Research prioritization through prediction of future impact on biomedical science: A position paper on inference-analytics

GigaScience

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Ganapathiraju, Madhavi K ^a,b   Orii, Naoki ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Big data; Data analytics; Impact prediction; Inference analytics; Protein protein interaction prediction

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICINE; DATA ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; INFERENCE ANALYTICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH PRIORITY;

EID: 84991527393     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2047217X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2047-217X-2-11     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Amazon mechanical turk. www.mturk.com.
2. Den Hartigh JC, Van Bergen En Henegouwen PM, Verkleij AJ, Boonstra J: The EGF receptor is an actin-binding protein. J Cell Biol 1992, 119:349-355.
3. Gehrke J, Ginsparg P, Kleinberg J: Overview of the 2003 KDD Cup. SIGKDD Explor Newsl 2003, 5:149-151.
4. Fu LD, Aliferis C: Models for predicting and explaining citation count of biomedical articles. AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings/AMIA Symposium AMIA Symposium; 2008:222-226.
5. Ibanez A, Larranaga P, Bielza C: Predicting citation count of Bioinformatics papers within four years of publication. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:3303-3309.
6. Bornmann L, Daniel HD: What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. J Doc 2008, 64:45-80.
7. Stumpf MP, Thorne T, de Silva E, Stewart R, An HJ, Lappe M, Wiuf C: Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:6959-6964.
8. Venkatesan K, Rual JF, Vazquez A, Stelzl U, Lemmens I, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Hao T, Zenkner M, Xin X, Goh KI, et al: An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods 2009, 6:83-90.
9. Ramírez F, Schlicker A, Assenov Y, Lengauer T, Albrecht M: Computational analysis of human protein interaction networks. Proteomics 2007, 7:2541-2552.
10. Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR: Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part I. Experimental techniques and databases. PLoS computational biology 2007, 3:e42.
11. Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR: Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part II. Computational methods to predict protein and domain interaction partners. PLoS computational biology 2007, 3:e43.
12. Qi Y, Dhiman HK, Bhola N, Budyak I, Kar S, Man D, Dutta A, Tirupula K, Carr BI, Grandis J, et al: Systematic prediction of human membrane receptor interactions. Proteomics 2009, 9:5243-5255.
13. Scott MS, Barton GJ: Probabilistic prediction and ranking of human protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinforma 2007, 8:239.
14. Ananthasubramanian S, Metri R, Khetan A, Gupta A, Handen A, Chandra N, Ganapathiraju M: Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Clostridium difficille interactomes: demonstration of rapid development of computational system for bacterial interactome prediction. Microbial informatics and experimentation 2012, 2:4.
15. Ma X, Gao L: Biological network analysis: insights into structure and functions. Briefings in functional genomics 2012, 11:434-442.
16. Bultinck J, Lievens S, Tavernier J: Protein-protein interactions: network analysis and applications in drug discovery. Current pharmaceutical design 2012, 18:4619-4629.
17. Cui T, Zhang L, Wang X, He ZG: Uncovering new signaling proteins and potential drug targets through the interactome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:118.
18. Azmi AS, Wang Z, Philip PA, Mohammad RM, Sarkar FH: Proof of concept: network and systems biology approaches aid in the discovery of potent anticancer drug combinations. Molecular cancer therapeutics 2010, 9:3137-3144.
19. Barabasi AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J: Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nature reviews Genetics 2011, 12:56-68.
20. Prasad TSK, Goel R, Kandasamy K, Keerthikumar S, Kumar S, Mathivanan S, Telikicherla D, Raju R, Shafreen B, Venugopal A, et al: Human protein reference database-2009 update. Nucleic acids research 2009, 37:D767-D772.
21. Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Chatr-Aryamontri A, Boucher L, Oughtred R, Livstone MS, Nixon J, Van Auken K, Wang X, Shi X, et al: The BioGRID interaction database: 2011 update. Nucleic acids research 2011, 39:D698-D704.
22. The Entrez programming utilities. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25501/.
23. Wasserman S, Faust K: Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
24. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN: Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nature reviews Genetics 2004, 5:101-113.
25. Mason O, Verwoerd M: Graph theory and networks in biology. IET systems biology 2007, 1:89-119.
26. Yu H, Greenbaum D, Xin Lu H, Zhu X, Gerstein M: Genomic analysis of essentiality within protein networks. Trends in genetics: TIG 2004, 20:227-231.
27. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN: Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001, 411:41-42.
28. Goh KI, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabasi AL: The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:8685-8690.
29. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T: Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:431-432.
30. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T: Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003, 13:2498-2504.
31. Kohl M, Wiese S, Warscheid B: Cytoscape: software for visualization and analysis of biological networks. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 696:291-303.
32. Stanford network analysis library. http://snap.stanford.edu/snap/.
33. Hagberg A, Schult D, Swart P: Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. SciPy 2008: Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference; 2008:11-15.
34. Freeman L: A Set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 1977, 40:35-41.
35. Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T: The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the Web. Stanford InfoLab: Technical Report; 1998.
36. Brandes U: On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation. Soc Networks 2008, 30:136-145.
37. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, et al: Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 2011, 12:2825-2830.
38. Breiman L: Random forests. Mach Learn 2001, 45:5-32.
39. Kingsford C, Salzberg SL: What are decision trees? Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1011-1013.
40. Chen XW, Liu M: Prediction of protein-protein interactions using random decision forest framework. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:4394-4400.
41. Davis J, Goadrich M: The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning; 2006:233-240. 1143874: ACM.
42. Orii N, Ganapathiraju MK: Wiki-pi: a web-server of annotated human protein-protein interactions to aid in discovery of protein function. PloS one 2012, 7:e49029.
43. Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M: BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:3448-3449.
44. Hirschhorn JN: Genomewide association studies-illuminating biologic pathways. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:1699-1701.
45. A catalog of published genome-wide association studies. www.genome.gov/gwastudies July 17th, 2012.
46. Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, Collins FS, Manolio TA: Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:9362-9367.
47. Hakes L, Pinney JW, Robertson DL, Lovell SC: Protein-protein interaction networks and biology-what's the connection? Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:69-72.