Measuring resilience and recovery

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Volumn 19, Issue , 2016, Pages 447-460

  Platt, Stephen ^a   Brown, Daniel ^a   Hughes, Martin ^a  

^a CAMBRIDGE ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH LTD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disasters; Indicators; Measurement; Recovery; Resilience

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991791025     PISSN: 22124209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. [1] Alexander, D., Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (2013), 2707–2716.
2. [2] M. Baatz, A. Schäpe, Multiresolution Segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. AGIT Symposium Angewandte Geographische Informations-Verarbeitung XII ed. J Strobl et al., 2000. (www.ecognition.cc/download/baatz_schaepe.pdf). (accessed April 26, 2016).
3. [3] Bello, O., Aina, Y., Satellite remote sensing as a tool in disaster management and sustainable development: towards a synergistic approach. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 120 (2014), 365–373.
4. [4] Benz, U., Hofmann, P., Willhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I., Heynen, M., Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS. J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 58:3 (2004), 239–258.
5. [5] Bevington, J., Adams, B., Eguchi, R., GEO-CAN debuts to map Haiti damage. Imaging Notes, 25, 2010, 2.
6. [6] J. Bioucas-Dias, A. Plaza, G. Camps-Valls, P. Scheunders, N. Nasrabadi, J. Chanussot, Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenge. ( ieeexplore.ieee.org). (Accessed 27/11/15).
7. [7] Blaschke, T., Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 65 (2010), 2–16.
8. [8] Blaschke, T., Strobl, J., What's wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and GIS. GIS – Z. für Geoinf. Syst. 14:6 (2001), 12–17.
9. [9] D. Brown, S. Platt, J. Bevington, Disaster Recovery Indicators: guidelines for monitoring and evaluation. CURBE, Cambridge University Centre for Risk in the Built Environment. University of Cambridge. 2010. (www.martincentre.arct.cam.ac.uk/downloads/disaster-recovery-indicators).
10. [10] Brown, D., Platt, S., Bevington, J., Saito, K., Adams, B., Chenvidyakarn, T., Spence, R., Chuenpagdee, R., Khan, A., Monitoring and Evaluating Post-Disaster Recovery Using High-Resolution Satellite Imagery – Towards Standardised Indicators for Post-Disaster Recovery. 2011, Martin Centre, Cambridge.
11. [11] Bruneau, M., Chang, S., Eguchi, R., Lee, G., O'Rourke, T., Reinhorn, A., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W., von Winterfelt, D., A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq. Spectra 19:4 (2003), 733–752.
12. [12] M. Bruneau, A. Reinhorn, Overview of the Resilience Concept. in: Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, April 18-22, San Francisco, California, USA Paper No. 2040, 2006.
13. [13] Burnett, C., Blaschke, T., A multi-scale segmentation/object relationship modelling methodology for landscape analysis. Ecol. Model. 168:3 (2003), 233–249.
14. [14] Câmara, G., Souza, R., Freitas, U., Garrido, J., Spring: Integrating remote sensing and GIS by object-oriented data modeling. Comput. Graph. 20:3 (1996), 395–403.
15. [15] Chang, S., Shinozuk, M., Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities. Earthq. Spectra, 20, 2004, 739–755.
16. [16] Centre for Research on Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) for the Period: 2005–2014. Available from: (http://www.cred.be/).
17. [17] CRED, EM-DAT The Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), 2015. (http://www.emdat.be).
18. [18] Dal, X., Khorram, S., Remotely sensed change detection based on artificial neural networks. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 65:10 (1999), 1187–1194.
19. [19] DigitalGlobe, 2015. (http://www.digitalglobeblog.com/2015/04/26/digitalglobe-opens-access-to-satellite-data-to-support-disaster-response-efforts-in-nepal/). (Accessed 6/9/15).
20. [20] Eguchi, R., Goltz, J., Taylor, C., Chang, S., Flores, P., Johnson, L., Seligson, H., Blais, N., Direct economic losses in the Northridge earthquake: a three-year post-event perspective. Earthq. Spectra 14:2 (1998), 245–264.
21. [21] Foulser-Piggott, R., Spence, R., Eguchi, R., King, A., Using remote sensing for building damage assessment: the GEOCAN study and validation for the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Earthq. Spectra 32:1 (2016), 611–631.
22. [22] G. Franco, Earthquake mitigation strategies through insurance. In: M. Beer, I. Kougioumtzoglou, E. Patelli, A. Siu-Kui (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering.
23. [23] S. Ganeshan, W. Diamond, Forecasting the numbers of people affected annually by natural disasters up to 2015. Oxfam GB, 2009. (www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/forecasting-disasters-2015.pdf). (Accessed 27/10/15).
24. [24] Geiß, C., Taubenböck, H., Remote Sensing contributing to assess earthquake risk – from a literature review towards a road map. Nat. Hazards. 68:1 (2013), 7–48.
25. [25] Geiß, C., Taubenböck, H., Post, J., Tisch, A., Tyagunov, S., Lakes, T., Assessment of buildings' seismic vulnerability from space. Earthq. Spectra 30:4 (2014), 1553–1583.
