Fabrication and characterization of integrally skinned-oriented highly selective charged asymmetric low pressure poly(ether sulfone) membranes for nanofiltration

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 559-569

  Hassan, Abdul Rahman ^a   Abdul Munaim, Mimi Sakinah ^b  

^a TATI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA PAHANG   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Highly selective; Nanofiltration; Poly(ether sulfone); Shear rates; Skinned oriented

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC MEMBRANES; HIGHLY SELECTIVE; LOW PRESSURES; MEMBRANE CHARACTERISTICS; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; MODELING RESULTS; NF MEMBRANES; PERFORMANCE PROPERTIES; POLY(ETHER SULFONE); POLYETHERSULFONE MEMBRANE; PORE DISTRIBUTION; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; SKINNED-ORIENTED; STRUCTURAL DETAILS;

ETHERS; FABRICATION; MOLECULAR ORIENTATION; MORPHOLOGY; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; OCEAN STRUCTURES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; POLYACRYLONITRILES; PORE SIZE;

SHEAR DEFORMATION;

POLYETHERSULFONE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; ASYMMETRIC MEMBRANE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; MATERIALS TESTING; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; NANOFABRICATION; NANOFILTRATION; POROSITY; PRESSURE; SHEAR RATE; SPIEGLER KEDEM MODEL; STEREOSPECIFICITY; TEORELL MEYERS SIEVERS MODEL;

EID: 84858295845     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2751     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Qin JJ, Wang R and Chung TS, Investigation of shear stress effect within a spinneret on flux, separation and thermomechanical properties of hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 175: 197-213 (2000).
2. Chung TS, Lin WH and Vora VH, The effects of shear rate on the gas separation performance of 6FDA-durene polyimide hollow fibers. J Membr Sci 167: 55-66 (2000).
3. Idris A and Ismail AF, Study of shear rate influence on the performance of cellulose acetate reverse osmosis hollow fiber membrane. J Membr Sci 202: 205-215 (2002).
4. Ismail AF and Shilton SJ, Polysulfone gas separation membrane with enhanced selectivity. J Membr Sci 139: 285-296 (1998).
5. Idris A, Ismail AF, Norhayati M and Shilton SJ, Measurement of rheological induced molecular orientation using attenuated total reflection infrared dichroism in reverse osmosis hollow fiber cellulose acetate membrane and influence on separation Performance. J Membr Sci 213: 45-54 (2002).
6. Ismail AF and Yean LP, Effect of shear rate on morphology and gas separation performance as asymmetric polysulfone membranes. ASEAN J Chem Eng 2: 67-74 (2002).
7. Ismail AF, Shilton SJ, Dunkin IR and Gallivan SL, Direct measurement of rheological induced molecular orientation in gas separation hollow fiber membranes and effects on selectivity. J Membr Sci 126: 133-137 (2002).
8. Vrijenhoek EM and Waypa JJ, Arsenic removal from drinking water by a 'loose' nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 130: 265-277 (2000).
9. Bowen WR, Mohammad AW and Hilal N, Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J Membr Sci 126: 91-105 (1997).
10. Nako SI and Kimura S, Model of membrane transport phenomena and their applications for ultrafiltration data. J Chem Eng Japan 15: 200 (1982).
11. Schirg P and Widmer F, Characterization of nanofiltration membranes for the separation of aqueous dye-salt solution. Desalination 89: 89 (1992).
12. Vrijenhoek EM and Waypa JJ, Arsenic removal from drinking water by a 'loose' nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 130: 265-277 (2000).
13. Bowen WR and Welfoot JS, Modelling of membrane nanofiltration-pore size distribution effects. Chem Eng Sci 57: 1393-1407 (2002).
14. Bowen WR and Mukhtar H, Characterization and prediction of separation of nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 112: 263-274 (1996).
15. Ismail AF and Hassan AR, The deduction of fine structural details of asymmetric nanofiltration membranes using theoretical models. J Membr Sci 231: 25-36 (2004).
16. Ismail AF, Hassan AR and Cheer NB, Effect of shear on the performance of nanofiltration membrane for water desalination. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 24:(Suppl.): 879-889 (2002).
17. Ismail AF and Hassan AR, Formation and characterization of asymmetric nanofiltration membrane: effect of shear rate and polymer concentration. J Membr Sci 270: 57-72 (2006).
18. Ismail AF and Hassan AR, Effect of additive contents on the performances and structural properties of asymmetric polyethersulfone (PES) nanofiltration membranes. Sep Pur Technol 55: 98-109 (2007).
19. Chuang WY, Young TH, Chiu WY and Lin CY, The effect of polymeric additives on the structure and permeability of poly(vinyl alcohol) asymmetric membrane. Polymer 41: 4633-5641 (2000).
20. Deen WM, Bohrer MP and Brenner BM, Macromolecules transport across glomerular capillaries: Application of pore model. Kidney Int 16: 353 (1979).
21. Wang D, Li K and Teo WK, Relationship between mass ratio of nonsolvent additives to solvent in membrane casting solution and its coagulation value. J Membr Sci 98: 233-240 (1995).
22. Wang XL, Tsuru T, Nakao SI and Kimura S, The electrostatic and steric-hindrance model for the transport of charged solutes through nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 135: 19-32 (1997).
23. Aimar P, Meireles M and Sanchez V, A contribution to the translation of retention curves into pore size distribution for sieving membranes. J Membr Sci 54: 321-338 (1990).
24. Michaels AS, Analysis and prediction of sieving curves for ultrafiltration membranes: a universal correlation. Sep Sci Technol 15: 1305 (1980).
25. van de Witte P, Dijkstra PJ, van den Berg JWA and Feijen BJ, Phase separation processes in polymer solutions in relation to membrane formation. J Membr Sci 117: 1 (1996).
26. Wang KY and Chung TS, The characterization of flat composite nanofiltration membranes and their applications in the separation of Cephalexin. J Membr Sci 247: 37-50 (2005).
27. Kesting RE, Synthetic Polymeric Membranes. Wiley, New York (1985).
28. Lau WJ and Ismail AF, Theoretical studies on the morphological and electrical properties of blended PES/SPEEK nanofiltration membranes using different suflfonation degree of SPEEK. J Membr Sci 334: 30-42 (2009).
29. Singh S, Khulbe KC, Matsuura T and Ramamurthy P, Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy. J Membr Sci 142: 111-127 (1998).
30. Khayet M and Matsuura T, Determination of surface and bulk pore sizes of flat-sheet and hollow fiber membranes by atomic force microscopy, gas permeation and solute transport methods. Desalination 158: 57-64 (2003).
31. Szymczyk A, Labbez C, Fievet P, Vidonne A, Foissy A and Pagetti J, Contribution of convection, diffusion and migration to electrolytes transport through nanofiltration membranes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 103: 77-94 (2003).
32. Ahmad AL, Ooi BS, Mohammad AW and Choudhry JP, Development of highly hydrophilic nanofiltration membrane for desalination and water treatment. Desalination 168: 215-221 (2004).
33. Bruggen BV and Vandecasteele C, Modelling of the retention of uncharged molecules with nanofiltration. Water Res 36: 1360-1368 (2002).
34. Sharpe ID, Ismail AF and Shilton SJ, A study of extrusion shear and forced convection residence time in the spinning of polysulfone hollow fiber membranes for gas separation. Sep Purif Technol 17: 101-109 (1999).
35. Qin JJ and Chung TS, Effect of dope flow on the morphology, separation performances, thermal and mechanical properties of ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes. J Membr Sci 157: 35-51 (1999).