A new military ethos? NATO's response force

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 5-21

  Rynning, Sten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992621189     PISSN: 14794012     EISSN: 17541018     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14794010508656814     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. May 2004. NATO Briefing, NATO Response Force May, 1–1.
2. These are contained in MC 477. The homepage of the ARRC, one of NATO's rapid reaction corps, enumerates the missions. http://www.arrc.nato.int/brochure/q_a.htm.
3. Binnendijk, Hans, and Kugler, Richard. 2002. Transforming European Forces. Survival, 44 (3):123–123.
4. Binnendijk and Kugler. Transforming European Forces 123–123.
5. Binnendijk and Kugler. Transforming European Forces 127–127.
6. Joint Vision 2020 was published in June 2000, http://www.dtic.mil/jointvision/jvpub2.htm.
7. Binnedijk, Hans, and Kugler, Richard L., 2001. Adapting Forces to a New Era:Ten Transforming Concepts. Defense Horizons, November:3–3. and 5.
8. Rumsfeld's argument to the press at a press conference following the informal NATO defense ministers' meeting September 24, 2002, http://www.useu.be/Categories/Defense/Sept2402RumsfeldNATOProposal.html.
9. November 2002. “ The Washington Post ”. In NATO Looking Ahead to a Mission Makeover November, 5
10. Kagan, Robert. 2003. Paradise and Power, New York:Alfred A. Knopf. see also David P. Calleo, Rethinking Europe's Future, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2001.
11. Howorth, Jolyon. 2003. “ Why the ESDP is Necessary and Beneficial for the Alliance ”. In Defending Europe, Edited by:Howorth and Keeler. 233–233. New York:Palgrave. in
12. Rynning, Sten. October 2002. “ The Transatlantic Link and European Security:Defense Capabilities in Old or New Bottles? ”. In NATO Research Fellowship Report October, John Duffield, Power Rules:The Evolution of NATO's Conventional Force Posture, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1995.
13. Cited in The Independent on Sunday, Regiments face the axe in defence overhaul 2004 June 27
14. June 2004. Interviewed June, in
15. June 2004. Conducted by author at NATO headquarters in Brussels and at SHAPE June, in
16. June 2004. Interviewed by author at NATO headquarters in Brussels June, in
17. For Scheffer, see notably his June 2004 charge against the current disjointed force planning and force generation process:NATO's Istanbul Summit:new mission, new means the Royal United Services Institute London 2004 June speech at18www.nato.int/docu/speech/2004/s040618a.htm.
18. June 2004. Interviewed June
19. June 2004. Interviewed at NATO headquarters June
20. July 2004. “ Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Afghanistan ”. In NATO Mission Bears Signs Of Continuing U.S.-French Tensions July, Monday, 26
21. June 2004. Interviewed in Brussels June
22. The impact of this skepticism on the EU's bottom-up approach to force planning (since 1999) is analyzed in Rynning, Why Not NATO? Military Planning in the European Union Journal of Strategic Studies 2003 26 1 53 72 March
23. June 2004. Information conveyed in background interviews, NATO headquarters and SHAPE June