Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 26, Issue 13, 2016, Pages 1802-1811

  Birt, Linda ^a,b   Scott, Suzanne ^c   Cavers, Debbie ^d   Campbell, Christine ^d   Walter, Fiona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

credibility; melanoma; member checking; participant validation; qualitative method; respondent validation; trustworthiness; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990855444     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732316654870     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barbour R. S., (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 233, 1115-1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
2. Bergold J., Thomas S., (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13 (1), 1-35.
3. Birt L., (2010). Caring and working: A hermeneutic phenomenology study exploring the experiences of working-age male family carers (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/34305/1/2010BirtLPhD.pdf
4. Blaikie N., (2007). Approaches to social enquiry (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
5. Buus N., Agdal R., (2013). Can the use of reporting guidelines in peer-review damage the quality and contribution of qualitative health care research? International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 1289-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.02.012
6. Carlson J. A., (2010). Avoiding traps in member checking. The Qualitative Report, 15, 1102-1113.
7. Charmaz K., (2008). Grounded theory. In Smith J. A., (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 81-110). London: Sage.
8. Cho J., Trent A., (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research, 6, 319-340. doi: 10.1177/1468794106065006
9. Crotty M., (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
10. Dickenson-Swift V., James E. L., Kippen S., Liamputtong P., (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research, 7, 327-353.
11. Doyle S., (2007). Member checking with older women: A framework for negotiating meaning. Health Care for Women International, 8, 888-908.
12. Equator Network. (2013). Guidelines for reporting health research. Retrieved from http://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Reporting-guidelines-in-journals-August-2013.pdf
13. Estroff S. E., (1995). Whose story is it anyway? Authority, voice and responsibility in narratives of chronic illness. In Toombs S. K., Barnard D., Carson R. A., (Eds.), Chronic illness: From experience to policy (pp. 77-104). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14. Forbat L., Henderson J., (2005). Theoretical and practical reflections on sharing transcripts with participants. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1114-1128.
15. Fossey E., Harvey C., McDermott F., Davidson L., (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 717-732.
16. Gadamer H., (1996). Truth and method (Barden G., Cumming J., Trans.). London: Sheed & Ward. (Original work published 1975)
17. Gale N. K., Heath G., Cameron E., Rashid S., Redwood S., (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 117-124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
18. Gray D. E., (2013). Doing research in the real world. London: Sage.
19. Grbich C., (2006). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. London: Sage.
20. Guba E. G., Lincoln Y. S., (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Guba E. G., Lincoln Y. S., (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Hammersley M., (1992). What's wrong with ethnography? New York: Routledge.
23. Harper M., Cole P., (2012). Member checking: Can benefits be gained similar to group therapy. The Qualitative Report, 17, 510-517.
24. Harvey L., (2015). Beyond member-checking: A dialogic approach to the research interview. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38, 23-38.
25. Hesse-Biber S., (2010). Qualitative approaches to mixed methods practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 455-468. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364611
26. Klinger L., (2005). Occupational adaptation: Perspectives of people with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Occupational Science, 12, 9-16.
27. Koelsch L. E., (2013). Reconceptualizing the member check interview. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 168-179.
28. Koro-Ljungberg M., MacLure M., (2013). Provocations, re-un-visions, death, and other possibilities of "data." Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13, 219-222. doi: 10.1177/1532708613487861
29. Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G., (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Mason J., (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
31. Miles M. B., Huberman M., (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Mills K., Emery J., Cheung C., Hall N., Birt L., Walter F. M., (2014). A qualitative exploration of the use of calendar landmarking instruments in cancer symptom research. BMC Family Practice, 15, 167-175. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0167-8
33. Morse J. M., (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 1212-1222. doi: 10.1177/1049732315588501
34. Murphy E., Dingwell R., Greatbatch D., Parker S., Watson S., (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment, 2 (16), 1-276.
35. Rolfe G., (2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 304-310.
36. Sandelowski M., (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advances in Nursing Science, 16 (2), 1-8.
37. Scott S. E., Birt L., Cavers D., Shah N., Campbell C., Walter F. M., (2015). Patient drawings of their melanoma: A novel approach to understanding symptom perception and appraisal prior to health care. Psychology & Health, 30, 1035-1048. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2015.1016943
38. Snape D., Spencer L., (2003). The foundations of qualitative research. In Ritchie J., Lewis J., (Eds.), Research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 1-23). London: Sage.
39. Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J., (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349-357.
40. Torrance H., (2012). Triangulation, respondent validation, and democratic participation in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6, 111-123. doi: 10.1177/1558689812437185
41. Walter F. M., Birt L., Cavers D., Scott S., Emery J., Burrows N., Campbell C., (2014). "This isn't what mine looked like": A qualitative study of symptom appraisal and help seeking in people recently diagnosed with melanoma. BMJ Open, 4 (7), 1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005566