Fram in FSA—Introducing a function-based approach to the formal safety assessment framework

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Volumn 484, Issue , 2017, Pages 399-411

  Praetorius, Gesa ^a   Graziano, Armando ^a   Schröder Hinrichs, Jens Uwe ^a   Baldauf, Michael ^a  

^a WORLD MARITIME UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Formal safety assessment; Functional resonance analysis method (FRAM); Hazard identification; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

FAULT TREE ANALYSIS; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; HAZARDS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; RISK PERCEPTION; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

COMPLEMENTARY TOOLS; FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; FUNCTION-BASED APPROACH; FUNCTIONAL RESONANCE ANALYSIS METHODS (FRAM); HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; MARITIME SAFETY; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; RELATED FACTORS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84992622994     PISSN: 21945357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_34     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. IMO: Revised guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. IMO document MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.12. International Maritime Organization (2013)
2. Soares, C.G., Teixeira, A.P.: Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 74, 299–309 (2001)
3. Sames, P.C.: Introduction to risk-based approaches in the maritime industry. In: Papanikolaou, A.D. (ed.) Risk-Based Ship Design. Methods, Tools and Application, pp. 1–15. Springer, Berlin (2009)
4. Kontovas, C.A., Psaraftis, H.N.: Formal safety assessment: a critical review. Mar. Technol 46, 45–59 (2009)
5. Schröder-Hinrichs, J.-U.: Human and organizational factors in the maritime world—are we keeping up to speed? WMU J. Marittime Aff. 9(1), 1–3 (2010)
6. Schröder-Hinrichs, J.-U., Baldauf, M., Ghirxi, K.T.: Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 47(10), 1187–1196 (2011)
7. The Four Basic Principles of the FRAM. http://functionalresonance.com/basic-principles.html
8. Herrera, I.A., Woltjer, R.: Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95, 1269–1275 (2010)
9. Hollnagel, E.: FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method—Modelling Complex Socio-Technical Systems. Ashgate Publishing Company, Farnham (2012)
10. Hollnagel, E., Hounsgaard, J., Colligan, L.: FRAM—The Functional Resonance Analysis Method—A Handbook for the Practical Use of the Method. Centre for Quality, Middelfart (2014)
11. Woods, D.: Essential characteristics of resilience. In: Hollnagel, E., Woods, D., Leveson, N. (eds.) Resilience Engineering: Precepts and Concepts, pp. 21–34. Ashgate Publishing Group, Farnham (2006)
12. Schröder-Hinrichs, J.-U., Graziano, A., Kataria, A., Praetorius, G.: TRACEr-MAR— guidebook for the technique for the retrospective & predictive analysis of cognitive errors adapted to the MARitime domain. MaRiSa Occasional Paper no. 2. WMU (2016)
13. Kataria, A., Praetorius, G., Schröder-Hinrichs, J.U., Graziano, A., Teixeira, A.P., Soares, C.G., Golyshev, P., Kähler, N., Ventikos, N., Lykos, G.V., Sotiralis, P., Hüffmeier, J., Fälth, J., Ljungkvist, M.: Deliverable 1.1 results of accident and incident analysis (2014)
14. Kuniavsky, M.: Observing the User Experience. A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2003)
15. Bryman, A., Bell, E.: Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)
16. Psaraftis, H.N.: Formal safety assessment: an updated review. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 17, 390–402 (2012)