On Dialectic and International Relations: A Reply to Our Critics

Millennium - Journal of International Studies

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 455-470

  Heine, Christian ^a   Teschke, Benno ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992838774     PISSN: 03058298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/03058298970260020501     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Christian Heine and Benno Teschke, ‘Sleeping Beauty and the Dialectical Awakening: On the Potential of Dialectic for International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies (Vol. 25, No. 2, 1996), pp. 399-423.
2. Mathias Albert and Yosef Lapid, ‘On Dialectics and IR Theory: Hazards of a Proposed Marriage’, Millennium (Vol. 26, No. 2, 1997), pp. 403-415.
3. Friedrich Kratochwil, ‘Awakening or Somnambulation?’, Millennium (Vol. 26, No. 2, 1997), pp. 437-442.
4. Ekkehart Krippendorff, ‘Be Your Own Prince’, Millennium (Vol. 26, No. 2, 1997), pp. 443-447.
5. Hayo Krombach, ‘Dialectic as the Philosophical Science of Socio-Historical Relations’, Millennium (Vol. 26, No. 2, 1997), pp. 417-436.
6. Mark Neufeld, ‘The Dialectical Awakening in International Relations: For and Against’, Millennium (Vol. 26, No. 2, 1997), pp. 449-454.
7. Benno Teschke, ‘Geo-political Relations in the European Middle Ages: History and Theory’, International Organization (Vol. 52, No. 2, forthcoming 1998)
8. Kratochwil, International Organization, in note 3, p 438.
9. Heine and Teschke, International Organization, in note I, p. 400.
10. Neufeld, International Organization, in note 6, p. 449.
11. Kratochwil, International Organization, in note 3, p. 438.
12. Charles Taylor, Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 3-50.
13. Philip Windsor, ‘The Clock, the Context and Clausewitz’, Millennium (Vol. 6, No. 2. 1977), pp. 190-96.
14. Harald Homann, Gesetz und Wirklichkeit in den Soziahvissenschaftem: Vom Methodenstreit zum Positivismusstrei (Tubingen: A. Brenner, 1989).
15. Richard Bernstein, Praxis and Action (London: Duckworth, 1971), pp. 11-83.
16. Nicholas Lobkowicz, Theory and Practice: History of a Concept from Aristotle to Marx (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1967).
17. Albert and Lapid, Theory and Practice: History of a Concept from Aristotle to Marx, in note 2, p. 409
18. Karl Marx, ‘Theses on Feuerbach’, in Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles, Collected Works, Volume V: 1845-47 (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1976), pp. 3-8.
19. Bernstein, Collected Works, in note 14, pp. ix-xi.
20. Heine and Teschke, Collected Works, in note I, p. 412
21. Axel Honneth, ‘Work and Instrumental Action: On the Normative Basis of Critical Theory’, in Alex Honneth, The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995), pp. 15-49.
22. Karl Marx, ‘Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859)’ in Karl Marx, Early Writings, trans. R. Livingstone and G. Benton (London: Penguin Books, 1992), pp. 424-28.
23. Georgii Valentinovich Plekhanov, Fundamental Problems of Marxism (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1969)
24. Gerry A. Cohn, Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).
25. Arthur M. Printz, ‘Background and Ulterior Motive of Marx's Preface of 1859’, Journal of the History of Ideas (Vol. 30, No.3, 1969), pp. 437-50.
26. Heine and Teschke, Journal of the History of Ideas note I, p. 417.
27. Kratochwil, Journal of the History of Ideas, in note 3, pp. 439-40.
28. Bernstein, Journal of the History of Ideas. in note 14, p. 74.
29. Friedrich Kratochwil, Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1989), pp. 21-44
30. John Gerard Ruggie. ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations’. International Organization (Vol. 47, No. I, 1993), pp. 139-74.
31. Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society, Volume 1. trans. T. McCarthy (London: Heineman. 1984).
32. Jürgen Habermas. The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System—A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Volume 2. trans. T. McCarthy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987).
33. Harald Mülller, ‘Internationale Beziehungen als Kommunikatives Handeln’, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen (Vol. I, No. I, 1994), pp. 26-27
34. Neufeld. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, in note 6. p. 452.
35. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method (New York. NY: Seabury Press, 1975)
36. Jürgen Habermas, ‘The Hermeneutic Claim to Universality’, in Josef Bleicher (ed.), Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method. Philosophy, and Critique (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980). pp. 181-211
37. Jürgen Habermas, On the Logic of the Social Sciences, trans. Shieny Weber Nicholsen and Jerry A. Stark (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988). pp. 143-70
38. Jürgen Habermas, ‘A Philosophico-Political Profile’, in Peter Dews (ed.), Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jurgen Habermas (London: Verso, 1992), pp. 159-61.
39. Habermas, ‘A Philosophico-Political Profile’, Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jurgen Habermas in note 28, p. 181.
40. Heine and Teschke, Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jurgen Habermas in note I, p. 416.
41. Teschke, Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jurgen Habermas, in note 7.
42. Albert and Lapid. Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jurgen Habermas, in note 2, p. 410.
43. Justin Rosenberg, ‘The International Imagination: 1R Theory and “Classic Social Analysis”’, Millennium (Vol. 23, No. I, 1994), pp. 85-108
44. Ellen Meiksins Wood, ‘What is the Postmodern Agenda? An Introduction’, Monthly Review (Vol. 47, No. 3, 1995), pp. 1-12.
45. Tony Smith, Dialectical Social Theory and Its Critics: From Hegel to Analytical Marxism and Postmodernism (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1993), pp. 123-37.
46. Christopher Norris, The Truth about Postmodernism (Oxford: Blackwell. 1993).
47. David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989).
48. Albert and Lapid, The Condition of Postmodernity, in note 2, p. 410.
49. Anthony Giddens. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Cambridge and Oxford: Polity Press, 1984), p. xxi.
50. Derek Sayer, ‘Reinventing the Wheel: Anthony Giddens, Karl Marx and Social Change', in Jon Clark, Cecelia Modgil, and Sohan Modil (eds.), Anthony Giddens: Consensus and Controversy (London: Falnier Press, 1991), pp. 235-54
51. Heide Gerstenberger, ‘Handeln and Wandeln: Anmerkungen zu Anthony Giddens' “Theorestischer Konstitution der Gesellschaft”’. Prokla: Zeitschrift für Kritische Soziahvissenschaft (Vol. 18, No. 71, 1988), pp. 144-64.
52. Reinhard Meyers, ‘Virtuelle Scheingefechte im Ontologischen Cyberspace? Nachfragen zum Duktus und zum Gehalt einer Theoriedebatte’. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen (Vol. I, No. 1, 1994), p. 131.
53. Heine and Teschke, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen in note I, p. 412.
54. Sayer, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, note 29.
55. Albert and Lapid. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, in note 2, p. 410.
56. Heine and Teschke, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, in note 1, p. 417.
57. Albert and Lapid, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, in note 2, p. 409.
58. Kratochwil, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, in note 3, p. 441.
59. Robert Brenner, ‘The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism’, New Left Review (No. 104, 1977), pp. 25-92
60. Adam Smith [1776], An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of he Wealth of Nations (London: Everyman's Library, 1991)
61. Brenner, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of he Wealth of Nations, n note 47, pp. 28 and 47
62. Kratochwil, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of he Wealth of Nations, in note 23, pp. 257-62.
63. Chris Boyle, ‘Imagining the World Market: IPE and the Task of Social Theory’, Millennium (Vol. 23, No. 2. 1994), pp. 351-63.
64. Kratochwil, Millennium, in note 3, p. 439.
65. Theodor W. Adorno, ‘On the Logic of the Social Sciences’, in Theodor W. Adorno, Ralf Dahrendorf, Jürgen Habermas, Harald Pilot, and Karl R. Popper (eds.), The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, trans. G. Adey and D. Frisby (New York, NY, and London: Harper Torchbooks, 1976), p. 106
66. Alexander Wendt. ‘The Agent-Struclure Problem in International Relations Theory’. International Organization (Vol. 41. No. 3, 1987). pp. 335-70.
67. Alexander Wendt. ‘Anarchy Is What Slates Make of It: The Social Construction oI Power Politics’, International Organization (Vol. 46, No. 2, 1992), pp. 395-421.
68. Alexander Wendt. ‘Identity and Structural Change in International Politics', in Yosef Lapid and Friedrich Kratochwii (eds.), The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (Boulder, CO, and London: Lynne Rienner, 1996), pp. 47-64.
69. Erik Ringmar. ‘Alexander Wendt: A Social Scientist Struggling with History’, in Ivor B. Neumann and Ole Waever (eds). The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making? (London and New York. NY: Routledge. 1997). pp. 269-89.
70. Kratochwii. The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making?, in note 23.
71. Kratochwil, The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making?, in note 3, p. 440.
72. Friedrich Kratochwil, ‘Is the Ship of Culture at Sea or Returning?’, in Lapid and Kratochwil (eds.), The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making?, in note 54, p. 212, emphases added.
73. Karl Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume 1, trails. B. Fowkes (London: Penguin, 1990), pp. 159, 161, and 180
74. Ellen Meiksins Wood, ‘The Separation of the “Economic” and the “Political” in Capitalism’, in Ellen Meiksins Wood, Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 19-48.
75. Justin Rosenberg, The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations (London and New York, NY: Verso. 1994).
76. Krombach, The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations, in note 5, p. 419.
77. Neufeld, The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations in note 6, pp. 450.
78. Neufeld, The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations, in note 6, p. 452.
79. Krippendorff, The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations in note 4, pp. 444.
80. Mitchell G. Ash and Alfons Söllner (eds.), Forced Migration and Scientific Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).