Artificial neural network genetic algorithm as powerful tool to predict and optimize in vitro proliferation mineral medium for G × N15 rootstock

Frontiers in Plant Science

Volumn 7, Issue OCTOBER2016, 2016, Pages

  Arab, Mohammad M ^a,b   Yadollahi, Abbas ^a   Shojaeiyan, Abdolali ^a   Ahmadi, Hamed ^a  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network (ANN); G N15 rootstock; Genetic algorithm (GA); Ion macronutrients; Proliferation; Prunus micropropagation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992485938     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1664462X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01526     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adelberg, J. W., Delgado, M. P., and Tomkins, J. T. (2010). Spent medium analysis for liquid culture micropropagation of Hemerocallison Murashige and Skoog medium. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 46, 95-107. doi: 10.1007/s11627-009-9247-1
2. Ahmadi, H., and Golian, A. (2010a). Growth analysis of chickens fed diets varying in the percentage of metabolizable energy provided by protein, fat, and carbohydrate through artificial neural network. Poult. Sci. 89, 173-179. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00125
3. Ahmadi, H., and Golian, A. (2010b). The integration of broiler chicken threonine responses data into neural network models. Poult. Sci. 89, 2535-2541. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00884
4. Ahmadi, H., and Golian, A. (2011). Response surface and neural network models for performance of broiler chicks fed diets varying in digestible protein and critical amino acids from 11 to 17 days of age. Poult. Sci. 90, 2085-2096. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01367
5. Andreu, P., and Marín, J. A. (2005). In vitro culture establishment and multiplication of the Prunus rootstock “Adesoto 101” (P. insititia L.) as affected by the type of propagation of the donorplant and by the culture medium composition. Sci. Hortic. 106, 258-267. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2005.03.008
6. Arab, M. M., Yadollahi, A., Hosseini-Mazinani, M., and Bagheri, S. (2014). Effects of antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles on in vitro establishment of G × N15 (hybrid of almond × peach) rootstock. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 12, 103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2014.10.002
7. Ashrafi, E. N., Vahdati, K., Ebrahimzadeh, H., and Mirmasoumi, M. (2010). Analysis of in-vitro explants mineral contents to modify medium mineral composition for enhancing growth of Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.). J. Food Agric. Environ. 8, 325-329.
8. Beckman, T. G., and Lang, G. A. (2002). Rootstock breeding of stone fruits. Acta Hortic. 622, 23-25. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.622.58
9. Bell, R. L., Srinivasan, C., and Lomberk, D. (2002). Effect of nutrient media on axillary shoot proliferation and preconditioning for adventitious shoot regeneration of pears. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 45, 708-714. doi: 10.1007/s11627-009-9196-8
10. Bosela, M. J., and Michler, C. (2008). Media effects on black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) shoot culture growth in vitro: evaluation of multiple nutrient formulations and cytokinin types. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 44, 316-329. doi: 10.1007/s11627-008-9114-5
11. Canli, F. A., and Tian, L. (2008). In vitro shoot regeneration from stored mature cotyledons regeneration. In Prunus regeneration studies, Thidiazuron and BA of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 116, 34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.10.023
12. Cheong, E. J. (2012). Biotechnological approaches for improvement and conservation of Prunus species. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 6, 17-28. doi: 10.1007/s11816-011-0195-y
13. Damiano, C., Monticelli, S., and Frattarelli, A. (2009). Recent progress and protocols in the micropropagation of apricot. Italus Hortus 16, 113-115.
14. Dayhoff, J. E., and DeLeo, J. M. (2001). Artificial neural networks: opening the black box. Cancer 91, 1615-1635.
15. Demuth, H., Beale, M., and Hagan, M. (2006). Neural Network Toolbox User's Guide. Version 5. Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc.
