Noninvasively Measured Hemoglobin Concentration Reflects Arterial Hemoglobin Concentration Before but Not After Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery or Valve Surgery

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1167-1171

  Riess, Matthias L ^a,b   Pagel, Paul S ^c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c CLEMENT J ZABLOCKI VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

cardiac surgery; cardiopulmonary bypass; i STAT; instrumentation; Masimo Radical 7; noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

AGED; ARTERIAL BLOOD; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPERATING ROOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETER; PULSE OXIMETRY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; HEART VALVE; MIDDLE AGED; OXIMETRY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY VESSELS; HEART VALVES; HEMOGLOBINS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXIMETRY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84991093302     PISSN: 10530770     EISSN: 15328422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.03.148     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. 1 Rice, M.J., Gravenstein, N., Morey, T.E., Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring: How accurate is enough?. Anesth Analg 117 (2013), 902–907.
2. 2 Shamir, M.Y., Avramovich, A., Smaka, T., The current status of continuous noninvasive measurement of total, carboxy, and methemoglobin concentration. Anesth Analg 114 (2012), 972–978.
3. 3 Hiscock, R., Kumar, D., Simmons, S.W., Systematic review and meta-analysis of method comparison studies of Masimo pulse co-oximeters (Radical-7 or Pronto-7) and HemoCue(R) absorption spectrometers (B-Hemoglobin or 201+) with laboratory haemoglobin estimation. Anaesth Intensive Care 43 (2015), 341–350.
4. 4 Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986), 307–310.
5. 5 Hamilton, C., Lewis, S., The importance of using the correct bounds on the Bland-Altman limits of agreement when multiple measurements are recorded per patient. J Clin Monit Comput 24 (2010), 173–175.
6. 6 Hullett, B., Gibbs, N., Weightman, W., et al. A comparison of CardioQ and thermodilution cardiac output during off-pump coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 17 (2003), 728–732.
7. 7 Montenij, L.J., Buhre, W.F., de Jong, S.A., et al. Arterial pressure waveform analysis versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement during open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 32 (2015), 13–19.
8. 8 Morey, T.E., Gravenstein, N., Rice, M.J., Let's think clinically instead of mathematically about device accuracy. Anesth Analg 113 (2011), 89–91.
9. 9 Bruells, C.S., Menon, A.K., Rossaint, R., et al. Accuracy of the Masimo Pronto-7(R) system in patients with left ventricular assist device. J Cardiothorac Surg, 8, 2013, 159.
10. 10 American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood M: Practice guidelines for perioperative blood management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Management. Anesthesiology 122 (2015), 241–275.
11. 11 Park, Y.H., Lee, J.H., Song, H.G., et al. The accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring using the radical-7 pulse CO-Oximeter in children undergoing neurosurgery. Anesth Analg 115 (2012), 1302–1307.
12. 12 Jung, Y.H., Lee, J., Kim, H.S., et al. The efficacy of noninvasive hemoglobin measurement by pulse CO-oximetry in neonates. Pediatr Crit Care Med 14 (2013), 70–73.
13. 13 Amano, I., Murakami, A., Use of non-invasive total hemoglobin measurement as a screening tool for anemia in children. Pediatr Int 55 (2013), 803–805.
14. 14 Phillips, M.R., Khoury, A.L., Bortsov, A.V., et al. A noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Surg Res 195 (2015), 257–262.
15. 15 Bhat, A., Upadhyay, A., Jaiswal, V., et al. Validity of non-invasive point-of-care hemoglobin estimation in healthy and sick children-a method comparison study. Eur J Pediatr 175 (2016), 171–179.
16. 16 Berkow, L., Rotolo, S., Mirski, E., Continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring during complex spine surgery. Anesth Analg 113 (2011), 1396–1402.
17. 17 Miller, R.D., Ward, T.A., Shiboski, S.C., et al. A comparison of three methods of hemoglobin monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery. Anesth Analg 112 (2011), 858–863.
18. 18 Colquhoun, D.A., Forkin, K.T., Durieux, M.E., et al. Ability of the Masimo pulse CO-Oximeter to detect changes in hemoglobin. J Clin Monit Comput 26 (2012), 69–73.
19. 19 Moore, L.J., Wade, C.E., Vincent, L., et al. Evaluation of noninvasive hemoglobin measurements in trauma patients. Am J Surg 206 (2013), 1041–1047.
20. 20 Galvagno, S.M. Jr., Hu, P., Yang, S., et al. Accuracy of continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring for the prediction of blood transfusions in trauma patients. J Clin Monit Comput 29 (2015), 815–821.
21. 21 Butwick, A.J., Hilton, G., Riley, E.T., et al. Non-invasive measurement of hemoglobin during cesarean hysterectomy: A case series. Int J Obstet Anesth 20 (2011), 240–245.
