Management of Renal Masses and Localized Renal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Urology

Volumn 196, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 989-999

  Pierorazio, Phillip M ^a   Johnson, Michael H ^a   Patel, Hiten D ^a   Sozio, Stephen M ^a,b   Sharma, Ritu ^c   Iyoha, Emmanuel ^c   Bass, Eric B ^c   Allaf, Mohamad E ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

carcinoma, renal cell; comparative effectiveness research; disease management; kidney neoplasms; surgical procedures, operative

Indexed keywords

AGE; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SPECIFIC SURVIVAL; CANCER SURGERY; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COMORBIDITY ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; END STAGE RENAL DISEASE; ESTIMATED GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; LOCAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; META ANALYSIS; METASTASIS FREE SURVIVAL; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TUMOR ABLATION; CANCER STAGING; GLOBAL HEALTH; INCIDENCE; KIDNEY; PATHOLOGY; RENAL CELL CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRENDS;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; GLOBAL HEALTH; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASM STAGING; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84992724086     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.081     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. 1 Kutikov, A., Fossett, L.K., Ramchandani, P., et al. Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. Urology, 68, 2006, 737.
2. 2 Thompson, R.H., Hill, J.R., Babayev, Y., et al. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma risk according to tumor size. J Urol, 182, 2009, 41.
3. 3 Lane, B.R., Babineau, D., Kattan, M.W., et al. A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7 cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy. J Urol, 178, 2007, 429.
4. 4 American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2014. 2014, American Cancer Society, Atlanta Available at http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/cancerfactsfigures2014/ Accessed September 24, 2014.
5. 5 Campbell, S.C., Novick, A.C., Belldegrun, A., et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol, 182, 2009, 1271.
6. 6 Ljungberg, B., Cowan, N.C., Hanbury, D.C., et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol, 58, 2010, 398.
7. 7 National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines_nojava.asp. Accessed September 24, 2014.
8. 8 Van Poppel, H., Da Pozzo, L., Albrecht, W., et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol, 59, 2011, 543.
9. 9 Pierorazio, P.M., Johnson, M.H., Patel, H.D., et al. Management of Renal Masses and Localized Renal Cancer. 2016, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.
10. 10 Higgins, J.P., Green, S., Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0. 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford Available at http://handbook.cochrane.org Accessed September 24, 2014.
11. 11 Cochrane: Risk of Bias Assessment Tool: for Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ACROBATNRSI), version 1.0.0. Available at http://www.riskofbias.info. Accessed September 24, 2014.
12. 12 Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. AHRQ publication No. 10(14)-EHC063-EF, 2014, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland Available at http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov Accessed September 24, 2014.
13. 13 Lucas, S.M., Stern, J.M., Adibi, M., et al. Renal function outcomes in patients treated for renal masses smaller than 4 cm by ablative and extirpative techniques. J Urol, 179, 2008, 75.
14. 14 Antonelli, A., Ficarra, V., Bertini, R., et al. Elective partial nephrectomy is equivalent to radical nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: results of a retrospective, comparative, multi-institutional study. BJU Int, 109, 2012, 1013.
15. 15 Barbalias, G.A., Liatsikos, E.N., Tsintavis, A., et al. Adenocarcinoma of the kidney: nephron-sparing surgical approach vs. radical nephrectomy. J Surg Oncol, 72, 1999, 156.
16. 16 Bedke, J., Pritsch, M., Buse, S., et al. Prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma by tumor size. J Urol, 180, 2008, 62.
17. 17 Gratzke, C., Seitz, M., Bayrle, F., et al. Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int, 104, 2009, 470.
18. 18 Thompson, R.H., Siddiqui, S., Lohse, C.M., et al. Partial versus radical nephrectomy for 4 to 7 cm renal cortical tumors. J Urol, 182, 2009, 2601.
19. 19 Iizuka, J., Kondo, T., Hashimoto, Y., et al. Similar functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b and T1a renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol, 19, 2012, 980.
20. 20 Indudhara, R., Bueschen, A.J., Urban, D.A., et al. Nephron-sparing surgery compared with radical nephrectomy for renal tumors: current indications and results. South Med J, 90, 1997, 982.
21. 21 Kopp, R.P., Mehrazin, R., Palazzi, K.L., et al. Survival outcomes after radical and partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumours categorised by R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. BJU Int, 114, 2014, 708.
22. 22 Kyung, Y.S., You, D., Kwon, T., et al. The type of nephrectomy has little effect on overall survival or cardiac events in patients of 70 years and older with localized clinical t1 stage renal masses. Korean J Urol, 55, 2014, 446.
