An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 95-122

  Khan, Faisal I ^a   Husain, Tahir ^a   Hejazi, Ramzi ^a,b  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^b SAUDI ARAMCO   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Groundwater cleanup; Natural attenuation; Site remediation; Soil remediation; Soil vapor extraction

Indexed keywords

GROUNDWATER; REMEDIATION; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL POLLUTION;

APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES; CLEANUP PROGRAM; CONTAMINATED SITES; GROUNDWATER CLEAN-UP; REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES; RESTORATION TECHNIQUES; SITE REMEDIATION; SITE RESTORATION; SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION; SOILS REMEDIATION;

SITE SELECTION;

GROUND WATER;

CLEANUP; CONTAMINATED LAND; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SOIL REMEDIATION; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

AGRICULTURE; AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREACTOR; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EXTRACTION; PHYTOREMEDIATION; POLLUTION CONTROL; REVIEW; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL TREATMENT; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WATER POLLUTION; WATER TREATMENT;

PANACEA;

EID: 2542501775     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (145)

1. Abbott, E.H., Bell, J.T., Fjeld, R.A., Peterson, J.R., Sivavec, T.M., 2002. In situ Treatment of Mercury Contaminated Soils, Center for Research and Technology Development, (Publication) CRTD, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 64., pp. 769-773.
2. Acar, Y.B., Alshawabkeh, A., 1993. Principle of electrokinetic remediation. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 27(13), 2638-2647.
3. Adams, J.A., Reddy, K.R., 2003. Extent of benzene biodegradation in saturated soil column during air sparging. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 23(3), 85-94.
4. Alexander, M., 1994. Biodegradation and Bioremediation, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
5. Alkorta, I., Garbisu, C., 2001. Phytoremediation of organic contaminants in soils. Bioresource Technology 79(3), 273-276.
6. Alpaslan, B., Yukselen, M.A., 2002. Remediation of lead contaminated soils by stabilization/solidification. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 133(1-4), 253-263.
7. Alter, S.R., Brusseau, M.L., Piatt, J.J., Ray-M, A., Wang, J.-M., Cain, R.B., 2003. Use of tracer tests to evaluate the impact of enhanced-solubilization flushing on in-situ biodegradation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 64(3-4), 191-202.
8. Anderson, W.C., 1995. Innovative Site Remediation Technologies, vol. 1-8. American Academy of Environmental Engineers, Annapolis, ML.
9. Anderson, A., Mitchell, P., 2003. Treatment of mercury-contaminated soil, mine waste and sludge using silica micro-encapsulation. TMS Annual Meeting, Extraction and Processing Division, Mar 2-6 2003, San Diego, CA, pp. 265-274.
10. API, 1993. Guide for Assessing and Remediating Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soils, American Petroleum Institute, API publication number 1629, Washington, DC.
11. Asante-Duah, D.K., 1996. Managing Contaminated Sites: Problem Diagnosis and Development of Site Restoration, Wiley, New York, NY.
12. Baciocchi, R., Boni, M.R., D'Aprile, L., 2003. Characterization and performance of granular iron as reactive media for TCE degradation by permeable reactive barriers. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 149(1-4), 211-226.
13. Baker, R.S., Moore, A.T., 2000. Optimizing the effectiveness of in situ bioventing. Pollution Engineering 32(7), 44-47.
14. Barnes, D.L., 2003. Estimation of operation time for soil vapor extraction systems. Journal of Environmental Engineering 129(9), 873-878.
15. Barnes, D.L., Cosden, E., Johnson, B., Johnson, K., Stjarnstrom, S., Johansson, K., Filler, D., 2002. Operation of Soil Vapor Extraction in Cold Climates, Cold Regions Engineering Cold Regions Impacts on Transportation and Infrastructure, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference, May 20-22 2002, Anchorage, AK, pp. 956-967.
16. Barter, M.A., 1999. Phytoremediation - an overview. Journal of New England Water Environment Association 33(2), 158-164.
17. Bass, D.H., Hastings, N.A., Brown, R.A., 2000. Performance of air sparging systems: a review of case studies. Journal of Hazardous Materials 72, 101-119.
