A messy business: Qualitative research and ethical review

Clinical Ethics

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 114-116

  Dawson, Angus J ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992882834     PISSN: 14777509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/147775006777254551     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K. Empirical research in bioethical journals: a quantitative analysis. J Med Ethics 2006; 32: 240-5
2. Dawson A. What should we do about it? Implications of the empirical evidence in relation to comprehension and acceptability of randomisation. In: Holm S, Jonas M (eds.) Engaging the World: The Use of Empirical Research in Bioethics and the Regulation of Biotechnology. Netherlands: IOS Press, 2004
3. Dawson A. Informed Consent: Bioethical Ideal and Empirical Reality. In: Häyry M, Takala T, Herissone-Kelly P (eds.) Bioethics and Social Reality. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, 2005
4. Snowdon C, Garcia J, Elbourne D. Making sense of randomisation; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1337-55
5. Featherstone K, Donovan JL. ‘Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?’ The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Soc Sci Med 2002; 55: 709-19
6. Robinson E, Kerr C, Stevens A, Lilford R, Braunholtz D, Edwards S. Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 811-24
7. Hallowell N, Lawton J. Seeking ethical approval: opening up the lines of communication. Clin Ethics 2006; 1: 109-13
8. Dawson A, Yentis S. Contesting the science/ethics distinction in the review of clinical research. J Med Ethics 2006 (In Press)
9. Garrard E, Dawson A. What is the role of the REC? Paternalism, inducements and harm in research ethics. J Med Ethics 2005; 31: 419-23
10. Hallowell N, Foster C, Eeles R, Ardern-Jones A, Watson M. Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59: 553-65
11. Lawton J, Peel E, Parry O, Araoz G, Douglas M. Lay perceptions of type 2 diabetes in Scotland: bringing health services back in. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 1423-35
12. Levitt M, Häyry M. Overcritical? Overfriendly? A dialogue between a sociologist and a philosopher on genetic technology and its applications. Medicine, Health Care & Philosophy 2005; 8: 377-83
13. Dawson A. The Ad Hoc Advisory Group's proposals for research ethics committees: a mixture of the timid, the revolutionary and the bizarre. J Med Ethics. 2005; 31: 435-6
14. National Patient Safety Agency. Implementing the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group: Consultation. London: COREC, 2005