (1991). Benefits of note taking: Implications for secondary and postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(1), 7–18.
47. Thomas, W.P., & Collier, V. (1997). School effectiveness for language minority students. National Clearinghouse on Bilingual Education Resource Collection Series, No. 9. (ERIC Document Resource Reproduction Service No. 436087)
48. Warner, M.M., Alley, G., Deshler, D., & Schumaker, J. (1980). Learning disabled adolescents in the public schools: Are they different from other low achievers? Exceptional Education Quarterly: Special Issue on Special Education for Adolescents and Young Adults, 1(2), 27–36.
49. Ysseldyke, J. (2001). Reflections on a research career: Generalizations from 25 years of research on assessment and instructional decision making. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 295–309.