Multitarget error estimation and adaptivity in aerodynamic flow simulations

SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 708-731

  Hartmann, Ralf ^a,b  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptivity; Compressible Navier Stokes equations; Discontinuous Galerkin discretization; Error estimation; Multiple target functionals

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC DRAG; AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; ERROR ANALYSIS; GALERKIN METHODS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VISCOUS FLOW;

ACCURATE COMPUTATIONS; ADAPTIVITY; COMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS; DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN; DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN DISCRETIZATION; GALERKIN DISCRETIZATION; GOAL-ORIENTED; MULTIPLE TARGET FUNCTIONALS; MULTIPLE TARGETS; TARGET FUNCTIONALS;

FLOW SIMULATION;

EID: 84992361874     PISSN: 10648275     EISSN: 10957197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/070710962     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adigma, Adaptive Higher-Order Variational Methods for Aerodynamic Applications in Industry. A Specific Targeted Research Project of the Sixth European Community Framework Programme, http://www.dlr.de/as/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-2035.
2. D. N. Arnold, F. Brezzi, B. Cockburn, and L. D. Marini, Unified analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 39 (2002), pp. 1749-1779.
3. W. Bangerth, R. Hartmann, and G. Kanschat, deal.II-a general-purpose object-oriented finite element library, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 33 (2007), article 24.
4. W. Bangerth, R. Hartmann, and G. Kanschat, deal.II Differential Equations Analysis Library, Technical Reference, http://www.dealii.org/, 6.0 edition, 2007.
5. T. Barth and M. Larson, A posteriori error estimates for higher order Godunov finite volume methods on unstructured meshes, in Finite Volumes for Complex Applications III, R. Herbin and D. Kröner, eds., Hermes Science Publishing, Paris, 2002, pp. 41-63.
6. R. Becker and R. Rannacher, A feed-back approach to error control in finite element methods: Basic analysis and examples, East-West J. Numer. Math., 4 (1996), pp. 237-264.
7. R. Becker and R. Rannacher, An optimal control approach to a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods, Acta Numer., 10 (2001), pp. 1-102.
8. M. Giles and E. Süli, Adjoint methods for PDEs: A posteriori error analysis and postprocessing by duality, Acta Numer., 11 (2002), pp. 145-236.
9. K. Harriman, D. Gavaghan, and E. Süli, The Importance of Adjoint Consistency in the Approximation of Linear Functionals Using the Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method, Technical report NA-04/18, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Oxford, UK, 2004.
10. R. Hartmann, Adaptive Finite Element Methods for the Compressible Euler Equations, Ph.D. thesis, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, 2002.
11. R. Hartmann, Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin methods with shock-capturing for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 51 (2006), pp. 1131-1156.
12. R. Hartmann, Adjoint consistency analysis of discontinuous Galerkin discretizations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 45 (2007), pp. 2671-2696.
13. R. Hartmann, J. Held, T. Leicht, and F. Prill, PADGE, Parallel Adaptive Discontinuous Galerkin Environment, Technical Reference, DLR, Braunschweig, Germany, in preparation.
14. R. Hartmann and P. Houston, Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24 (2002), pp. 979-1004.
15. R. Hartmann and P. Houston, Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for the compressible Euler equations, J. Comput. Phys., 183 (2002), pp. 508-532.
16. R. Hartmann and P. Houston, Goal-oriented a posteriori error estimation for multiple target functionals, in Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications, T. Y. Hou and E. Tadmor, eds., Springer, Berlin, 2003, pp. 579-588.
17. R. Hartmann and P. Houston, Symmetric interior penalty DG methods for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations I: Method formulation, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model., 3 (2006), pp. 1-20.
18. R. Hartmann and P. Houston, Symmetric interior penalty DG methods for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations II: Goal-oriented a posteriori error estimation, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model., 3 (2006), pp. 141-162.
19. R. Hartmann and P. Houston, An optimal order interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin discretization of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, J. Comput. Phys., to appear.
20. P. Houston, R. Rannacher, and E. Süli, A posteriori error analysis for stabilised finite element approximations of transport problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 190 (2000), pp. 1483-1508.
21. P. Houston and E. Süli, hp-adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for firstorder hyperbolic problems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 23 (2001), pp. 1226-1252.
22. P. Houston and E. Süli, Stabilized hp-finite element approximation of partial differential equations with nonnegative characteristic form, Computing, 66 (2001), pp. 99-119.
23. J. Lu, An A Posteriori Error Control Framework for Adaptive Precision Optimization Using Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2005.
24. D. A. Venditti and D. L. Darmofal, Anisotropic grid adaptation for functional outputs: Application to two-dimensional viscous flows, J. Comput. Phys., 187 (2003), pp. 22-46.