The ‘Dialectical Awakening’ in International Relations: For and Against

Millennium - Journal of International Studies

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 449-454

  Neufeld, Mark ^a  

^a TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992776143     PISSN: 03058298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/03058298970260020401     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Mark Neufeld, The Restructuring of International Relations Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
2. Christian Heine and Benno Teschke. ‘Sleeping Beauty and the Dialectical Awakening: On the Potential of Dialectic for International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies (Vol. 25, No. 2, 1996), pp. 399-423.
3. Scott Warren, The Emergence of Dialectical Theory: Philosophy and Political Inquiry (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984).
4. Heine and Teschke, The Emergence of Dialectical Theory: Philosophy and Political Inquiry, in note 2, p. 402.
5. Robert L. Heilbroner, Marxism: For and Against (New York, NY: W.W. Norton, 1980), p. 39.
6. David Held, Introduction to Critical Theory; Horkheimer to Habermas (Berkeley. CA: University of California Press. 1980). pp. 183-89.
7. Seyla Benhabib, Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory (New York, NY; Columbia University Press, 1986).
8. Richard Berstein, The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge. MA: MIT Press, 1992), Chapter 10.
9. Heine and Teschke, The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity in note 2, p. 407.
10. Charles Taylor, Hegel and Modern Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), p. 64.
11. Mark Neufeld, ‘Reflexivity and International Relations Theory’, Millennium (Vol. 22, No. 1, 1993), pp. 53-76.
12. Neufeld, Millennium., in note I, Chapter 3.
13. David Held, Introduction to Critical Theory; Horkheimer to Habermas (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1980), p. 184.
14. Theodor Adorno, Against Epistemoiogy: A Metacritique. trans. W. Domingo (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983), p. 5.
15. Heine and Teschke. Against Epistemoiogy: A Metacritique in note 2, p. 405.
16. Neufeld, Against Epistemoiogy: A Metacritique, in note I, Chapter 5.
17. Robert Cox, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium (Vol. 10, No. 2, 1981), p. 128.
18. Bjorn Hettne (ed.), International Political Economy: Understanding Global Disorder (London: Zed Books, 1995).
19. Max Horkheimer, ‘Zum Rationalismusstreit in der gegenwörtigen Philosophic’. Zeitschrift für Soziaiforschung (Vol. 3. No. 1, 1934).
20. Held, Zeitschrift für Soziaiforschung, in note 17, p. 192.
21. Robert Cox, ‘On Thinking about Future World Order’, in Timothy Sinclair (ed), Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 66.
22. Heine and Teschke, Approaches to World Order, in note 2, p. 408.
23. Robert Gilpin. ‘The Richness of Political Realism’, in Robert O. Keohane (ed). Neorealism and its Critics (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1986). pp. 255-321.
24. Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony; Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984). pp. 41-46.