Re-citation analysis: A promising method for improving citation analysis for research evaluation, knowledge network analysis, knowledge representation and information retrieval

Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1061-1065

  Zhao, Dangzhi ^a   Strotmann, Andreas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b ScienceXplore   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; PAPER;

CITATION ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS; LINK-BASED; RESEARCH EVALUATION; RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; SUBJECT INDEXING;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 84991094144     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Borgman, C.L. & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
2. Boyack, K. W., Small, H., & Klavans, R. (2013). Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(9), 1759-1767.
3. Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: an investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223-229.
4. Brooks, T. A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 34-36.
5. Case, D. O. & Higgins, G. M. (2000). How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 635-645.
6. Cronin, B. (1984). The Citation Process. The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication. London: Taylor Graham.
7. Chubin, D. E. & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423-441.
8. Ding, Y. & Cronin, B. (2011). Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Information Processing and Management, 47, 80-96.
9. Ding, Y., Liu, X., Guo, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 583-592.
10. Dubin, D. (2004). The Most Influential Paper Gerard Salton Never Wrote. Library trends, 52(4), 748-764.
11. Edge, D. (1979). Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science Cambridge, 17(36), 102-134.
12. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
13. Griffith, B. C. (1990). Understanding science: Studies of communication and information. In C. L. Borgman (ed.). Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, 33-45. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
14. Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36 (1), 16-38.
15. Herlach, G. (1978). Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(6), 308-310.
16. Hou, W., Li, M., & Niu, D. (2011). Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution. BioEssays, 33, 724-727.
17. Jeong, Y. K., Song, M., & Ding, Y. (2014). Content-based author co-citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 197-211.
18. Liu, M. (1993). The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49, 370-408.
19. Merton, R. K. (1942). Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115-126.
20. Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86-92.
21. Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity. Washington, D. C.: Computer Horizons.
22. Peritz, B. C. (1992). On the objectives of citation analysis: Problems of theory and method. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 448-451.
23. Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Gupta, S. K. S. (1995). Author judgements about works they cite: three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 477-498.
24. Small, H. (1977). A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 139-166.
25. Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 327-340.
26. Small, H. (1982). Citation context analysis. In B. J. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences, 3 (pp. 287-310). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 103-110). Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
28. Tranöy, K. E. (1980). Norms of inquiry: Rationality, consistency requirements and normative conflict. In Rationality in Science (pp. 191-202). Springer Netherlands.
29. Vinkler, P. (1987). A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics, 12(1), 47-72.
30. White, H. D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C. L. Borgman (ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (pp. 84-106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Zhao, D. & Strotmann, A. (2015). Dimensions and uncertainties of author citation rankings: Lessons learned from frequency-weighted in-text citation counting. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, doi: 10.1002/asi.23418.
32. Zhu, X., Turney, P., Lemire, D., & Vellino, A. (2014). Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Early view (DOI: 10.1002/asi.23179).