Empowerment evaluation examined

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 165-175

  Scriven, Michael ^a  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957988914     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821409701800115     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Fetterman, D. (1994). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15, 1-15.
2. Fetterman, D. (1996a). Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Fetterman, D. (1996b). Conclusion: References on emergent themes and next steps. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S. J., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Levin, H.M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation and accelerated schools. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Parlett, M. & Hamilton, D. (1977). Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovatory programmes. In D. Hamilton, B. MacDonald, C. King, D. Jenkins, & M. Parlett (Eds.), Beyond the numbers game: A reader in educational evaluation. London, MacMillan.
7. Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social polity of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1-25.
8. Rippey, R.M. (1973). Studies in transactional evaluation. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
9. Stake, R.E. (1980). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. In W. B. Dockrell & D. Hamilton (Eds.), Rethinking educational research. London: Hodeder & Stoughton.