Assuming it is all about conditions. Framing a simulation model for complex, adaptive urban space

Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1019-1039

  Yamu, Claudia ^a   de Roo, Gert ^a   Frankhauser, Pierre ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptive planning; complex systems; non linearity; spatial modelling

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; MODELING; SIMULATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 84992731477     PISSN: 02658135     EISSN: 14723417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0265813515607858     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alexander C, (1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M, (1977) A Pattern Language, New York: Oxford University.
3. Alexander ER, (1984) After rationalism, what?; a review of responses to paradigm breakdown. Journal of the American Planning Association 50: 62–69.
4. Batty M, (2005) Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models and Fractals, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5. Batty M, Kim S, (1992) Form follows function: Reformulating urban population density functions. Urban Studies 29: 1043–1070.
6. Batty M, Longley P, (1994) Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function, London: Academic Press.
7. Batty M, Marshall S, (2012) The origins of complexity theory in cities and planning. In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, (eds) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age, Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London/New York: Springer, pp. 21–46.
8. Batty M, Xie Y, (1996) Preliminary evidence for a theory of the fractal city. Environment and Planning A 28: 1745–1762.
9. Batty M, Xie Y, (1999) Self-organized criticality and urban development. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 3: 109–124.
10. Blowers A, Hamnett C, Sarre P, (1974) The Future of Cities, London: Hutchinson Educational.
11. Boelens and De Roo G (2015) Spatial planning in a complex unpredictable world of change: Towards a proactive co-evolutionary type of planning. InPlanning, Groningen, NL
12. Bourdieu P (1972) Esquisse d´une théorie de la pratique, précérdé de trois etudes d´ethnologie kabyle. Switzerland: Librairie Droz [Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977)]. New York: Cambridge University Press
13. Dendrinos DS, Sonis M, (1990) Chaos and Socio-spatial Dynamics, New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. De Roo G, (2010) Being or becoming? That is the question! confronting complexity with contemporary planning theory. In: De Roo G, Silva E, (eds) A Planner’s Encounter with Complexity, Farnham, UK: Ashgate, pp. 19–40.
15. De Roo G, (2012) Spatial planning, complexity and a world ‘out of equilibrium’: Outline of a non-linear approach to planning. In: De Roo G, Hillier J, Van Wezemael J, (eds) Complexity and Planning – Systems, Assemblages and Simulations, Farnham, UK: Ashgate, pp. 141–176.
16. De Roo G, (2015) Going for plan B – Conditioning adaptive planning: about urban planning and institutional design in a non-linear, complex world. In: Geyer R, Cairney P, (eds) Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 349–368.
17. De Roo G, Rauws W, (2012) Positioning planning in the world of order, chaos and complexity: On perspectives, behaviour and interventions in a non-linear environment. In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, (eds) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning and Design, Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London/New York: Springer, pp. 207–220.
18. Fontana W, Buss LW, (1996) The barrier of objects: From dynamical systems to bounded organizations. In: Casti J, Karlqvist A, (eds) Boundaries and Barriers, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19. Frankhauser P (1994) La Fractalité de Structures Urbaines [The Fractality of Urban Structures]. Paris: Anthropos
20. Frankhauser P (1998) The fractal approach: A new tool for the spatial analysis of urban agglomerations. Population, an English selection, pp. 205–240
21. Frankhauser P (2000) La fragmentation des espaces urbains et périurbains: une approche fractale. In: Derycke PH (ed.) Structure des villes, entreprises et marchés urbains, sous la direction de. Paris: Harmattan, pp. 25–50
22. Frankhauser P, (2008) Fractal geometry for measuring and modeling urban patterns. In: Albeverio S, Andrey S, Giordano P, (eds) The Dynamics of Complex Urban Systems – An interdisciplinary Approach, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 241–243.
23. Frankhauser P, Pumain D, (2007) Fractals and geography. In: Sanders L, (ed.) Models in Spatial Analysis. Geographical information systems series. London: Wiley-ISTE, pp.281–300.
24. Freeman L, (2001) The effects of sprawl on neighborhood social ties: An explanatory analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 67(1): 69–77.
25. Fruin JJ (1971) Designing for pedestrians: A level-of-service concept. Highways Research Record. Number 355, Pedestrians, Washington DC: Highway Research Board, pp. 1–15
26. Gell-Mann M, (1994) The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex, San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman.
27. Haken H, (1982) Synergetik, Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
28. Haken H, (2012) Complexity and complexity theories: Do these concepts make sense? In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, (eds) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning and Design, Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London/New York: Springer, pp. 7–20.
29. Hancock T, (1976) Growth and Change in the Future City Region, London: Leonard Hill.
30. Healey P, (1992) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review 63(2): 143–162.
