The Construct Validity of the Visual Similes Test II

Assessment for Effective Intervention

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 111-128

  Williams, Thomas Oliver ^a   Cox, Cynthia ^a   Eaves, Ronald C ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992816447     PISSN: 15345084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073724770002500203     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Algozzine, B., Eaves, R., Mann, L., & Vance, R.H. (1994). Slosson Full Range Intelligence Test. New York: Slosson Educational Publications.
2. Berlyne, D.E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Chapman, C.R., & Nakamura, Y. (1998). A bottom up view of emotion [on-line]. Available: http://www.phil.vt.edu/ASSC/watt/chapmanl.html
4. Cliff, N., & Pennell, R. (1967). The influence of communality, factor strength, and loading size on the sampling characteristics of factor loadings. Psychometrika, 32, 309–326.
5. Cox, C., Williams, T.O., & Eaves, R.C. (1998). The influence of age and the cognitive orienting response on IQ. Unpublished manuscript.
6. Eaves, R.C. (1993). A theory of human behavior. In R.C. Eaves & P.J. McLaughlin (Eds.), Recent advances in special education and rehabilitation (pp. 3–29). Boston: Andover Medical Publishers.
7. Eaves, R.C. (1995). The Visual Similes Test - Affective and Cognitive Forms. Opelika, AL: Small World.
8. Eaves, R.C. (1996). Definitions of affective and cognitive behavior. Working paper, Auburn University, AL
9. Eaves, R.C., & Darch, C. (1999). Attention to novelty, fear-anxiety, and age: Their effects on conduct problems. Unpublished manuscript.
10. Eaves, R.C., & Glen, R. (1996). Novelty, age, and IQ: A theoretical look at human preference for novelty. Diagnostique, 22, 1–20.
11. Fuster, J.M., & Uyeda, A.A. (1962). Facilitation of tachistoscopic performance by stimulation of midbrain tegmental points in the monkey. Experimental Neurology, 6, 384–406.
12. Galin, D., & Lacey, J.I. (1972). Reaction time and heart rate response pattern: Effects of reticular stimulation in rats. Physiology and Behavior, 8, 729–739.
13. Glen, R.M. (1994). Attention to novelty/ambiguity and its relationship to IQ and chronological age. Unpublished master's thesis, Auburn University.
14. Goodman, S.J. (1968). Visuo-motor reaction times and brain stem multiple-unit activity. Experimental Neurology, 22, 367–378.
15. Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Kinomura, S., Larsson, J., Gulyas, B., & Roland, P.E. (1996). Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei. Science, 271, 512–515.
17. Lindsley, D.B. (1958). Psychophysiology and perception. In Glaser, R (Ed.), Current trends in the description and analysis of behavior (pp. 48–91). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
18. Mogenson, G.J. (1977). The neurobiology of behavior: An introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Paviov, L.P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Pennell, R. (1968). The influence of communality and N on the sampling distributions of factor loadings. Psychometrika, 33, 423–439.
21. Revelle, W., & Loftus, D.A. (1992). The implications of arousal effects for the study of affect and memory. In S.A. Christianson (Ed.), Handbook of emotion and memory (pp. 113- 141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Rose, S.A., Feldman, J.F., Wallace, I.F., & Cohen, P. (1991). Language: A partial link between infant attention and later intelligence. Developmental Psychology, 27, 798–805.
23. Sokolov, E.N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan.
24. Spinks, J.A., & Siddle, D. (1983). The functional significance of the orienting response. In D. Siddle (Ed.), Orienting and habituation: Perspectives in human research (pp. 237–314). New York: Wiley.
25. StatView512+[software application]. (1986). Berkeley, CA: Abacus Concepts.
26. Thompson, L.A., Fagan, J.F., & Fulker, D.W. (1991). Longitudinal prediction of specific cognitive abilities from infant novelty preference. Child Development, 62, 530–538.
27. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1963). Methodology and scores of socioeconomic status. Working Paper No. 15. Washington, DC: Author.
28. Williams, P. (1996). The relationship between arousal, affect, and cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn University.
29. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. London: Wiley.