23. 23 Lane, B.R., Fergany, A.F., Weight, C.J., et al. Renal functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy with extended ischemic intervals are better than after radical nephrectomy. J Urol, 184, 2010, 1286.
24. 24 Li, J.R., Yang, C.R., Cheng, C.L., et al. Partial nephrectomy in the treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma: experience of Taichung Veterans General Hospital. J Chin Med Assoc, 70, 2007, 281.
25. 25 Mariusdottir, E., Jonsson, E., Marteinsson, V.T., et al. Kidney function following partial or radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study. Scand J Urol, 47, 2013, 476.
26. 26 Medina-Polo, J., Romero-Otero, J., Rodríguez-Antolín, A., et al. Can partial nephrectomy preserve renal function and modify survival in comparison with radical nephrectomy?. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 45, 2011, 143.
27. 27 Milonas, D., Skulčius, G., Baltrimavičius, R., et al. Comparison of long-term results after nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy in treating 4- to 7-cm renal cell carcinoma. Medicina (Kaunas), 49, 2013, 223.
28. 28 Minervini, A., Serni, S., Tuccio, A., et al. Simple enucleation versus radical nephrectomy in the treatment of pT1a and pT1b renal cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 19, 2012, 694.
29. 29 Mitchell, R.E., Gilbert, S.M., Murphy, A.M., et al. Partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy offer similar cancer outcomes in renal cortical tumors 4 cm or larger. Urology, 67, 2006, 260.
30. 30 Patard, J.J., Shvarts, O., Lam, J.S., et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol, 171, 2004, 2181.
31. 31 Roos, F.C., Brenner, W., Jäger, W., et al. Perioperative morbidity and renal function in young and elderly patients undergoing elective nephron-sparing surgery or radical nephrectomy for renal tumours larger than 4 cm. BJU Int, 107, 2011, 554.
32. 32 Roos, F.C., Brenner, W., Thomas, C., et al. Functional analysis of elective nephron-sparing surgery vs radical nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm. Urology, 79, 2012, 607.
33. 33 Uchida, K., Takahashi, A., Masumori, N., et al. Partial nephrectomy for small localized renal cell carcinoma. Hinyokika Kiyo, 50, 2004, 389.
34. 34 Uzzo, R.G., Wei, J.T., Hafez, K., et al. Comparison of direct hospital costs and length of stay for radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery in the management of localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology, 54, 1999, 994.
35. 35 Weight, C.J., Lythgoe, C., Unnikrishnan, R., et al. Partial nephrectomy does not compromise survival in patients with pathologic upstaging to pT2/pT3 or high-grade renal tumors compared with radical nephrectomy. Urology, 77, 2011, 1142.
36. 36 Weight, C.J., Larson, B.T., Fergany, A.F., et al. Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses. J Urol, 183, 2010, 1317.
37. 37 Deklaj, T., Lifshitz, D.A., Shikanov, S.A., et al. Laparoscopic radical versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1bN0M0 renal tumors: comparison of perioperative, pathological, and functional outcomes. J Endourol, 24, 2010, 1603.
38. 38 Kim, F.J., Rha, K.H., Hernandez, F., et al. Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy: assessment of complications. J Urol, 170, 2003, 408.
39. 39 Shinohara, N., Harabayashi, T., Sato, S., et al. Impact of nephron-sparing surgery on quality of life in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol, 39, 2001, 114.
40. 40 Janetschek, G., Jeschke, K., Peschel, R., et al. Laparoscopic surgery for stage T1 renal cell carcinoma: radical nephrectomy and wedge resection. Eur Urol, 38, 2000, 131.
41. 41 McKiernan, J., Simmons, R., Katz, J., et al. Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy. Urology, 59, 2002, 816.
42. 42 Chang, X., Zhang, F., Liu, T., et al. Radiofrequency ablation versus partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma: long-term clinical and oncologic outcomes. J Urol, 193, 2015, 430.
43. 43 Klatte, T., Mauermann, J., Heinz-Peer, G., et al. Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of laparoscopic renal cryoablation and open partial nephrectomy: a matched pair analysis. J Endourol, 25, 2011, 991.
44. 44 Stern, J.M., Svatek, R., Park, S., et al. Intermediate comparison of partial nephrectomy and radiofrequency ablation for clinical T1a renal tumours. BJU Int, 100, 2007, 287.
45. 45 Tanagho, Y.S., Bhayani, S., Kim, E.H., et al. Renal cryoablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Washington University long-term experience. J Endourol, 27, 2013, 1477.
46. 46 Mues, A.C., Korets, R., Graversen, J.A., et al. Clinical, pathologic, and functional outcomes after nephron-sparing surgery in patients with a solitary kidney: a multicenter experience. J Endourol, 26, 2012, 1361.
47. 47 Thompson, R.H., Atwell, T., Schmit, G., et al. Comparison of partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation for cT1 renal masses. Eur Urol, 67, 2015, 252.
48. 48 Youn, C.S., Park, J.M., Lee, J.Y., et al. Comparison of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and open partial nephrectomy in patients with a small renal mass. Korean J Urol, 54, 2013, 603.
49. 49 Guillotreau, J., Haber, G.P., Autorino, R., et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass. Eur Urol, 61, 2012, 899.
50. 50 Bensalah, K., Zeltser, I., Tuncel, A., et al. Evaluation of costs and morbidity associated with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating small renal tumours. BJU Int, 101, 2008, 467.