26. [26] Girard, T., Wenzel, F., Khazai, B., Kunz-Plapp, T., James, E., Daniell, J., Brink, S., Near-real-time analysis of publicly communicated disaster response information. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 5 (2014), 165–175.
27. [27] Goodchild, M., Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. Geojournal, 2007, 1–12.
28. [28] Goodchild, M., Li, L., Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spat. Stat. 1:1 (2012), 110–120.
29. [29] Guha-Sapir, D., Below, R., Hoyois, P., EM-DAT: International Disaster Database. 2016, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (www.emdat.be).
30. [30] Imagecat, VIEWSTM, 2010. (http://www.imagecatinc.com/services/proprietary-solutions/views/).
31. [31] Jiang, D., Huang, Y., Zhuang, D., Zhu, Y., Xu, X., Ren, H., A simple semi-automatic approach for land cover classification from multispectral remote sensing imagery. PLoS One, 9, 2012, 7 (www.plosone.org).
32. [32] Keck, M., Sakdapolrak, P., What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde 67:1 (2013), 5–19.
33. [33] Kerle, N., Hoffman, R., Collaborative damage mapping for emergency response: the role of Cognitive Systems Engineering. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (2013), 97–113.
34. [34] B. Khazai, J. Anhorn, S. Brink, T. Girard, G. Kumar Jimee, B. Parajuli, S. Wagle, O. Khanal, S. Shresta, R. Manandhar, Emergent Issues and Vulnerability Factors in Temporary and Intermediate Shelters Following the 2015 Nepal Earthquake. Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology (CEDIM) Karlsruhr Institute of Technology, 2015.
35. [35] Mück, M., Taubenböck, H., Post, J., Wegscheider, S., Strunz, G., Sumaryono, Ismail, F.A., Assessing building vulnerability to earthquake and tsunami hazard using remotely sensed data. Nat. Hazards 68:1 (2013), 97–114.
36. [36] O. Murao, Y. Mitsuda, A. Miyamoto, T. Sasaki, H. Nakazato, T. Hayashi, Recovery curves and digital city of chi-chi as urban recovery digital archives. in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Urban Disaster Reduction. November 27-29, 2007.
37. [37] Olshansky, R., Johnson, L., Topping, K., Rebuilding communities following disaster: lessons from Kobe and Los Angeles. Built Environ. 32:4 (2006), 354–374.
38. [38] S, Platt, Recovery User Needs Survey. Cambridge Architectural Research, 2008.
39. [39] S. Platt, E. So, J. Bevington, E. Verrucci, E. So, M. Pittore, Thinking fast, thinking slow: bridging the gap between research and practice in disaster recovery. in: Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, (Istanbul, Aug), 2014, pp. 25–29.
40. [40] Psychology Today, 2014. (www.psychologytoday.com/basics/resilience). (Accessed 10/6/14).
41. [41] U. Rebbapragada, T. Oommen, Integrating machine learning into a crowdsourced model for earthquake-induced damage assessment. Appearing in ICML 2011 Workshop on Machine Learning for Global Challenges, Bellevue,WA, USA, 2011. (Accessed 10/11/15).
42. [42] ReliefWeb, 2014. Web site. (http://reliefweb.int/about). (Accessed 10/11/15).
43. [43] E. So, S. Wang, D. Pitts, E. Verrucci, Preliminary protocols on the Use of Semi-automated and automated Techniques for planning and Monitoring post Disaster Recovery (SENSUM Deliverable 5.2), 2014.
44. [44] Taubenböck, H., Roth, A., Dech, S., Mehl, H., The capabilities of remote sensing to support disaster management: a case study of the district Üsküdar in Istanbul, Turkey. Turk. J. Disaster, 2(1), 2007, 6.
45. [45] Taubenböck, H., Geiß, C., Vulnerability and resilience research – a critical perspective. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 5 (2014), 86–87.
46. [46] Tomnod, 2015. (http://www.tomnod.com/campaign/nepal_earthquake_2015/map/3n1xmy67). (Accessed 6/9/15).
47. [47] UK Cabinet Office, Resilience in society: infrastructure, communities and businesses, 2013 (https://www.gov.uk/resilience-in-society-infrastructure-communities-and-businesses).
48. [48] UNISDR, Terminology, 2007. (https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology). (Accessed 2 May 2016).
49. [49] UNOCHA, Guidance note on early recovery, 2008. (https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/Guidance%20note%20on%20Early%20Recovery.pdf). (Accessed 2 May 2016).
50. [50] Van Westen, C., Remote sensing for natural disaster management. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens., XXXIII(Part B7), 2000.
51. [51] Vogt, A., Haala, N., Schanze, J., Building parameters extraction from remote sensing data and GIS analysis for the derivation of a building taxonomy of settlements – a contribution to flood building susceptibility assessment. Int. J. Image Data Fusion, 6(1), 2015, 2015.
52. [52] Walter, V., Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 58 (2004), 225–238.
53. [53] Wurm, M., Schmitt, A., Taubenböck, H., Building types classification using shape-based features and linear discriminant functions. JSTARS, 2015, 12.
54. [54] Zhou, H., Wang, J., Wan, J., Jia, H., Resilience to natural hazards: a geographic perspective. Nat. Hazards 53:1 (2010), 21–41.
55. [55] Zolli, A., Healy, A., Resilience: Why Things Bounce Back. 2012, Free Press, New York.
56. [56] W. Petak, S. Elahi. The Northridge earthquake, USA, and its economic and social impact. in: Proceedings of the Euro-Conference on Global Change and Catastrophe Risk Management, Earthquake Risks in Europe, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 2000.