Can a commercially available auditory training program improve audiovisual speech performance?

American Journal of Audiology

Volumn 25, Issue 3S, 2016, Pages 308-312

  Rishiq, Dania ^a   Rao, Aparna ^b   Koerner, Tess ^c   Abrams, Harvey ^d,e  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d Starkey Hearing Technologies   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; LIP READING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORRECTION OF HEARING IMPAIRMENT; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; LIPREADING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84992421008     PISSN: 10590889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/2016_AJA-16-0017     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abrams, H. B., Bock, K., & Irey, R. L. (2015). Can a remotely delivered auditory training program improve speech-in-noise understanding? American Journal of Audiology, 24, 333–337.
2. Bell, T. S., & Wilson, R. H. (2001). Sentence recognition materials based on frequency of word use and lexical confusability. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12, 514–522.
3. Bernstein, L. E., Auer, E. T., Jr., Eberhardt, S. P., & Jiang, J. (2013). Auditory perceptual learning for speech perception can be enhanced by audiovisual training. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 34.
4. Craig, W. N. (1964). Effects of preschool training on the development of reading and lipreading skills of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 109, 280–296.
5. Dey, A., & Sommers, M. S. (2015). Age-related differences in inhibitory control predict audiovisual speech perception. Psychology and Aging, 30, 634–646.
6. Eberhardt, S. P., Auer, E. T., & Bernstein, L. E. (2014). Multi-sensory training can promote or impede visual perceptual learning of speech stimuli: Visual-tactile vs. visual-auditory training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 829.
7. Erber, N. P. (1975). Auditory-visual perception of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40, 481–492.
8. Ferguson, M. A., & Henshaw, H. (2015). Auditory training can improve working memory, attention, and communication in adverse conditions for adults with hearing loss. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 556.
9. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
10. Grant, K. W., Walden, B. E., & Seitz, P. F. S. (1998). AV speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: Consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and AV integration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2677–2690.
11. Kawase, T., Sakamoto, S., Hori, Y., Maki, A., Suzuki, Y., & Kobayashi, T. (2009). Bimodal audio-visual training enhances auditory adaptation process. NeuroReport, 20, 1231–1234.
12. Kirk, K. I., Prusick, L. M., French, B. F., Eisenberg, L. S., Young, N. M., Gotch, C., Giuliani, N. (2012). Evaluating multimodal speech perception in adults with cochlear implants and hearing aids. Scientific session presented at the 12th Conference on Cochlear Implant and Other Implantable Auditory Technology, Baltimore, MD.
13. Levitt, H., Oden, C., Simon, H., Noack, C., & Lotze, A. (2011). Entertainment overcomes barriers of auditory training. The Hearing Journal, 64, 40–42.
14. Lidestam, B., Moradi, S., Pettersson, R., & Ricklefs, T. (2014). Audiovisual training is better than auditory-only training for auditory-only speech-in-noise identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136, 142–147.
15. McCullagh, J., & Shinn, J. B. (2013). Auditory cortical processing in noise in younger and older adults. Hearing, Balance and Communication, 11, 182–190.
16. McFadin, S., & Super Duper Publications. (2006). ADLR: The Auditory Discrimination and Lip Reading Skills Inventory. Greenville, SC: Super Duper Publications.
17. Montgomery, A., Walden, B., Schwartz, D., & Prosek, R. (1984). Training auditory-visual speech reception in adults with senso-rineural hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 5, 30–36.
18. Moradi, S., Lidestam, B., & Ronnberg, J. (2013). Gated audiovisual speech identification in silence vs. noise: Effects on time and accuracy. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 359.
19. Nilsson, M., Soli, S., & Sullivan, J. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1085–1099.
20. Olson, A. D., Preminger, J. E., & Shinn, J. B. (2013). The effect of LACE DVD training in new and experienced hearing aid users. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24, 214–230.
21. Rao, A., Rishiq, D., Yu, L., Zhang, Y., & Abrams, H. (2016). Auditory event-related potential outcomes with hearing aid use followed by ReadMyQuips auditory training program. Ear and Hearing. Advance online publication. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000348
22. Richie, C., & Kewley-Port, D. (2008). The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1607–1619.
23. Ross, L. A., Saint-Amour, D., Leavitt, V. N., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2007). Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1147–1153.
24. Schroeder, C. E., Lakatos, P., Kajikawa, Y., Partan, S., & Puce, A. (2008). Neuronal oscillations and visual amplification of speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 106–113.
25. Schwartz, J. L. (2010). A reanalysis of McGurk data suggests that audiovisual fusion in speech perception is subject-dependent. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 1584–1594.
26. Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212–215.
27. Utley, J. (1946). A test of lip reading ability. Journal of Speech Disorders, 11, 109–116.
28. Walden, B. E., Erdman, S. E., Montgomery, A. A., Schwam, D. M., & Rosek, R. A. (1981). Some effects of training on speech recognition by hearing impaired adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, 207–216.
29. Zilber, N., Ciuciu, P., Gramfort, A., Azizi, L., & van Wassenhove, V. (2014). Supramodal processing optimizes visual perceptual learning and plasticity. NeuroImage, 93, 32–46.