22. 22 Skelton, V.A., Wijayasinghe, N., Sharafudeen, S., et al. Evaluation of point-of-care haemoglobin measuring devices: A comparison of Radical-7 pulse co-oximetry, HemoCue(R) and laboratory haemoglobin measurements in obstetric patients. Anaesthesia 68 (2013), 40–45.
23. 23 Hiscock, R., Simmons, S., Carstensen, B., et al. Comparison of Massimo Pronto-7 and HemoCue Hb 201+with laboratory haemoglobin estimation: A clinical study. Anaesth Intensive Care 42 (2014), 608–613.
24. 24 Lamhaut, L., Apriotesei, R., Combes, X., et al. Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring by spectrophotometry (SpHb) and HemoCue(R) with automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement. Anesthesiology 115 (2011), 548–554.
25. 25 Applegate, R.L. 2nd, Barr, S.J., Collier, C.E., et al. Evaluation of pulse cooximetry in patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery. Anesthesiology 116 (2012), 65–72.
26. 26 Vos, J.J., Kalmar, A.F., Struys, M.M., et al. Accuracy of non-invasive measurement of haemoglobin concentration by pulse co-oximetry during steady-state and dynamic conditions in liver surgery. Br J Anaesth 109 (2012), 522–528.
27. 27 Knutson, T., Della-Giustina, D., Tomich, E., et al. Evaluation of a new nonnvasive device in determining hemoglobin levels in emergency department patients. West J Emerg Med 14 (2011), 283–286.
28. 28 Gayat, E., Bodin, A., Sportiello, C., et al. Performance evaluation of a noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring device. Ann Emerg Med 57 (2011), 330–333.
29. 29 Gayat, E., Aulagnier, J., Matthieu, E., et al. Non-invasive measurement of hemoglobin: Assessment of two different point-of-care technologies. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e30065.
30. 30 Frasca, D., Dahyot-Fizelier, C., Catherine, K., et al. Accuracy of a continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 39 (2011), 2277–2282.
31. 31 Nguyen, B.V., Vincent, J.L., Nowak, E., et al. The accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin measurement by multiwavelength pulse oximetry after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 113 (2011), 1052–1057.
32. 32 Tsuei, B.J., Hanseman, D.J., Blakeman, M.J., et al. Accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring in patients at risk for hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77 (2014), S134–139.
33. 33 Macknet, M.R., Allard, M., Applegate, R.L. 2nd, et al. The accuracy of noninvasive and continuous total hemoglobin measurement by pulse CO-oximetry in human subjects undergoing hemodilution. Anesth Analg 111 (2010), 1424–1426.
34. 34 Naftalovich, R., Naftalovich, D., Error in noninvasive spectrophotometric measurement of blood hemoglobin concentration under conditions of blood loss. Med Hypotheses 77 (2011), 665–667.
35. 35 Crowley, C., Montenegro-Bethancourt, G., Solomons, N.W., et al. Validity and correspondence of non-invasively determined hemoglobin concentrations by two trans-cutaneous digital measuring devices. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 21 (2012), 191–200.
36. 36 Giraud, B., Frasca, D., Debaene, B., et al. Comparison of haemoglobin measurement methods in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth 111 (2013), 946–954.
37. 37 Isosu, T., Obara, S., Hosono, A., et al. Validation of continuous and noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring by pulse CO-oximetry in Japanese surgical patients. J Clin Monit Comput 27 (2013), 55–60.
38. 38 Belardinelli, A., Benni, M., Tazzari, P.L., et al. Noninvasive methods for haemoglobin screening in prospective blood donors. Vox Sang 105 (2013), 116–120.
39. 39 Shah, N., Osea, E.A., Martinez, G.J., Accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin and invasive point-of-care hemoglobin testing compared with a laboratory analyzer. Int J Lab Hematol 36 (2014), 56–61.
40. 40 Marques, N.R., Kramer, G.C., Voigt, R.B., et al. Trending, accuracy, and precision of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring during human hemorrhage and fixed crystalloid bolus. Shock 44:Suppl 1 (2015), 45–49.
41. 41 Pologe, J.A., Menschik, M., Statistical assessment of the clinical performance of the Masimo Radical-7. author reply 811-812 Am J Surg, 204, 2012, 810.
42. 42 Butwick, A., Hilton, G., Carvalho, B., Non-invasive haemoglobin measurement in patients undergoing elective Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 108 (2012), 271–277.
43. 43 Connelly, N.R., Magee, M., Kiessling, B., The use of the iSTAT portable analyzer in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Clin Monit 12 (1996), 311–315.
44. 44 Hopfer, S.M., Nadeau, F.L., Sundra, M., et al. Effect of protein on hemoglobin and hematocrit assays with a conductivity-based point-of-care testing device: Comparison with optical methods. Ann Clin Lab Sci 34 (2004), 75–82.
45. 45 Wu, P., Morey, T.E., Harris, N.S., et al. Intravenous fluids cause systemic bias in a conductivity-based point-of-care hematocrit meter. Anesth Analg 114 (2012), 314–321.