Britain’s productivity gap with the United States and Europe: A historical perspective

National Institute Economic Review

Volumn 189, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 72-85

  Broadberry, Stephen ^a   O’mahony, Mary ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992782792     PISSN: 00279501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002795010418900108     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ames, E. and Rosenberg, N. (1968), ‘The Enfield Arsenal in theory and history’, Economic Journal, 78, pp. 827-842.
2. Atkinson, A.B. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1969), ‘A new view of technological change’, Economic Journal, 79, pp. 573-578.
3. Baily, M.N. and Chakrabarti, A.K. (1988), Innovation and the Productivity Crisis, Washington DC, Brookings Institution.
4. Baily, M.N. and Kirkegaard, J.F. (2004), Transforming the European Economy, Washington, Institute for International Economics(forthcoming).
5. Barjot, D. (ed.) (2002), Catching up with America: Productivity Missionsand the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence after theSecond World War, Paris, Presses del’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.
6. Barnes, M. (2004), ‘International comparisons of productivity:better data improve UK productivity position’, Office for National Statitics, www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/nojournal/Feb_ICP.pdf.
7. Basu, S., Fernald, J.G., Oulton, N. and Srinivasan, S. (2003), ‘The case of the missing productivity growth: or, doesinformation technology explain why productivity accelerated in the UnitedStates but not in the United Kingdom’, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 18.
8. Blundell, R., Griffiths, R. and van Reenan, J. (1999), ‘Market share, market valuation and innovation in a panel ofBritish manufacturing firms’, Review of Economic Studies, 66, pp. 529-554.
9. Bresnahan, T., Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (2002), ‘Information technology, workplace organization and the demandfor skilled labor: firm-level evidence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, pp. 339-376.
10. Bresnahan, T. and Trajtenberg, M. (1995), ‘General purpose technologies: engines of growth?’, Journal of Econometrics, 65, pp. 83-108.
11. Broadberry, S.N. (1993), ‘Manufacturing and the convergence hypothesis: what the long-rundata show’, Journal of Economic History, 53, pp. 772-795.
12. Broadberry, S.N. (1997a), The Productivity Race: British Manufacturing in International Perspective, 1850-1990, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
13. Broadberry, S.N. (1997b), ‘Forging ahead, falling behind and catching-up: a sectoralanalysis of Anglo-American productivity differences, 1870-1990’, Research in Economic History, 17, pp. 1-37.
14. Broadberry, S.N. (1997c), ‘Anglo-German productivity differences 1870-1990: a sectoral analysis’, European Review of Economic History, 1, pp. 247-267.
15. Broadberry, S.N. (1998), ‘How did the United States and Germany overtake Britain? Asectoral analysis of comparative productivity levels, 1870-1990’, Journal of Economic History, 58, pp. 375-407.
16. Broadberry, S.N. (2003), ‘Human capital and productivityperformance: Britain, the United States and Germany,1870-1990’, in David, P.A. and Thomas, M. (eds), The Economic Future in Historical Perspective, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 103-133.
17. Broadberry, S.N. (2004a), ‘The performance ofmanufacturing’, in Floud, R. and Johnson, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Volume 3:Structural Change, 1939-1999, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-83.
18. Broadberry, S.N. (2004b), ‘Explaining Anglo-German productivity differences in servicessince 1870’, European Review of Economic History, 8, (forthcoming).
19. Broadberry, S.N. and Crafts, N.F.R. (2003), ‘UK productivity performance from 1950 to 1979: a restatement ofthe Broadberry-Crafts View’, Economic History Review, 56, pp. 718-735.
20. Broadberry, S.N. and Ghosal, S. (2002), ‘From the counting house to the modern office: explainingAnglo-American productivity differences in services, 1870-1990’, Journal of Economic History, 62, pp. 967-998.
21. Broadberry, S.N. and Wagner, K. (1996), ‘Human capital and productivity inmanufacturing during the twentieth century: Britain, Germany and the UnitedStates’, in Crafts, N.F.R. and van Ark, B. (eds), Quantitative Aspects of Postwar European Economic Growth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 244-270.
22. Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (1996), ‘Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems’, Management Science, 42, pp. 541-558.
23. Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (2000), ‘Beyond computation: information technology, organizationaltransformation and business performance’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, pp. 23-48.
24. Carlin, W. (1996), ‘West German growth and institutions,1945-90’, in Crafts, N.F.R. and Toniolo, G. (eds), Economic Growth in Europe Since 1945, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 455-497.
25. Cette, G., Mairesse, J. and Kocoglu, Y. (2002), ‘Croissance économique et diffusion des TIC: le cas dela France sur longue période (1980-2000)’, Revue Française d’Économie, 16, pp. 155-192.
26. Channon, D.F. (1973), The Strategy and Structure of BritishEnterprise, London, Macmillan.
27. Colecchia, A. and Schreyer, P. (2001), ‘ICT investment and economic growth in the1990s: is the United States a unique case?’, Paris, OECD.
28. Committee of Public Accounts (2002), ‘New IT systems formagistrates’ courts: the Libra Project’, Treasury Minutes of the Forty-third to the Forty-sixth Reports for theCommittee of Public Accounts 2001-02, Cm5393, London, HMSO.
29. Committee of Public Accounts (2004), ‘The cancellation of the BenefitsPayment Card’, Treasury Minutes of the First to ThirdReports for the Committee of Public Accounts 2002-03, Cm6105, London, HMSO.
30. Cowling, K., Stoneman, P., Cubbin, J., Cable, J, Hall, G., Domberger, S. and Dutton, P. (1980), Mergers and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
31. Crafts, N.F.R. (2004), ‘Fifty years of economic growth in Western Europe: no longercatching up but falling behind?’, World Economics, 5, pp. 131-145.
32. David, P.A. (1975), Technical Choice, Innovation and EconomicGrowth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
33. Denison, E.P. (1967), Why Growth Rates Differ: Postwar Experience in NineWestern Countries, Washington DC, Brookings Institution.
34. Dertouzos, M.L., Lester, R.K., Solow, R.M. and the MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity (1989), Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge, Cambridge MA., MIT Press.
35. Dore, R. (2000), Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism. Japanand Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
36. Dyas, G.P. and Thanheiser, H.T. (1976), The Emerging European Enterprise, London, Macmillan.
37. Edquist, C. and Jacobsson, S. (1988), Flexible Automation: The Global Diffusion ofTechnology in the Engineering Industry, Oxford, Blackwell.
38. Field, A.J. (2004), ‘US productivity growth in the interwarperiod and the 1990s’, http://www.unc.edu/depts/econ/seminars/Field.pdf.
39. Freeman, C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessonsfrom Japan, London, Pinter.
40. Groningen Growth and Development Centre and The Conference Board (2004), ‘Total economy database’, http://www.ggdc.net.
41. Gust, C. and Marquez, J. (2002), ‘International comparisons of productivitygrowth: the role of information technology and regulatorypractices’, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System InternationalFinance Discussion Paper No.727.
42. Habakkuk, H.J. (1962), American and British Technology in the NineteenthCentury, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
43. Helpman, E. (ed.) (1998), General Purpose Technologies and EconomicGrowth, Cambridge, MA., MIT Press.
44. HM Treasury (2000), Productivity in the UK: The Evidence and theGovernment’s Approach, London, HMSO(www.hm-treasury.gov.uk).
45. Hutton, G. (1953), We Too Can Prosper, London, Allen & Unwin.
46. Inklaar, R., O’Mahony, M, and Timmer, M. (2003), ‘ICT and Europe’s productivityperformance: industry-level growth accounting comparisons with the UnitedStates’, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, Research Memorandum GD-68.
47. Jarvis, V. and Prais, S.J. (1989), ‘Two nations of shopkeepers: training for retailing in France and Britain’, National Institute Economic Review, 128, pp. 58-74.