18. Bayer, P., Finkel, M., Teutsch, G., 2002. Reliability of Hydraulic Performance and Cost Estimates of Barrier-Supported Pump-and-Treat Systems in Heterogeneous Aquifers, IAHS-AISH Publication, vol. 277., pp. 331-338.
19. Bear, J., Sun, Y., 1998. Optimization of pump-treat-injection (PTI) design for the remediation of a contaminated aquifer: multi-stage design with chance constraints. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 29, 225-244.
20. Benner, M.L., Mohtar, R.H., Lee, L.S., 2002. Factors affecting air sparging remediation systems using field data and numerical simulations. Journal of Hazardous Materials 95(3), 305-329.
21. Biorem, 1998. Air Sparging Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils, Biorem Technologies Inc, Waterloo, ON, http://www.bioremtechnologies.com/assets/field_study_air_sparging.html.
22. Birke, V., Burmeier, H., Rosenau, D., 2003. Design, construction, and operation of tailored permeable reactive barrier. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 7(4), 264-280.
23. Boulding, J.R., 1996. USEPA Environmental Engineering Sourcebook, Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI.
24. Boyle, W.C., 2002. A Brief History of Aeration of Wastewater, Proceedings of the Environmental and Water Resources History, Nov 3-7 2002, Washington, DC, pp. 13-21.
25. 2+ and UVA light. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 46(2), 381-391.
26. Brown, R., Leahy, M.C., Molnaa, B., 1999. Bioremediation-a powerful and resilient companion technology. Pollution Engineering 31(10), 26-29.
27. Canter, L.W., Knox, R.C., 1985. Groundwater Pollution Control, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.
28. Chaineau, C.H., Yepremian, C., Vidalie, J.F., Ducreux, J., Ballerini, D., 2003. Bioremediation of a crude oil-polluted soil: biodegradation, leaching and toxicity assessments. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 144(1-4), 419-440.
29. Chareneau, R.J., Bedient, P.B., Loehr, R.C., 1995. Groundwater Remediation, vol. 8. Technomic Publication Company, Lancaster, PA.
30. Chu, W., 2003. Remediation of contaminated soils by surfactant-aided soil washing. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 7(1), 19-24.
31. Chu, W., Chan, K.H., 2003. The mechanism of the surfactant-aided soil washing system for hydrophobic and partial hydrophobic organics. Science of the Total Environment 307(1-3), 83-92.
32. CPEO, 1997. Soil washing. Center for Public Environmental Oversight. 425 Market Street, San Francisco, CA, http://thecity.sfsu/~cpeo/techtree/ttdescript/soilwash.html
33. CPEO, 1998a. Bioslurping. Center for Public Environmental Oversight. 425 Market Street, San Francisco, CA, http://thecity.www.sfsu.edu/~cpeo/techtree/ttdescript/bislurp.html
34. CPEO, 1998b. Solidification/stabilization. Center for Public Environmental Oversight. 425 Market Street, San Francisco, CA, http://www.cpeo.org/techtree/ttdescript/solidsta.htm
35. CPEO, 1998c. Pump and treat technology. Center for Public Environmental Oversight. 425 Market Street, San Francisco, CA, http://www.cpeo.org/techtree/ttdescript/pumptre.htm
36. CPEO, 1998d. Soil flushing. Center for Public Environmental Oversight. 425 Market Street, San Francisco, CA, http://www.cpeo.org/techtree/ttdescript/soilflus.htm
37. CPEO, 1998e. Thermal desorption. Center for Public Environmental Oversight. 425 Market Street, San Francisco, CA, http://www.cpeo.org/techtree/ttdescript/thedesop.htm
38. Cresap, G.H., 1999. Case study: application of short-duration, periodic bioslurping at a petroleum hydrocarbon release site, Hazardous and Industrial Wastes. Proceedings of the Mid-Atlantic Industrial Waste Conference, pp. 159-168.
39. Demars, K.R., Richardson, G.N., Yond, R.N., Chaney R.C., 1995. Dredging, remediation, and containment of contaminated sediments. ASTM Publication No. STP 1293, American Society of Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
40. DENIX, 1995. Natural attenuation for petroleum-contaminated sites at federal facilities. Defense Environmental Network and Information exchange, http://www.denix.osd.mil/denix/Public/Library/ Attenuation/attenuation.html
41. Dermatas, D., Meng, X., 2003. Utilization of fly ash for stabilization/solidification of heavy metal contaminated soils. Engineering Geology 70(3-4), 377-394.
42. Di Palma, L., Ferrantelli, P., Merli, C., Biancifiori, F., 2003. Recovery of EDTA and metal precipitation from soil flushing solutions. Journal of Hazardous Materials 103(1-2), 153-168.
