Diagnostic accuracy of the Salzburg EEG criteria for non-convulsive status epilepticus: a retrospective study

The Lancet Neurology

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1054-1062

  Leitinger, Markus ^a,b   Trinka, Eugen ^a,b   Gardella, Elena ^d,e   Rohracher, Alexandra ^a,b   Kalss, Gudrun ^a,b   Qerama, Erisela ^f   Höfler, Julia ^a,b   Hess, Alexander ^f   Zimmermann, Georg ^a,b   Kuchukhidze, Giorgi ^a,b,c   Dobesberger, Judith ^a,b   Langthaler, Patrick B ^a,b   Beniczky, Sándor ^d,f  

^a PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

^c INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^d DANISH EPILEPSY CENTRE   (Denmark)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^f AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICONVULSIVE AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTICONVULSANT THERAPY; ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; CHILD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPTIC DISCHARGE; EPILEPTIC STATE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NON CONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; STATUS EPILEPTICUS; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATUS EPILEPTICUS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84991105194     PISSN: 14744422     EISSN: 14744465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30137-5     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. 1 Trinka, E, Cock, H, Hesdorffer, D, et al. A definition and classification of status epilepticus - Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus. Epilepsia 56 (2015), 1515–1523.
2. 2 Young, GB, Jordan, KG, Doig, GS, An assessment of nonconvulsive seizures in the intensive care unit using continuous EEG monitoring: an investigation of variables associated with mortality. Neurology 47 (1996), 83–89.
3. 3 Shorvon, S, The outcome of tonic-clonic status epilepticus. Curr Opin Neurol 7 (1994), 93–95.
4. 4 Bauer, G, Trinka, E, Nonconvulsive status epilepticus and coma. Epilepsia 51 (2010), 177–190.
5. 5 Litt, B, Wityk, RJ, Hertz, SH, et al. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the critically ill elderly. Epilepsia 39 (1998), 1194–1202.
6. 6 Trinka, E, Leitinger, M, Which EEG patterns in coma are nonconvulsive status epilepticus?. Epilepsy Behav 49 (2015), 203–222.
7. 7 Chong, DJ, Hirsch, LJ, Which EEG patterns warrant treatment in the critically ill? Reviewing the evidence for treatment of periodic epileptiform discharges and related patterns. J Clin Neurophysiol 22 (2005), 79–91.
8. 8 Hirsch, LJ, Brenner, RP, Drislane, FW, et al. The ACNS subcommittee on research terminology for continuous EEG monitoring: proposed standardized terminology for rhythmic and periodic EEG patterns encountered in critically ill patients. J Clin Neurophysiol 22 (2005), 128–135.
9. 9 Hirsch, LJ, LaRoche, SM, Gaspard, N, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2012 version. J Clin Neurophysiol 30 (2013), 1–27.
10. 10 Kaplan, PW, EEG criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia 48:suppl 8 (2007), 39–41.
11. 11 Sutter, R, Kaplan, PW, Electroencephalographic criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus: synopsis and comprehensive survey. Epilepsia 53:suppl 3 (2012), 1–51.
12. 12 Beniczky, S, Hirsch, LJ, Kaplan, PW, et al. Unified EEG terminology and criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia 54:suppl 6 (2013), 28–29.
13. 13 Leitinger, M, Beniczky, S, Rohracher, A, et al. Salzburg Consensus Criteria for Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus-approach to clinical application. Epilepsy Behav 49 (2015), 158–163.
14. 14 Beniczky, S, Aurlien, H, Brøgger, JC, et al. Standardized computer-based organized reporting of EEG: SCORE. Epilepsia 54 (2013), 1112–1124.
15. 15 Bossuyt, PM, Reitsma, JB, Bruns, DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 326 (2003), 41–44.
16. 16 Weller, SC, Mann, NC, Assessing rater performance without a “gold standard” using consensus theory. Med Decis Making 17 (1997), 71–79.
17. 17 Berg, AT, Berkovic, SF, Brodie, MJ, et al. Revised terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies: report of the ILAE Commission on Classification and Terminology, 2005–2009. Epilepsia 51 (2010), 676–685.
18. 18 Pearson, ES, The choice of statistical tests illustrated on the interpretation of data classed in a 2 × 2 table. Biometrika 34 (1947), 139–167.
19. 19 Irwin, JO, Tests of significance for differences between percentages based on small numbers. Metron 12 (1935), 83–94.
20. 20 Campbell, I, Chi-squared an Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Stat Med 26 (2007), 3661–3675.
21. 21 Pearson, K, On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philos Mag Ser 5 50 (1900), 157–172.
22. 2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. J R Stat Soc 85 (1922), 87–94.
23. 23 Benjamini, Y, Hochberg, Y, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57 (1995), 289–300.
24. 24 Lange, K, Brunner, E, Analysis of predictive values based on individual risk factors in multi-modality trials. Diagnostics 3 (2013), 192–209.
25. 25 Cantor, SB, Kattan, MW, Determining the Area under the ROC Curve for a Binary Diagnostic Test. Med Decis Making 20 (2000), 468–470.
26. 26 Gwet, KL, Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol 61 (2008), 29–48.
27. 27 Gaspard, N, Hirsch, LJ, LaRoche, SM, Hahn, CD, Westover, MB, Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium. Interrater agreement for Critical Care EEG Terminology. Epilepsia 55 (2014), 1366–1373.
28. 28 Wilson, EB, Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 22 (1927), 209–212.
29. 29 Vollset, SE, Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. Stat Med 12 (1993), 809–824.
30. 30 Agresti, A, Coull, BA, Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat 52 (1998), 119–126.
31. 31 Efron, B, Tibshirani, RJ, An introduction to the bootstrap, 3rd edn, 1993, Chapman and Hall, New York.
32. 32 Carpenter, J, Bithell, J, Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 19 (2000), 1141–1164.
33. 33 Landis, JR, Koch, GG, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977), 159–174.
34. 34 Leitinger, M, Kalss, G, Rohracher, A, et al. Predicting outcome of status epilepticus. Epilepsy Behav 49 (2015), 126–130.