16. Desai, K. M., Survase, S. A., Saudagar, P. S., Lele, S. S., and Singhal, R. S. (2008). Comparison of artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) in fermentation media optimization: case study of fermentative production of scleroglucan. Biochem. Eng. J. 41, 266-273. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2008.05.009
17. Espinosa, A. C., Pijut, P. M., and Michler, C. H. (2006). Adventitious shoot regeneration and rooting of Prunus serotina in vitro cultures. HortScience 41, 193-201.
18. Felipe, A. J. (2009). ‘Felinem’, ‘Garnem’, and ‘Monegro’ Almond × Peach hybrid rootstocks. Hortscience 44, 196-197.
19. Fontes, M., Otoni, W., Carolino, S., Brommonschenkel, S., Fontes, E., Fari, M., et al. (1999). Hyperhydricity in pepper plants regenerated in vitro: involvement of BiP (binding protein) and ultrastructural aspects. Plant Cell Rep. 19, 81-87. doi: 10.1007/s002990050714
20. Gago, J., Landin, M., and Gallego, P. (2010a). A neurofuzzy logic approach for modeling plant processes: a practical case of in vitro direct rooting and acclimatization of Vitis vinifera. Plant Sci. 179, 241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.05.009
21. Gago, J., Martínez-Núñez, L., Landín, M., and Gallego, P. P. (2010b). Artificial neural networks as an alternative to the traditional statistical methodology in plant research. J. Plant Physiol. 167, 23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.07.007
22. Gago, J., Pérez-Tornero, O., Landin, M., Burgos, L., and Gallego, P. P. (2011). Improving knowledge of plant tissue culture and media formulation by neurofuzzy logic: a practical case of data mining using apricot databases. J. Plant Physiol. 168, 1858-1865. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.04.008
23. Gallego, P. P., Gago, J., and Landin, M. (2011). “‘Artificial neural networks technology to model and predict plant biology process,” in Artificial Neural Networks-Methodological and Biomedical Applications, ed K. Suzuki (Croatia: Intech Open Access Publisher), 197-216.
24. George, E. F., Hall, M. A., and De Klerk, G. J. (2008). “The components of plant tissue culture media I: macro-and micro-nutrients,” in Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture, 3rd Edn., eds E. F. George, M. A. Hall, and G. J. De Klerk (New York, NY: Springer), 65-113.
25. Greenway, M. B., Phillips, I. C., Lloyd, M. N., Hubstenberger, J. F., and Phillips, G. C. (2012). A nutrient medium for diverse applications and tissue growth of plant species in vitro. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 48, 403-410. doi: 10.1007/s11627-012-9452-1
26. Gulati, T., Chakrabarti, M., Singh, A., Duvuuri, M., and Banerjee, R. (2010). Comparative study of response surface methodology, artificial neural network and genetic algorithms for optimization of soybean hydration. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 48, 11-18.
27. Ivanova, M., and Van Staden, J. (2009). Nitrogen source, concentration, and NH4:NO3, ratio influence shoot regeneration and hyperhydricity in tissue cultured Aloe polyphylla. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 99, 167-174. doi: 10.1007/s11240-009-9589-8
28. Jamshidi, S., Yadollahi, A., Ahmadi, H., Arab, M. M., and Eftekhari, M. (2016). Predicting in vitro culture medium macro-nutrients composition for pear rootstocks using regression analysis and neural network models. Front. Plant Sci. 7:274. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00274
29. Jong, K. D. (2009). Evolutionary computation. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Comp. Stat. 1, 52-56.
30. Lloyd, G., and McCown, B. (1981). Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 30, 421-427.
31. Lou, W., and Nakai, S. (2001). Artificial neural network-based predictive model for bacterial growth in a simulated medium of modified-atmosphere-packed cooked meat products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49, 1799-1804. doi: 10.1021/jf000650m
32. Mansseri-Lamrioui, A., Louerguioui, A., and Abousalim, A. (2009). Effect of the medium culture on the microcutting of material resulting from adult cuttings of Wild cherry trees (Prunus avium L.) and of in vitro germination. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 25, 345-352.
33. Matlab. (2010). Matlab R. Version 7.1. Natick, MA: The Math Works Inc.
34. Mehrotra, S., Prakash, O., Khan, F., and Kukreja, A. K. (2013). Efficiency of neural network-based combinatorial model predicting optimal culture conditions for maximum biomass yield in hairy root cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 32, 309-317. doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1364-3
35. Mehrotra, S., Prakash, O., Mishra, B. N., and Dwevedi, B. (2008). Efficiency of neural networks for prediction of in vitro culture conditions and inoculum properties for optimum productivity. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1, 29-35. doi: 10.1007/s11240-008-9410-0
36. Moghri, M., Shamaee, H., Shahrajabian, H., and Ghannadzadeh, A. (2015). The effect of different parameters on mechanical properties of PA-6/clay nanocomposite through genetic algorithm and response surface methods. Int. Nano Lett. 5, 133-140. doi: 10.1007/s40089-015-0146-7
37. Murashige, T., and Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473-497. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
38. Nas, M. N., Bolek, Y., and Sevgin, N. (2013). Shortcut to long-distance developing of a tissue culture medium: micropropagation of mature almond cultivars as a case study. Turk. J. Bot. 37, 1134-1144. doi: 10.3906/bot-1302-49
39. Nas, M. N., and Read, P. E. (2004). A hypothesis for the development of a defined tissue culture medium of higher plants and micropropagation of hazelnuts. Sci. Hortic. 101, 189-200. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2003.10.004
40. Nezami Alanagh, E., Garoosi, G. A., Haddad, R., Maleki, S., Landín, M., and Gallego, P. P. (2014). Design of tissue culture media for efficient Prunus rootstock micropropagation using artificial intelligence models. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 117, 349-359. doi: 10.1007/s11240-014-0444-1
41. Niedz, R. P., and Evens, T. J. (2007). Regulating plant tissue growth by mineral nutrition. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 43, 370-381. doi: 10.1007/s11627-007-9062-5
42. Nowak, B., Miczyński, K., and Hudy, L. (2007). The effect of total inorganic nitrogen and the balance between its ionic forms on adventitious bud formation and callus growth of ‘Węgierka Zwykła’ plum. Acta Physiol. Plant. 29, 479-484. doi: 10.1007/s11738-007-0058-x
43. Pérez-Jiménez, M., Carrillo-Navarro, A., and Cos-Terrer, J. (2012). Regeneration of peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) cultivars and Prunus persica × Prunus dulcis rootstocks via organogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 108, 55-62. doi: 10.1007/s11240-011-0011-y
44. Pérez-Tornero, O., Egea, J., Vanoostende, A., and Burgos, L. (2000). Assessment of factors affecting adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro cultured leaves of apricot. Plant Sci. 158, 61-70. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00303-4
45. Petri, C., and Scorza, R. (2010). Factors affecting adventitious regeneration from in vitro leaf explants of “improved French” plum, the most important dried plum cultivar in the USA. Ann. Appl. Biol. 156, 79-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2009.00364.x
46. Poothong, S., and Reed, B. M. (2014). Modeling the effects of mineral nutrition for improving growth and development of micropropagated red raspberries. Sci. Hortic. 165, 132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.10.040
47. Prakash, O., Mehrotra, S., Krishna, A., and Mishra, B. N. (2010). A neural network approach for the prediction of in vitro culture parameters for maximum biomass yields in hairy root cultures. J. Theor. Biol. 265, 579-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.05.020
48. Prasad, V. S. S., and Dutta Gupta, S. (2006). “Applications and potentials of artificial neural networks in plant tissue culture,” in Plant Tissue Culture Engineering, eds S. Dutta Gupta, and Y. Ibaraki (Dordrecht: Springer), 47-66.
49. Quoirin, M., and Lepoivre, P. (1977). Etude de milieux adaptes aux cultures in vitro de prunus. Acta Hortic. 78, 437-442. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1977.78.54
50. Radmann, E. B., Bianch, V. J., Fachinello, J. C., and Oliveira, R. P. (2009). Influence of culture medium composition and explant type on micropropagation of the rootstock Prunus sp. “GxN-9”. Sci. Agraria 10, 95-101. doi: 10.5380/rsa.v10i2.13573
51. Ramage, C. M., and Williams, R. R. (2002). Mineral nutrition and plant morphogenesis. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 38, 116-124. doi: 10.1079/ivp2001269
52. Ruzic, D., and Vujovic, T. (2008). The effects of cytokinin types and their concentration on in vitro multiplication of sweet cherry cv. Lapins (Prunus avium L.). J Hortic. Sci. 35, 12-21.
53. Sedghi, M., Golian, A., Soleimani-Roodi, P., Ahmadi, A., Aami-Azghadi, M. (2012). Relationship between color and tannin content in sorghum grain: application of image analysis and artificial neural network. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 14, 57-62. doi: 10.1590/S1516-635X2012000100010
54. Shao, Q., Rowe, R. C., and York, P. (2006). Comparison of neurofuzzy logic and neural networks in modelling experimental data of an immediate release tablet formulation. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 28, 394-404. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2006.04.007
55. Shirdel, M., Motallebi-Azar, A., Masiha, S., Mortazavi, N., Matloobi, M., and Sharafi, Y. (2011). Effects of inorganic nitrogen source and NH4:NO3 ratio on proliferation of dog rose (Rosa canina). J. Med. Plants Res. 5, 4605-4609.
56. Shokri, S., Babaei, A., Ahmadian, M., Arab, M. M., and Hessami, S. (2013). “The effects of different concentrations of Nano-Silver on elimination of Bacterial contaminations and phenolic exudation of Rose (Rosa hybrida L.) in vitro culture,” in VIII International Symposium on In vitro Culture and Horticultural Breeding, Vol. 1083 (Portugal), 391-396.
57. Staikidou, I., Selby, C., and Hanks, G. R. (2006). Development of a medium for in vitro culture of Galanthusspecies based on the mineral composition of bulbs. J Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 81, 537-545. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2006.11512100
58. Unek, C., Tanriver, E., and Kude, A. B. (2010). “The effects of different cytokinins on micropropagation of ‘Garnem’ rootstock. Acta Horticulturae 923,” in International Symposium on Micro and Macro Technologies for Plant Propagation and Breeding in Horticulture. (Portugal).
59. Vujović, T., Ružić, D., and Cerović, R. (2012). In vitro shoot multiplication as influenced by repeated subculturing of shoots of contemporary fruit rootstocks. Hortscience 39, 101-107.
60. Wada, S., Niedz, R. P., DeNoma, J., and Reed, B. M. (2013). Mesos components (CaCl2, MgSO4, KH2PO4) are critical for improving pear micropropagation. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 49, 356-365. doi: 10.1007/s11627-013-9508-x
61. Yang, C., Gao, B., and Liu, J. (2012). Calcium ion and protocorm differentiation for cymbidium hybrid cymbidium lucky Gloria × Cymbidium Lovely Moon “Crescent.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 195, 475-479. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.195-196.475
62. Yu, Y., Zhao, Y.-Q., Zhao, B., Ren, S., and Guo, Y.-D. (2011). Influencing factors and structural characterization of hyperhydricity of in vitro regeneration in Brassica oleracea var. italica. J. Plant Sci. 91, 159-165.
63. Zhou, H., Li, M., Zhao, X., Fan, X., and Guo, A. (2010). Plant regeneration from in vitro leaves of the peach rootstock “Nemaguard” (Prunus persica × P. davidiana). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 101, 79-87. doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9666-z
64. Zielinska, A., and Kepczynska, E. (2013). Neural modeling of plant tissue cultures: a review. Biotechnologia 94, 253-268. doi: 10.5114/bta.2013.46419