Hemodynamics-driven deposition of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  Di Achille, P ^a   Tellides, G ^b   Humphrey, J D ^a,b  

^a Yale University   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

aneurysm; computational fluid dynamics; optimization; shear stress; thrombus

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DEPOSITION; MEDICAL IMAGING; OPTIMIZATION; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; SHEAR STRESS;

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS; ANEURYSM; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; GROWTH AND REMODELING; INTRALUMINAL THROMBUS; PHENOMENOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION; THROMBUS; THROMBUS INITIATION;

BLOOD VESSELS;

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPLICATION; DISEASE EXACERBATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; PATHOLOGY; THROMBOSIS;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; THROMBOSIS;

EID: 84990913987     PISSN: 20407939     EISSN: 20407947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2828     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Vorp DA, Lee PC, Wang DHJ, et al. Association of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm with local hypoxia and wall weakening. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2001;34(2):291–299. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.114813
2. Wang DHJ, Makaroun MS, Webster MW, Vorp DA. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2002;36(3):598–604. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.126087
3. Wilson JS, Virag L, Di Achille P, Karšaj I, Humphrey JD. Biochemomechanics of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2013;135(2):021011–021011. doi: 10.1115/1.4023437
4. Di Achille P, Tellides G, Figueroa CA, Humphrey JD. A haemodynamic predictor of intraluminal thrombus formation in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science. 2014;470(2172): 20140163. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2014.0163
5. Virag L, Wilson JS, Humphrey JD, Karšaj I. A computational model of biochemomechanical effects of intraluminal thrombus on the enlargement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2015;43(12):2852–2867. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1354-z
6. Humphrey JD, Taylor CA. Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2008;10(1):221–246. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160439
7. Wilson N, Wang K, Dutton RW, Taylor C. A software framework for creating patient specific geometric models from medical imaging data for simulation based medical planning of vascular surgery. In: Niessen WJ, Viergever MA, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2001. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin; 2001:449–456.
8. Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A, Steinman DA. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 2008;46(11):1097–1112. doi: 10.1007/s11517-008-0420-1
9. Brooks AN, Hughes TJR. Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 1982;32(1-3):199–259. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(82)90071-8
10. Taylor CA, Hughes TJR, Zarins CK. Finite element modeling of blood flow in arteries. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 1998;158(1-2):155–196. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)80008-X
11. Jansen KE, Whiting CH, Hulbert GM. A generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2000;190(3-4):305–319. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00203-6
12. Hughes TJR. The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications; 2000.
13. Figueroa CA, Vignon-Clementel IE, Jansen KE, Hughes TJR, Taylor CA. A coupled momentum method for modeling blood flow in three-dimensional deformable arteries. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2006;195(41-43):5685–5706. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.11.011
14. Les A, Yeung J, Schultz G, Herfkens R, Dalman R, Taylor C. Supraceliac and infrarenal aortic flow in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: mean flows, waveforms, and allometric scaling relationships. Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology. 2010;1(1):39–51. doi: 10.1007/s13239-010-0004-8
15. Vignon-Clementel IE, Alberto Figueroa C, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2006;195(29-32):3776–3796. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.04.014
16. Xiao N, Humphrey JD, Figueroa CA. Multi-scale computational model of three-dimensional hemodynamics within a deformable full-body arterial network. Journal of Computational Physics. 2013;244:22–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.09.016
17. Bazilevs Y, Gohean JR, Hughes TJR, Moser RD, Zhang Y. Patient-specific isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2009;198(45-46):3534–3550. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.04.015
18. Moghadam ME, Bazilevs Y, Hsia T-Y, Vignon-Clementel IE, Marsden AL. (mocha) M of CHA. A comparison of outlet boundary treatments for prevention of backflow divergence with relevance to blood flow simulations. Computational Mechanics. 2011;48(3):277–291. doi: 10.1007/s00466-011-0599-0
19. Chiu JJ, Chien S. Effects of disturbed flow on vascular endothelium: pathophysiological basis and clinical perspectives. Physiological Reviews. 2011;91(1):327–387. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00047.2009
20. Shadden SC, Taylor CA. Characterization of coherent structures in the cardiovascular system. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2008;36(7):1152–1162. doi: 10.1007/s10439-008-9502-3
21. Suh G-Y, Les A, Tenforde A, et al. Quantification of particle residence time in abdominal aortic aneurysms using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2011;39(2):864–883. doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-0202-4
22. Basciano C, Kleinstreuer C, Hyun S, Finol E. A relation between near-wall particle-hemodynamics and onset of thrombus formation in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2011;39(7):2010–2026. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0285-6
23. Arzani A, Shadden SC. Characterization of the transport topology in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm models. Physics of Fluids. 2012;24(8) 81901-81901–16. doi: 10.1063/1.4744984
24. Shadden SC, Hendabadi S. Potential fluid mechanic pathways of platelet activation. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2013;12(3):467–474. doi: 10.1007/s10237-012-0417-4
