Exploring ethical dilemmas using the “drifting goals” archetype

Journal of Management Education

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 134-148

  Bardoel, E Anne ^a   Haslett, Tim ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

drifting goals; ethical dilemmas; management education; system archetypes; systems thinking tools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990385250     PISSN: 10525629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1052562905280836     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson, V., & Johnson, L. (1997). Systems thinking basics: From concepts to causal loops. Cambridge, MA: Pegasus Communications.
2. Aronson, D. (1998). Overview of systems thinking. Thinking Page. Available at www.thinking.net
3. Bardoel, E. A., & Haslett, T. (2004). Success to the successful: The use of systems thinking tools in teaching OB. Organization Management Journal, 1(2), 1-12.
4. Carver, C., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Scaling back goals and recalibration of the affect system are processes in normal adaptive self-regulation: Understanding “response shift” phenomena. Social Science and Medicine, 50(12), 1715-1722.
5. Christie, P. M. J., Kwon, I-W. G., Stoeberl, P. A., & Baumhart, R. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ethical attitudes of business managers: India, Korea and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 263-287.
6. Daft, R. (2003). Management (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western (division of Thomson Learning).
7. Daft, R. L., & Noe, R. A. (2001). Organizational behavior. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing (division of Thomson Learning).
8. Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking and soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10(2/3), 245-256.
9. Goekler, J. (2003). Teaching for the future: Systems thinking and sustainability. Green Teacher, 70, 8-14.
10. Haslett, T. (2001). Experiences and reflections on the transition from classroom to practice. Systems Dynamics Review, 17(2), 161-170.
11. Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. W. (2004). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson (South-Western).
12. Hirsch, G. C., & Immediato, S. (1999). Microworlds and generic structures as resources for integrating care and improving health. System Dynamics Review, 15(3), 315-330.
13. Kim, D. H. (1990). A palette of systems thinking tools. Systems Thinker, 1(3), 3-4.
14. Kim, D. H. (1992). Toolbox reprint series: Systems archetypes 1. Cambridge, MA: Pegasus Communications.
15. King, J., & Acklin, D. (1995). Creating common ground: A lesson from the past. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(1), 1-16.
16. Lane, D., & Smart, C. (1996). Reinterpreting“genericstructure”: Evolution, application and limitations of a concept. System Dynamics Review, 12, 87-120.
17. Luthans, F. (2002). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the limits: Confronting global collapse, envisioning a sustainable future. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
19. Morris, S. A., & McDonald, R. A. (1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 715-726.
20. Robbins, S. P., Millett, B., & Waters-Marsh, T. (2004). Organisational behaviour. Frenchs Forest, New South Wales: Pearson Education Australia.
21. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Milsons Point, New South Wales: Random House Australia.
22. Senge, P. M., Ross, R., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., & Smith, B. (1994). The fifth discipline field book. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
23. Thornton, B., