Spatial accessibility to amenities, natural areas and urban green spaces: using a multiscale, multifractal simulation model for managing urban sprawl

Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1054-1078

  Yamu, Claudia ^a   Frankhauser, Pierre ^b  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

Author keywords

accessibility; amenities; cities; landscape; multifractal simulation; regions; scenarios

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; AGGLOMERATION; AMENITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GREENSPACE; NEIGHBORHOOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 84946600284     PISSN: 02658135     EISSN: 14723417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/b130171p     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. F.Auerbach (1913) Das Gesetz der Bevölkerungskonzentration”. Petermans Mitteilungen59: 74–76
2. M.Batty (2013) The New Science of Cities, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
3. M.BattyP.Longley (1986) “The fractal simulation of urban structure”. Environment and Planning A18: 1143–1179
4. M.BattyP.Longley (1994) Fractal Cities. A Geometry of Form and Function, London: Academic Press
5. M.BattyY.Xie (1999) “Self-organized criticality and urban development”. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society3: 109–124
6. B.BolitzerN.R.Netusil (2000) “The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon”. Journal of Environmental Management59: 185–193
7. M.BonaiutoF.FormaraM.Bonnes (2003) “Index of perceived residential environmental quality and neighbourhood attachment in the urban environment; a confirmatory study on the city of Rome”. Landscape and Urban Planning65: 41–52
8. M.Breheny (1997) “Urban compaction: feasible and acceptable?”. Cities14: 209–217
9. P.Calthorpe (1993) The Next American Metropolis. Ecology, Community and the American Dream, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press
10. P.CalthorpeW.Fulton (2001) The Regional City: Planning for the End of Sprawl, Washington DC: Island Press
11. W.Christaller (1933) Die Zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Eine ökonomisch-geographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmäßigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit Städtischer Funktion, Jena: Fischer
12. Czerkauer-Yamu C, Frankhauser P, 2011, “A planning concept for a sustainable development of metropolitan areas based on a multifractal approach” Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquium on Quantitative and Theoretical Geography,107-114
13. Czerkauer-Yamu C, Frankhauser P, 2013, “Development of sustainable metropolitan areas using a multiscale decision support system. Fractalopolis model—accessibility, evaluation and morphological rules” WP HALSHS, hal-00837515, http://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/PubDat_218633.pdf
14. E.M.De ClerqR.De WulfA.Van Herzele (2006) “Relating spatial pattern of forest cover to accessibility”. Landscape and Urban Planning80: 14–22
15. G.De Roo (2012) “Spatial planning, complexity and a world ‘out of equilibrium’: outline of a non-linear approach to planning”. In: G.De RooJ.HillierJ.Van Wezemael (eds) Complexity and Planning—Systems, Assemblages and Simulations, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, pp. 141–176
16. R.M.Feldman (1990) “Settlement-identity: psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society”. Environment and Behaviour22: 183–229
17. P.Frankhauser (1994) La Fractalité des Structures Urbaines, Paris: Anthropos
18. P.Frankhauser (2008) “Fractal geometry for measuring and modelling urban patterns”. In: S.AlbeverioD.AndreyP.GiordanoA.Vancheria (eds) The Dynamics of Complex Urban Systems—An Interdisciplinary Approach, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 241–243
19. Frankhauser P, 2012, “The Fractalopolis model—a sustainable approach for a central place system”, WP HALSHS hal-00758864, http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00758864/document
20. Gault G, Bedeau L, 2007, “Les Français et leur habitat. Perception de la densité et de formes d'habitat”, TNS Sofres, Département Stratégies d'Opinion/Société
21. K.T.GeursB.van Wee (2006) “Ex-post evaluation of thirty years of compact urban development in the Netherlands”. Urban Studies43: 139–160
22. P.GordonH.Richardson (1997) “Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?”. Journal of the American Planning Association63: 95–106
23. Guo J, Bhat C, 2002, “Residential location modeling: accommodating sociodemographic, school quality accessibility effects”, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/bhat/home.html
24. M.Hillman (1996) “In favour of the compact city”. In: M.JenksE.BurtonK.Williams (eds) Compact City. A Sustainable Form?, London: Spon, pp. 36–65
25. M.JenksE.BurtonK.Williams (1996) The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?, London: Spon
26. N.F.Johnson (2007) Simply Complexity. A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory, Oxford: Oneworld Publications
27. D.M.LevinsonA.Kumar (1994) “The rational locator: why travel times have remained stable”. Journal of the American Planning Association60: 319–332
28. B.Mandelbrot (1982) The Fractal Geometry of Nature, San Francisco, CA: Freeman
29. P.W.G.NewmanJ.R.Kenworthy (1989) Cities and Automobile Dependence, Brookfield, VT: Gower
30. D.Pumain (2006) Hierarchy in Natural and Social Sciences, Dordrecht: Springer
31. Salingaros N, 2003, “Connecting the fractal city, Keynote Speech, 5th Biennial of Towns and Town Planners in Europe, Barcelona, April, http://www.math.utsa.edu/~yxk833/connecting.html
32. N.Salingaros (2005) Principles of Urban Structure, Delft: Techne Press
33. T.SchwanenM.DijstF.M.Dieleman (2004) “Policies for urban form and their impact on travel: the Netherlands experience”. Urban Studies41: 579–603
34. G.Shen (2002) “Fractal dimension and fractal growth of urbanized areas”. International Journal of Geographical Information Science16: 437–519
35. T.SmithG.LangeW.Marks (1996) “Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology—dimension, lacunarity and multifractals”. Journal of Neuroscience Methods69: 123–136
36. Tannier C, Pumain D, 2005, “Fractals in urban geography” Cybergeo: Revue Européenne de Géographie article 307, http://cybergeo.revues.org/3275
37. C.TannierG.VuidelH.HouotP.Frankhauser (2012) “Spatial accessibility to amenities in fractal and nonfractal urban patterns”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39: 801–819
38. I.ThomasP.FrankhauserC.Biermacki (2008) “The morphology of built-up landscapes in Wallonia, Belgium: a classification using fractal indices”. Landscape and Urban Planning84: 99–115
39. I.ThomasP.FrankhauserD.Badariotti (2012) “Comparing the fractality of European urban neighbourhoods: do national contexts matter?”. Journal of Geographical Systems14: 189–208
40. H.J.ZimmermannP.Zysno (1983) “Decisions and evaluations by hierarchical aggregation of information”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems10: 243–260
41. G.Zipf (1949) Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort, Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley