Current and future distribution of the tropical tree Cedrela Odorata L. in Mexico under Climate Change Scenarios Using Maxlike

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

  Estrada Contreras, Israel ^a   Equihua, Miguel ^a   Laborde, Javier ^b   Meyer, Enrique Martinez ^c   Sanchez Velasquez, Lazaro R ^d  

^a Instituto de Ecologa AC   (Mexico)

^b Instituto de Ecologa AC   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^d UNIVERSIDAD VERACRUZANA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CEDRELA; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEXICO; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PLANTATION; PROBABILITY; SPECIES; ALGORITHM; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOREST; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; TREE; TROPIC CLIMATE;

ALGORITHMS; BIODIVERSITY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CEDRELA; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORESTS; MEXICO; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROBABILITY; TREES; TROPICAL CLIMATE;

EID: 84991444246     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164178     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Le Treut H, Somerville R, Cubasch U, Ding Y, Mauritzen C, Mokssit A, et al. Historical Overview of Climate Change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, et al. Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2007. pp. 93-127.
2. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al. Cambio Climaa tico 2013: Bases fõasicas. Contribucioan del Grupo de Trabajo I al Quinto Informe de Evaluacioan del Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climaa tico. Resumen para responsables de polõaticas. Cambridge, Reino Unido y Nueva York, NY, Estados Unidos de Amea rica: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
3. Biodiversity Connecting and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Report of the Second Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change. Technical Series No. 41. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; 2009.
4. Halpin PN. Global climate change and natural-Area protection: management responses and research directions. Ecol. Appl. 1997; 7: 828-843. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007%5B0828:GCCANA% 5D2.0.CO;2
5. Pistorius T. Co-benefits on paper vs. multiple benefits on the ground. In: Bodegom V, Jan A, Savenije H, Wit M. Forests and Climate Change: Adaptation and mitigation. Tropenbos International; 2009, pp. 11-18.
6. Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, et al. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for policymakers. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
7. Fearnside PM. Global warming in Amazonia: impacts and mitigation. Acta Amazon. 2009; 39: 1003-1012. doi: 10.1590/S0044-59672009000400030
8. Laurance WF. A new initiative to use carbon trading for tropical forest conservation. Biotropica. 2007; 39: 20-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00229.x
9. Fearnside PM. Estoque e estabilidade do carbono nos solos na AmazoÃnia brasileira. In: Teixeira W, Madari B, Benites V, Kern D, Falcão N. As Terras Pretas deIandio: CaracterizacËão e manejo para formac Ëão de novas aareas. Brazil: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaa ria (EMBRAPA); 2009. pp. 259-262.
10. Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, et al. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
11. Xu D, Zhang X-Q, Shi Z. Mitigation potential for carbon sequestration through forestry activities in southern and eastern China. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 2001; 6: 213-232.
12. Broadhead J, Durst P, Brown Ch. Climate change: will it change how we manage forests? In: Bodegom V, Jan A, Savenije H, Wit M. Forests and Climate Change: Adaptation and mitigation. Tropenbos International; 2009, pp. 57-65.
13. Putz F, Zuidema P. Conserving carbon in tropical forests: pitfalls and possibilities. In: Bodegom V, Jan A, Savenije H, Wit M. Forests and Climate Change: Adaptation and mitigation. Tropenbos International; 2009, pp. 19-24.
14. Meaxico Tercera Comunicacioan Nacional ante la Convencioan Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climaa tico. Meaxico: INE-SEMARNAT (Instituto Nacional de Ecologõaa-Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales); 2006.
15. Villaseñor JL. Los geaneros de plantas vasculares de la flora de Mea xico. Boletin de la Sociedad Botaanica de Meaxico. 2004; 75: 105-135.
16. Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden. [cited 15 July 2015]. Available: http://www.tropicos.org
17. Galaan R, De los Santos HM, Valdez JI. Crecimiento y rendimiento de Cedrela odorata L. y Tabebuia donnell-smithii Rose en San Josea Chacalapa, Pochutla, Oaxaca. Madera y Bosques. 2008; 14: 65-82.
18. Bertoni VR. Trabajos realizados sobre plantaciones forestales, en el campo Experimental Forestal Tropical El Tormento. In: Reunioan Nacional de Plantaciones Forestales. Meaxico: INIF; 1978. pp. 287-291.
19. Pennington TD, Sarukhaan J.Aa rboles tropicales de Mea xico. Manual para la identificacioan de las principales especies. 2nd ed. Mea xico: Universidad Nacional Autoanoma de Meaxico-Fondo de Cultura Econo amica; 1998.
20. Sistema Nacional de Informacioan Forestal (SIRE). Cedrela odorata L. [cited 15 May 2015] Comisioan Nacional Forestal-Comisioan Nacional para el Concimiento y uso de la Biodiversidad. Mea xico. Available: http://www.conafor.gob.mx:8080/documentos/docs/13/898Cedrela%20odorata.pdf
21. Vaazquez-Yanes C, Batis AI, Alcocer M.I, Gual M, Saanchez C.Aa rboles y arbustos potencialmente valiosos para la restauracioan ecoloagica y la reforestacioa n. Reporte teacnico del proyecto J084. Mexico: CONABIO-Instituto de Ecologõaa, UNAM; 1999.
22. Cintron B. Cedrela odorata L. Cedro hembra, Spanish cedar. In: Russell B, Honkala B. Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture. Forest Service; 1990. 250-257.
23. Niembro A, Vaazquez M, Saanchez O.Aa rboles de Veracruz. 100 especies para la reforestacioan estratea-gica. Mexico: Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, Secretarõaa de Educacioan del Estado de Veracruz, Comisioan del Estado de Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave para la conmemoracioan de la Independencia Nacional y la Revolucioan, Centro de Investigaciones Tropicales; 2010.
24. Ramõarez-Garcõaa C, Vera-Castillo G, Carrillo-Anzures F, Magaña-Torres OS. El cedro rojo (Cedrela odorata L.) como alternativa de reconversioan en terrenos abandonados por la agricultura comercial en el sur de Tamaulipas. Agricultura Teacnica en Meaxico. 2008; 34: 243-250.
25. Peterson AT. Predicting species' geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor. 2001; 103: 599-605.
26. Anderson RP, Lew D, Peterson AT. Evaluating predictive models of species distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecological Modeling. 2003; 162: 211-232. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02) 00349-6
27. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudõak M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 2006; 29: 129-151.
28. Franklin J. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511810602
29. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling. 2006; 190: 231-259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
30. Jaynes ET. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review. 1957; 106: 620-630. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.106.620
31. Royle JA, Chandler RB, Yackulic C, Nichols JD. Likelihood analysis of species occurrence probability from presence-only data for modelling species distributions. Methods Ecol Evol. 2012; 3: 545-554. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00182.x
32. Merow C, Silander JA Jr. A comparison of Maxlike and Maxent for modelling species distributions. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013: 1-11. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12152
33. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2014. Available: http://www.R-project.org/
34. Saaenz-Romero C, Rehfeldt GE, Crookston NL, Duval P, St-Amant R, Beaulieu J, et al. Spline models of contemporary, 2030, 2060 and 2090 climates for Mexico and their use in understanding climatechange impacts on the vegetation. Clim Change. 2010; 102: 595-623.
35. Nakicenovic N, Davidson O, Davis G, GruÈbler A, Kram T, La Rovere EL, et al. Escenarios de emisiones. Informe especial del Grupo de trabajo III del Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climaa tico. Resumen para responsables de polõaticas. OMM-PNUMA-IPCC; 2000.
36. Lobo JM, Jimeanez-Valverde A, Real R. AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2007; 17: 145-151. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x
37. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982; 143: 29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
38. Fielding AH, Bell JF. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv. 1997; 24: 38-49. doi: 10.1017/S0376892997000088
39. Segurado P, Araua jo MB. An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions. J Biogegr. 2004; 31: 1555-1568. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01076.x
40. Muñoz J, Felicõasimo AM. Comparison of statistical methods commonly used in predictive modelling. J. Veg. Sci. 2004; 15: 285-292.
41. Peterson AT, Papes M, Soberoan J. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecological Modelling. 2008; 213: 63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007. 11.008
42. Barve N. Tool for Partial-ROC ver. 1.0. Lawrence, KS: Biodiversity Institute. 2008.
43. Instituto Nacional de Estadõastica Geografõaa e Informaa tica (INEGI). Conjunto de datos vectoriales de Uso del Suelo y Vegetacioan Escala 1:250 000, SERIE V. Instituto Nacional de Estadõastica, Geografõaa e Informaa tica, Mea xico. 2013. Available: http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/usosuelo/
44. Comisioan Nacional deAa reas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP).Aa reas Naturales Protegidas Federales de Meaxico. Comisioan Nacional deAa reas Naturales Protegidas, Mexico. 2012. Available: http://sig. conanp.gob.mx/website/pagsig/informacion/vistaprevia1.htm
45. Brown JL. SDMtoolbox: A python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014; 5: 694-700. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12200
46. Jump AS, Peñuelas J. Running to stand still: Adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol Lett. 2005; 8: 1010-1020. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00796.x
47. Goamez JD, Monterroso AI, Tinoco JAa . Distribucioan del cedro rojo (Cedrela odorata L.) en el estado de Hidalgo, bajo condiciones actuales y escenarios de cambio climaa tico. Madera y Bosques. 2007; 13: 29-49.
48. Cornelius JP, Watt AD. Genetic variation in a Hypsipyla-Attacked clonal trial of Cedrela odorata under two pruning regimes. For Ecol Manage. 2003; 183: 341-349. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00142-7
49. Challenger A, Caballero J. Utilizacioan y conservacioan de los ecosistemas terrestres de Mea xico: pasado, presente y futuro. Meaxico: Comisioan Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad; 1998.
50. Warren R, VanDerWal J, Price J, Welbergen JA, Atkinson I, Ramirez-Villegas J, et al. Quantifying the benefit of early climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2013; 3: 678-682.
51. Mendizaabal-Hernaandez LC, Alba-Landa J, Suaarez-Dorantes T. Captura de carbono por Cedrela odorata L. en una plantacioan de origen genea tico conocido. Foresta Veracruzana. 2009; 11: 13-18.
52. Morales ER, Herrera LG. Cedro (Cedrela odorata L.) Protocolo para su colecta, beneficio y almacenaje. Meaxico: Comisioan Nacional Forestal, Regioan XII Penõansula de Yucataa n; 2009.
53. Fitzpatrick MC, Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM. MaxEnt versus MaxLike: empirical comparisons with ant species distributions. Ecosphere. 2013; 4: 55. doi: 10.1890/ES13-00066.1
54. Warton DI, Shepherd LC. Poisson point process models solve the pseudo-Absence problem for presence-only data in ecology. Ann Appl Stat. 2010; 4: 1383-1402.
55. Dorazio RM. Predicting the geographic distribution of a species from presence-only data subject to detection errors. Biometrics. 2012; 68: 1303-1312. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01779.x