Empowerment Evaluation: A Response to Patton and Scriven

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 253-266

  Fetterman, David ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992882445     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821409701800308     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Campbell D. T. (1971). Methods for the experimenting society. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
2. Chelimsky E. (1997). The coming transformations in evaluation. In Chelimsky E., Shadish W.,(Eds. ), Evaluation for the 21st Century: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3. Chelimsky E., Shadish W., (Eds. ), (1997) Evaluation for the 21st Century: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4. Cousins J. B. Donohue J. J. Bloom G.A. (1996). Collaborative evaluation in North America: Evaluators’ self-reported opinions, practices and consequences. Evaluation Practice, 17(3), 207-226.
5. Cousins J. B. Earl L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 397-418.
6. Cousins J. B., Earl L. M., (Eds. ), (1995). Participatory evaluation in education: Studies of evaluation use and organizational learning. London: Falmer.
7. Fetterman D. M. (1994a). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1-15.
8. Fetterman D. M. (1994b). In response to Dr. Daniel Stufflebeam. Evaluation Practice, 16(2), 177-197.
9. Fetterman D. M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice. In Fetterman D. M., Kaftarian S., Wandersman A.,(Eds. ), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10. Fetterman D. M. (1997). Empowerment evaluation and accreditation in higher education. In Chelimsky E., Shadish W.,(Eds. ), Evaluation for the 21st Century: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 381-395.
11. Fetterman D. M., Kaftarian S., Wandersman A., (Eds. ) (1996) Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12. Greene J. C. (1997). Evaluation as advocacy. Evaluation Practice, 18(1), 25-35.
13. Guiding Principles for Evaluators (American Evaluation Association). In Shadish W. R., Newman D. L., Scheirer M. A., Wye C.,(Eds. ), New directions for program evaluation, No. 66. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 19-26.
14. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994). The program evaluation standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15. Mills C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Patton M. Q. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 311-320.
17. Patton M. Q. (1997a). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context. Evaluation Practice, 18(2), 147-163.
18. Patton M. Q. (1997b). Utilization-focused evaluation, new century edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19. Scriven M. (1997a). Empowerment evaluation examined. Evaluation Practice, 18(2), 165-175.
20. Scriven M. (1997b). Truth and objectivity in evaluation. In Chelimsky E., Shadish W.,(Eds. ), Evaluation for the 21st Century: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 477-500.
21. Sechrest L. (1997). Review of empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Environment and Behavior, 29, 422-426.
22. Stake R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23. Tax S. (1958). The fox project. Human Organization, 17, 17-19.
24. Vanderplatt M. (1995). Beyond technique: Issues in evaluating for empowerment. Evaluation, 1(1), 81-96.