48. Jorgenson, D. W. and Stiroh, K (2000), ‘Raising the speed limit: U.S. economic growth in the information age’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp. 125-211.
49. Layard, R. (2003), ‘Happiness: has social science aclue?’, Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures, London School of Economics, http://cep.lse.ac.uk/layard/.
50. McKinsey Global Institute (1998), Driving Productivity and Growth in the UK,available at http://www.mckinsey.com/.
51. McKinsey Global Institute (2002), US Productivity Growth 1995-2000, summaryavailable at http://www.mckinsey.com/.
52. Maddison, A. (1995), Monitoring the World Economy, 1820-1992, Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operationand Development.
53. Maddison, A. (2001), The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective, Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operationand Development.
54. Mason, G., Keltner, B. and Wagner, K. (2000), ‘Productivity and service quality inbanking: commercial lending in Britain, the United States andGermany’, in Barrell, R., Mason, G. and O’Mahony, M. (eds), Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 117-148.
55. Meeks, G. (1977), Disappointing Marriage: A Study of the Gains fromMerger, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
56. Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1990), ‘The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy and organisation’, American Economic Review, 80, pp. 511-528.
57. Nickell, S.J. (1996), ‘Competition and corporate performance’, Journal of Political Economy, 104, pp. 724-746.
58. North, D.G. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and EconomicPerformance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
59. OECD (2003), The Sources of Economic Growth in OECDCountries, Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operationand Development.
60. Oliner, S. and Sichel, D. (2000), ‘The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: is informationtechnology the story?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), pp. 3-22.
61. Oliver, N. and Wilkinson, B. (1992), The Japanization of British Industry: NewDevelopments in the 1990s (2nd edition), Oxford, Blackwell.
62. O’Mahony, M. (1999), Britain’s Productivity Performance1950-1996: An International Perspective, London, National Institute of Economic andSocial Research.
63. O’Mahony, M. and van Ark, B. (2003), EU Productivity and Competitiveness: An IndustryPerspective. Can Europe Resume the Catching-up Process?, European Commission, Enterprise Publications.
64. O’Mahony, M. and de Boer, W. (2002), ‘Britain’s relative productivityperformance: updates to 1999’, Final Report to DTI/Treasury/ONS, mimeograph.
65. O’Mahony, M., Oulton, N. and Vass, J. (1998), ‘Market services: productivity benchmarks for the UK’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60,pp. 529-551.
66. Oulton, N, (2001), ‘ICT and productivity growth in the UnitedKingdom’, Bank of England Working Paper, No. 140.
67. Prais, S.J. (1995), Productivity, Education and Training: AnInternational Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
68. Prais, S.J., Jarvis, V. and Wagner, K. (1989), ‘Productivity and vocational skills in services in Britain andGermany: hotels’, National Institute Economic Review, 130, pp. 52-74.
69. Rosenberg, N. (ed.) (1969), The American System of Manufactures: The Reportof the Committee on the Machinery of the United States 1855 and the SpecialReports of George Wallis and Joseph Whitworth 1854, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
70. Rostas, L. (1948), Comparative Productivity in British and AmericanIndustry, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
71. Shadwell, A. (1906), Industrial Efficiency: A Comparative Study ofIndustrial Life in England, Germany and America, London, Longmans, Green.
72. Soskice, D.W. (1994), ‘Reconciling markets and institutions:the German apprenticeship system’, in Lynch, L.M. (ed.), Training and the Private Sector: International Comparisons, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 25-60.
73. Smith, A.D., Hitchens, D.M.W.N. and Davies, S.W. (1982), International Industrial Productivity: A Comparisonof Britain, America and Germany, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
74. Triplett, J.E. and Bosworth, B.P. (2003), ‘Productivity measurement in service industries:“Baumol’s Disease” has been cured’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 9(3), pp. 23-33.
75. Turner, G. (1969), Business in Britain, London, Eyre and Spottiswoode.
76. Williams, E.E. (1896), Made in Germany, London, Heinemann.