31. Hermanns EW and De Roo G (2006) LILA en de Planologie van de Contramal – De ruimtelijk-economische ontwikkeling van Noord-Nederland krijgt een eigen kleur [LILAC and the planning of Complementarity – Spatial economic developments in the North of the Netherlands gets its own colour]. Assen, NL: InBoekvorm
32. Hillier J, (2007) Stretching Beyond the Horizon – A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
33. Hillier J, (2013) On relationality and uncertainty. dISP – The Planning Review 194(49): 32–39.
34. Holland J, (1992) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Holland J, (1999) Emergence: From Chaos to Order, Reading, UK: Perseus Books.
36. Jacobs J, (1961) The Death and Life of American Cities, New York: Random House.
37. Kropf KS, (2001) Conceptions of change in the built environment. Urban Morphology 5(1): 29–42.
38. Mandelbrot B, (1982) The Fractal Geometry of Nature, New York: WH Freeman.
39. Nicolis G, Prigogine I, (1977) Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems, New York: Wiley-Interscience.
40. Nienhuis I (2014) Vrijheid, gelijkwaardigheid en bevoogding. Over bewonersparticipatie in het stimuleren van sociale weerbaarheid in wijken [Liberty, equality and patronizing. About citizen participation in stimulating social resilience in neighbourhoods, PhD thesis, University of Groningen
41. Podobnik B, (2002) New urbanism and the generation of social capital: Evidence from Orenco Station. National Civic Review 91(3): 245–255.
42. Popper K, (1957) Wissenschaft: Vermutungen und Widerlegungen [Suppositions and Refutations]. In: Popper K, (ed.) Vermutungen und Widerlegungen. Das Wachstum der wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis. [Suppositions and refutations: growth in scientific knowledge]. Tübingen: Teilband 1, pp.46–95.
43. Portugali J, (2005) Complex Artificial Environments. Simulation, Cognition and VR in the Study and Planning of Cities, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
44. Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, (2012) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age, Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
45. Pumain D, (2006) Alternative explanations of hierarchical differentiation in urban systems. In: Pumain D, (ed.) Hierarchy in Natural and Social Sciences, Dordrecht, NL: Springer, pp. 169–222.
46. Rittel H, (1972) On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the ‘first and second generations’. Bedriftskonomen 8: 390–396.
47. Rittel HWJ, Webber M, (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.
48. Rodwin L, (1960) The Future Metropolis, New York: George Braziller.
49. Qin Y, Liu K, (2004) Advances in applied studies of fractal theory in geography in China. Journal of Geographical Science 14: 62–68.
50. Salingaros N, (2005) Principles of Urban Structure, Delft: Techne Press.
51. Shen G, (2002) Fractal dimension and fractal growth of urbanized areas. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16: 419–437.
52. Solvit S, (2012) Dimensions of War: Understanding War as a Complex Adaptive System, Paris: L’Harmattan.
53. Stacey R, (2003) Complexity and Group Processes: A Radically Social Understanding of Individuals, Hove/New York: Brunner-Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
54. Stalman HJ and Wiersma A (2001) Openbare ruimte in Fryslân – 20 jaar Regionaal Orgaan verkeersveiligheid Fryslân [Public space in Fryslân – 20 years Regional Body Traffic Savety Fryslân]. Leeuwarden (NL): ROV Fryslân
55. Steadman P, (1979) The Evolution of Designs. Biological Analogy in Architecture and Applied Arts, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56. Thomas I, Frankhauser P, (2013) Fractal dimension of the built-up footprint: buildings versus roads, fractal evidence from Antwerp (Belgium). Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 40: 310–329.
57. Thomas I, Frankhauser P, Frenay B, (2010) Clustering patterns of urban built-up areas with curves of fractal scaling behaviour. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37: 942–954.
58. Thomas I, Tannier C, Frankhauser P, (2008) Is there a link between fractal dimension and residential environment at a regional level? Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography 413. Available at: http://cybergeo.revues.org (accessed 17 July 2015).
59. Ullman EL (1956) The role of transportation and the bases for interaction. In: Thomas WL (ed.) Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 862–880
60. Ullman EL (1980) Geography as spatial interaction. In: Boyce RR (ed.) Geography as Spatial Interaction. Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 13–27
61. Waldrop MM, (1992) Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, New York: Simon and Schuster.
62. Weidlich W, (1987) Sociodynamics: A Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in Social Sciences, London: Harwood Academic.
63. White R, Engelen G, (1993) Fractal urban land use patterns: A cellular automata approach. Environment and Planning A 25: 1175–1199.
64. Wolfram S, (2002) A New Kind of Science, Champaign, IL: Wolfram.
65. Yamu C, (2014) It is simply complex(ity). Modelling and simulation in the light of decision-making, emergent structures and a world of non-linearity. disP – The Planning Review 50(4): 43–53.
66. Yamu C and Frankhauser P (2013) Development of sustainable metropolitan areas using a multi-scale decision support system. Fractalopolis model – Accessibility, evaluation and morphological rules. Working paper, hal-00837493, 74p
67. Yamu C, Frankhauser P, (2015) Spatial accessibility to amenities, natural areas and urban green spaces: Using a multiscale, multifractal simulation model for managing urban sprawl. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42: 25p. DOI: 10.1068/b130171p.
68. Yamu C, Voigt A, Frankhauser P, (2015) Spatial simulation and the real world. Digital methods and techniques in the context of strategic planning. In: Silva E, Healey P, Harris N, (eds) Research Methods in Spatial Planning, New York and London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 348–363.