Litigating a free appropriate public education: The lovaas hearings and cases

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 205-214

  Yell, Mitchell L ^a   Drasgow, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034339983     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002246690003300403     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (1999). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (5th ed.). New York: Merrill.
2. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-97.
3. Baird, M. M. (1999). Legal issues in autism. Proceedings of the 20th National Institute on Legal Issues of Educating Individuals with Disabilities. Alexandria, VA: LRP Publications, Conference Division.
4. Barnett v. Fairfax County School Board, 927 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1991).
5. Board of Education of the Ann Arbor Public Schools, 24 IDELR 621 (SEA MI, 1996).
6. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
7. Board of Education v. Diamond, 808 F.2d 987 (3rd Cir. 1986).
8. Daniel R. R. v. State Board of Education, 874 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1989).
9. Deno, S. L. (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure, 36, 5-11.
10. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
11. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1990). Making educational research more important. Exceptional Children, 57, 102-107.
12. Gorn, D. (1996). What do I do when ⋯ The answer book on special education law. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
13. Hall v. Vance Board of Education, 774 F.2d 629 (4th Cir. 1985).
14. Heflin, L. J., & Simpson, R. L. (1998). Interventions for children and youth with autism: Prudent choices in a world of exaggerated claims and empty promises. Part 2: Legal/policy analysis and recommendations for selecting interventions and treatments. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 212-220.
15. Huefner, D. S. (1991). Judicial review of the special education program requirements under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Where have we been and where should we be going? Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 14, 483-516.
16. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
17. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
18. In re Child with Disabilities, 23 IDELR 471 (SEA CT 1995).
19. Jackson v. Franklin County School Board, 806 F.2d 623 (5th Cir. 1986).
20. Lachman v. Illinois State Board of Education, 852 F.2d 290 (7th Cir. 1988).
21. Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3-9.
22. Lovaas, O. I. (1993). The development of a treatment-research project for developmentally disabled and autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 26, 617-630.
23. Lovaas, O. I. (1996). The UCLA young autism model of service delivery. In C. Maurice, G. Green, & S. C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism: A manual for parents and professionals (pp. 241-248). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
24. Lovaas, O. I., Ackerman, A. B., Alexander, D., Firestone, P., Perkins, J., & Young, D. (1980). Teaching developmental disabled children: The me book. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
25. Mandaiwitz, M. (1996). Lovaas, TEACCH, and the public system: The court as referee. Proceedings of the 17th National Institute on Legal Issues of Educating Individuals with Disabilities. Alexandria, VA: LRP Publications, Conference Division.
26. McEachin, J. J., Smith, T., & Lovaas, O. I. (1993). Long-term outcome for children with autism who received early intensive behavioral treatment. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 97, 359-372.
27. Osborne, A. G. (1992). Legal standards for an appropriate education in the post-Rowley era. Exceptional Children, 58, 488-494.
28. Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F. 2d 171 (3rd Cir. 1988).
29. Roland M. v. Concord School Committee, 910 F.2d983 (1st Cir. 1990).
30. Smith, S. W. (1990). Individualized education programs (IEPs) in special education - From intent to acquiescence. Exceptional Children, 57, 6-14.
31. Snell, M. E. (1993). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (4th ed.). New York: Merrill.
32. Weatherly, C. (1998). Legal issues of autism and related disorders. Proceedings of the 19th National Institute on Legal Issues of Educating Individuals with Disabilities. Alexandria, VA: LRP Publications, Conference Division.
33. When methodologies collide. (1995, September 29). The Special Educator, 11(5), 1-4.
34. Yell, M. L. (1998). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
35. Yell, M. L., & Drasgow, E. (1999). A legal analysis of inclusion. Preventing School Failure, 43, 118-123.