25. Himburg HA, Grzybowski DM, Hazel AL, LaMack JA, Li X-M, Friedman MH. Spatial comparison between wall shear stress measures and porcine arterial endothelial permeability. American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2004;286(5):H1916–H1922. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00897.2003
26. Lee SW, Antiga L, Steinman DA. Correlations among indicators of disturbed flow at the normal carotid bifurcation. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2009;131(6):61013. doi: 10.1115/1.3127252
27. The HDF Group. Hierarchical data format, version 5, 1997-2016.
28. Neeves KB, Illing DAR, Diamond SL. Thrombin flux and wall shear rate regulate fibrin fiber deposition state during polymerization under flow. Biophysical Journal. 2010;98(7):1344–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4275
29. Weisel JW, Litvinov RI. Mechanisms of fibrin polymerization and clinical implications. Blood. 2013;121(10):1712–1719. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-306639
30. Wolberg AS. Determinants of fibrin formation, structure, and function. Current Opinion in Hematology. 2012;19(5):349–356. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32835673c2
31. Larsson U, Blombäck B, Rigler R, et al. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology. 1987;915(2):172–179. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(87)90297-4
32. Logg A, K-A M, Wells G (Eds). Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012.
33. Alnæs M, Blechta J, Hake J, et al. The FEniCS Project version 1.5. Archive of Numerical Software. 2015;3(100). doi: 10.11588/ans.2015.100.20553
34. O'Rourke MJ, McCullough JP, Kelly S. An investigation of the relationship between hemodynamics and thrombus deposition within patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2012;226(7):548–564. doi: 10.1177/0954411912444080
35. Arzani A, Suh G-Y, Dalman RL, Shadden SC. A longitudinal comparison of hemodynamics and intraluminal thrombus deposition in abdominal aortic aneurysms. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2014; ajpheart.00461.2014. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00461.2014
36. Zambrano BA, Gharahi H, Lim C, et al. Association of intraluminal thrombus, hemodynamic forces, and abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion using longitudinal CT images. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2015;1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1461-x
37. Morris AM, Allen CB, Rendall TCS. CFD-based optimization of aerofoils using radial basis functions for domain element parameterization and mesh deformation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 2008;58(8):827–860. doi: 10.1002/fld.1769
38. Manzoni A, Quarteroni A, Rozza G. Model reduction techniques for fast blood flow simulation in parametrized geometries. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering. 2012;28(6-7):604–625. doi: 10.1002/cnm.1465
39. Carr JC, Beatson RK, Cherrie JB, et al. Reconstruction and representation of 3D objects with radial basis functions. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2001; 67-76. doi: 10.1145/383259.383266
40. Hansen KB, Shadden SC. A reduced-dimensional model for near-wall transport in cardiovascular flows. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2015;1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0719-4
41. Furie B, Furie BC. Thrombus formation in vivo. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;115(12):3355–3362. doi: 10.1172/JCI26987
42. Wall WA, Ramm E. Fluid-structure interaction based upon a stabilized (ALE) finite element method. In: Idelsohn SR, Oñate E, Dvorkin EN, eds. Computational Mechanics—New Trends and Applications. Barcelona, Spain: CIMNE; 1998:1–20.
43. Donea J, Huerta A. Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2003.
44. Fernández MA, Gerbeau J-F, Smaldone S. Explicit coupling schemes for a fluid-fluid interaction problem arising in hemodynamics. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 2014.
45. Marsden AL. Optimization in cardiovascular modeling. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 2014;46(1):519–546. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141341
46. Long CC, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y. Shape optimization of pulsatile ventricular assist devices using FSI to minimize thrombotic risk. Computational Mechanics. 2014;54(4):921–932. doi: 10.1007/s00466-013-0967-z
47. Abramson M, Audet C, Dennis J, Digabel S. OrthoMADS: a deterministic MADS instance with orthogonal directions. SIAM Journal on Optimization. 2009;20(2):948–966. doi: 10.1137/080716980
48. Booker AJ, Jr JED, Frank PD, Serafini DB, Torczon V, Trosset MW. A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. Structural optimization. 1999;17(1):1–13. doi: 10.1007/BF01197708
49. Marsden AL, Feinstein JA, Taylor CA. A computational framework for derivative-free optimization of cardiovascular geometries. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2008;197(21-24):1890–1905. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2007.12.009
50. Arzani A, Shadden SC. Characterizations and correlations of wall shear stress in aneurysmal flow. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2016;138(1):14503
51. Colace TV, Tormoen GW, McCarty OJT, Diamond SL. Microfluidics and coagulation biology. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2013;15(1):283–303. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152406
52. Runyon MK, Kastrup CJ, Johnson-Kerner BL, Van Ha TG, Ismagilov RF. Effects of shear rate on propagation of blood clotting determined using microfluidics and numerical simulations. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130(11):3458–3464. doi: 10.1021/ja076301r
53. Shen F, Kastrup CJ, Liu Y, Ismagilov RF. Threshold response of initiation of blood coagulation by tissue factor in patterned microfluidic capillaries is controlled by shear rate. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28(11):2035–2041. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.173930
54. Labruto F, Blomqvist L, Swedenborg J. Imaging the intraluminal thrombus of abdominal aortic aneurysms: techniques, findings, and clinical implications. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2011;22(8):1069–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.01.454
55. Wilson JS, Baek S, Humphrey JD. Importance of initial aortic properties on the evolving regional anisotropy, stiffness and wall thickness of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface / the Royal Society. 2012;9(74):2047–2058. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0097