43. Diele, F., Notarnicola, F., Sgura, I., 2002. Uniform air velocity field for a bioventing system design: some numerical results. International Journal of Engineering Science 40(11), 1199-1210.
44. Druss, D.L., 2003. Guidelines for Design and Installation of Soil-Cement Stabilization, Geotechnical Special Publication, Feb 10-12 2003, New Orleans, LA, Number 120, pp. 527-539.
45. Erickson, L.E., Banks, M.K., Davis, L.C., Schwab, A.P., Muralidharan, N., Reilley, K., Tracy, J.C., 1999. Using Vegetation to Enhance In Situ Bioremediation, Center for Hazardous Substances Research, Kansas University, Manhattan, KA.
46. Feng, D., Lorenzen, L., Aldrich, C., Mare, P.W., 2001. Ex-situ diesel contaminated soil washing with mechanical methods. Minerals Engineering 14(9), 1093-1100.
47. Filler, D.M., Lindstrom, J.E., Braddock, J.F., Johnson, R.A., Nickalaski, R., 2001. Integral biopile components for successful bioremediation in the Arctic. Cold Regions Science and Technology 32(2-3), 143-156.
48. Fonade, C., Rols, J.L., Goma, G., Doubrovine, N., Bermejo, M., Grasa, J.P., 2000. Improvement of industrial wastewater treatment by aerated lagoon: case studies. Water Science and Technology 42(5), 193-200.
49. FRTR, 1999a. Soil washing. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W. Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_21.html
50. FRTR, 1999b. Landfarming. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_15.html
51. FRTR, 1999c. Passive/reactive treatment walls. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_46.html
52. FRTR, 1999d. Bioslurping. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_39.html
53. FRTR, 1999e. In situ solidification/stabilization. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_10.html
54. FRTR, 1999f. In and ex situ solidification/stabilization. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_24.html
55. FRTR, 1999g. Ground water pumping. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_58.html
56. FRTR, 1999h. Soil flushing. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_8.html
57. FRTR, 1999i. UV oxidation. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_56.html
58. FRTR, 1999j. Thermal desorption. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_29.html
59. FRTR, 1999k. Bioventing. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_1.html
60. FRTR, 1999l. Biopiles. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_12.html
61. FRTR, 1999m. Phytoremediation. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_5.html
62. FRTR, 1999n. Aeration. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_37.html
63. FRTR, 1999o. Slurry phase biological treatment. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_16.html
64. FRTR, 1999p. In-well air stripping. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_45.html
65. FRTR, 1999q. Incineration. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. USEPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC, http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/4_26.html
66. Guerin, T.F., Horner, S., McGovern, T., Davey, B., 2002. An application of permeable reactive barrier technology to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater. Water Research 36(1), 15-24.
67. GWRTAC, 1996a. Technical documents-technical overview reports. Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center. 425 Sixth Avenue, Regional Enterprise Tower, Pittsburgh, PA, http://gwrtac.org/html/tech_over.html
68. GWRTAC, 1996b. Bioslurping. Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center. Publication # GWRTAC-TO-96-05. 425 Sixth Avenue, Regional Enterprise Tower, Pittsburgh, PA.
69. GWRTAC, 1996c. Ultraviolet/Oxidation treatment. Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center. Publication # GWRTAC-TO-96-06. 425 Sixth Avenue, Regional Enterprise Tower, Pittsburgh, PA.
70. GWRTAC, 1996d. Phytoremediation. Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center. Publication # GWRTAC-TO-96-03. 425 Sixth Avenue, Regional Enterprise Tower, Pittsburgh, PA.
71. GWRTAC, 1996e. Horizontal wells. Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center. 425 Sixth Avenue, Regional Enterprise Tower, Pittsburgh, PA, http://gwrtac.org/html/tech_over.html
72. Halmemies, S., Grondahl, S., Arffman, M., Nenonen, K., Tuhkanen, T., 2003. Vacuum extraction based response equipment for recovery of fresh fuel spins from soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 97(1-4), 127-143.
73. Harmsen, J., 1991. Possibilities and limitations of landfarming for cleaning contaminated sites. In: Hinchee, R.E., Olfenbuttel, R.F. (Eds.), On-Site Bioreclamation: Processes for Xenobiotic and Hydrocarbon Treatment, Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
74. Harper, B.M., Stiver, W.H., Zytner, R.G., 2003. Non-equilibrium nonaqueous phase liquid mass transfer model for soil vapor extraction systems. Journal of Environmental Engineering 129(8), 745-754.
75. Hejazi, R., Husain, T., Khan, F.I., 2003. Landfarming operation in arid region-human health risk assessment. Journal of Hazardous Materials B99, 287-302.
76. Hejazi, R.F., 2002. Oily Sludge Degradation Study Under Arid Conditions Using a Combination of Landfarm and Bioreactor Technologies. PhD thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada.
77. Illangasekare, T.H., Reible, D.D., 2001. Pump-and-Treat for Remediation and Plume Containment: Applications, Limitations, and Relevant Processes, Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 100., pp. 79-119.
78. Johnston, C.D., Fisher, S., Rayner, J.L., 2002. Removal of Petroleum Hydrocarbons from the Vadose Zone During Multi-Phase Extraction at a Contaminated Industrial Site, IAHS-AISH Publication, number 275.
79. Jorgensen, K.S., Puustinen, J., Suortti, A.M., 2000. Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by composting in biopiles. Environmental Pollution 107(2), 245-254.
80. Juhasz, A.L., Smith, E., Smith, J., Naidu, R., 2003b. In situ remediation of DDT-contaminated soil using a two-phase co-solvent flushing-fungal biosorption process. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 147(1-4), 263-274.
81. Kao, C.M., Chen, S.C., Liu, J.K., Wu, M.J., 2001. Evaluation of TCDD biodegradability under different redox conditions. Chemosphere 44(6), 1447-1454.
82. Khan, F.I., Husain, T., 2002. Evaluation of Contaminated Sites Using Risk Based Monitored Natural Attenuation, Chemical Engineering Progress-AIChE, USA, January 34-44.
83. Khan, F.I., Husain, T., 2003. Evaluation of a petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated site for natural attenuation using 'RBMNA' methodology. Environmental Modeling and Software 18, 179-194.
84. Kirtland, B.C., Aelion, C.M., 2000. Petroleum mass removal from low permeability sediment using air sparging/soil vapor extraction: impact of continuous or pulsed operation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 41, 367-383.
85. Kuyukina, M.S., Ivshina, I.B., Ritchkova, M.I., Philp, J.C., Cunningham, C.J., Christofi, N., 2003. Bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil using slurry-phase biological treatment and land farming techniques. Soil and Sediment Contamination 12(1), 85-99.
86. Li, P., Sun, T., Stagnitti, F., Zhang, C., Zhang, H., Xiong, X., Allinson, G., Ma, X., Allinson, M., 2002. Field-scale bioremediation of soil contaminated with crude oil. Environmental Engineering Science 19(5), 277-289.
87. Liang, S., Min, J.H., Davis, M.K., Green, J.F., Renter, D.S., 2003. Use of pulsed-UV processes to destroy NDMA. American Water Works Association 95(9), 121-131.
88. Lin, H.K., Man, X.D., Walsh, D.E., 2001. Lead removal via soil washing and leaching. JOM 53(12), 22-25.
89. Logsdon, S.D., Keller, K.E., Moorman, T.B., 2002. Measured and predicted solute leaching from multiple undisturbed soil columns. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66(3), 686-695.
90. Mackay, D.M., Cherry, J.A., 1989. Groundwater contamination: pump-and-treat remediation. Environmental Science and Technology 23, 630-636.
91. Midwest Research Institute, 1998. Petroleum hydrocarbon remediation. 425 Volker Boulevard, Kansas City, MI, http://www.mriresearch.org/ae/phc-tech.html
92. Mihopoulos, P.G., Suidan, M.T., Sayles, G.D., 2001. Complete remediation of PCE contaminated unsaturated soils by sequential anaerobic-aerobic bioventing. Water Science and Technology 43(5), 365-372.
93. Mihopoulos, P.G., Suidan, M.T., Sayles, G.D., Kaskassian, S., 2002. Numerical modeling of oxygen exclusion experiments of anaerobic bioventing. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 58(3-4), 209-220.
94. Mitchell, P., Potter, C., 1999. The Future of Waste Treatment in the Mining Industry, Proceedings of Global Symposium on Recycling, Waste Treatment and Clean Technology, Sep 5-91999, San Sebastian, Spain.
95. Moyers, J.R., Nichols, J.D., Whitlock, I., 1997. Disadvantages of Pump-and-Treat Remediation, Groundwater Pollution Primer, Virginia Tech University.
96. Muehlberger, E.W., Harris, K., Hicks, P., 1997. In Situ Biosparging of a Large Scale Dissolved Petroleum Hydrocarbon Plume at a Southwest Lumber mill, TAPPI Proceedings - Environmental Conference and Exhibition, vol. 1.
97. Nakhla, G., Lugowski, A., 2003. Control of filamentous organisms in food-processing wastewater treatment by intermittent aeration and selectors. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 78(4), 420-430.
98. National Research Council, 1994. Alternatives for Groundwater Cleanup, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
99. Nedunuri, K.V., Govindaraju, R.S., Banks, M.K., Schwab, A.P., Chen, Z., 2000. Evaluation of phytoremediation for field-scale degradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons. Journal of Environmental Engineering 126(6), 483-490.
100. NRMRL, 1995. Superfund innovative technology evaluation program, technology profiles, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH.
101. Nyer, E.K., 1996. In situ Treatment Technology, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
102. Otterpohl, R., 2002. Options for alternative types of sewerage and treatment systems directed to improvement of the overall performance. Water Science and Technology 45(3), 149-158.
103. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. 1994. Groundwater pump-and-treat, http://www.pnl.gov/WEBTECH/nonvoc/pmptreat.html
104. Park, J., Jung, Y., Han, M., Lee, S., 2002. Simultaneous removal of cadmium and turbidity in contaminated soil-washing water by DAF and electroflotation. Water Science and Technology 46(11-12), 225-230.
105. Pulford, I.D., Watson, C., 2003. Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land by trees - a review. Environment International 29(4), 529-540.
106. RAAG, 2000. Evaluation of Risk Based Corrective Action Model, Remediation Alternative Assessment Group, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NF, Canada.
107. Rai, J.P.N., Singhal, V., 2003. Biogas production from water hyacinth and channel grass used for phytoremediation of industrial effluents. Bioresource Technology 86(3), 221-225.
108. Reddy, K.R., Saichek, R.E., 2003. Effect of soil type on electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene using surfactants and co-solvents. Journal of Environmental Engineering 129(4), 336-346.
109. Reddy, K.R., Admas, J.F., Richardson, C., 1999. Potential technologies for remediation of Brownfield. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 3(2), 61-68.
110. Riser-Roberts, E., 1992. Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Sites, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
111. Riser-Roberts, E., 1998. Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soil: Biological, Physical, and Chemical Processes, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
112. Robertson, D., Burnley, S., Barratt, R., 2003. The Immobilization of Flue Gas Treatment Residues through the Use of a Single Staged Wash and Crystalline Matrix Encapsulation (CME) treatment process, Proceedings of the 11th Annual North American Waste to Energy Conferences (NAWTEC11), Apr 28-30 2003, Tampa, FL, pp. 135-143.
113. Sherwood, L.J., Qualls, R.G., 2001. Stability of phosphorus within a wetland soil following ferric chloride treatment to control eutrophication. Environmental Science and Technology 35(20), 4126-4131.
114. Son, A.J., Shin, K.H., Lee, J.U., Kim, K.W., 2003. Chemical and ecotoxicity assessment of PAH-contaminated soils remediated by enhanced soil flushing. Environmental Engineering Science 20(3), 197-206.
115. Suthersan, S.S., 1997. Remediation Engineering: Design Concepts, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
116. Theis, T.L., O'Carroll, D.M., Vogel, D.C., Lane, A.B., Collins, K., 2003. Systems analysis of pump-and-treat groundwater remediation. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 7(3), 177-181.
117. Tomlinson, D.W., Thomson, N.R., Johnson, R.L., Redman, J.D., 2003. Air distribution in the Borden aquifer during in situ air sparging. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 67(1-4), 113-132.
118. Urum, K., Pekdemir, T., Gopur, M., 2003. Optimum conditions for washing of crude oil-contaminated soil with biosurfactant solutions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection: Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B 81(3), 203-209.
119. USEPA, 1990. Handbook of in situ treatment of hazardous waste-contaminated soils. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 540-2-90-002, Washington, DC.
120. USEPA, 1995a. How to Evaluate alternative cleanup technologies for underground storage tank sites. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 510-B-95-007, Washington, DC.
121. USEPA, 1995b. Abstracts of remediation case studies. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication number EPA-542-R-95-001, Washington, DC.
122. USEPA, 1996a. A citizen's guide to soil washing. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency Publication # EPA 542-F-96-002, Washington, DC.
123. USEPA, 1996b. In situ soil vapor extraction. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, http://www.epa.gov/techinfo/case/comm/soilvape.hml
124. USEPA, 1996c. A citizen's guide to natural attenuation. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 542-F-96-015, Washington, DC.
125. USEPA, 1996d. A citizen's guide to treatment walls. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 542-F-96-016, Washington, DC.
126. USEPA, 1996e. A citizen's guide to in situ soil flushing. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 542-F-96-006, Washington, DC.
127. USEPA, 1996f. A citizen's guide to in situ thermal desorption. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 542-F-96-005, Washington, DC.
128. USEPA, 1996g. A citizen's guide to phytoremediation. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 542-F-96-014, Washington, DC.
129. USEPA, 1996h. A citizen's guide to bioremediation. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 542-F-96-007, Washington, DC.
130. USEPA, 1998a. Soil vapor extraction (SVE). Office of the Underground Storage Tank, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 510-B-95-007, http://www.epa.gov/swerust1/cat/sve1.htm
131. USEPA, 1998b. Landfarming. Office of the Underground Storage Tank, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 510-B-95-007. http://www.epa.gov/swerust/cat/landfarm.htm
132. USEPA, 1998c. Biosparging. Office of the Underground Storage Tank, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 510-B-95-007, http://www.epa.gov/oust/cat/biosparg.htm
133. USEPA, 1998d. Bioventing. Office of the Underground Storage Tank, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 510-B-95-007, http://www.epa.gov/OUST/cat/biovent.htm
134. USEPA, 1998e. Biopiles. Office of the Underground Storage Tank, US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 510-B-95-007, http://www.epa.gov/swerust1/cat/biopiles.htm
135. USEPA, 1998f. Field Application of in situ remediation technologies: ground-water circulation wells. US Environmental Protection Agency. Publication # EPA 542-R-98-009, Washington, DC.
136. Vouillamoz, J., Milke, M.W., 2001. Effect of compost in phytoremediation of diesel-contaminated soils. Water Science and Technology 43(2), 291-295.
137. Wait, S.T., Thomas, D., 2003. The Characterization of Base Oil Recovered From the Low Temperature Thermal Desorption of Drill Cuttings, SPE/EPA Exploration and Production Environmental Conference, Mar 10-12, San Antonio, TX, pp. 151-158.
138. Wiedemeier, T.H., Newell, C.J., Rifai, H.S., Wilson, J.T., 1999. Natural Attenuation of Fuels and Chlorinated Solvents in the Subsurface, Wiley, New York.
139. Wilk, C.M., 2003. Solidification/stabilization treatment: principles and practice. Air and Waste Management Association's Magazine for Environmental Managers July, 31-37.
140. Woinarski, A.Z., Snape, I., Stevens, G.W., Stark, S.C., 2003. The effects of cold temperature on copper ion exchange by natural zeolite for use in a permeable reactive barrier in Antarctica. Cold Regions Science and Technology 37(2), 159-168.
141. Yen, H.K., Chang, N.B., Lin, T.F., 2003. Bioslurping model for assessing light hydrocarbon recovery in contaminated unconfined aquifer. I: Simulation analysis. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 7(2), 114-130.
142. Yeung, A.T., Hsu, H.T., 2002. Semi-analytical simulation of soil vapor extraction. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 6(1), 14-22.
143. Zhan, H., Park, E., 2002. Vapor flow to horizontal wells in unsaturated zones. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66(3), 710-721.
144. Zhang, C., Daprato, R.C., Nishino, S.F., Spain, J.C., Hughes, J.B., 2001. Remediation of dinitrotoluene contaminated soils from former ammunition plants: Soil washing efficiency and effective process monitoring in bioslurry reactors. Journal of Hazardous Materials 87(1-3), 139-154.
145. Zheng, C., Wang, P.P., 2002. A field demonstration of the simulation optimization approach for remediation system design. Ground Water 40(3), 258-265.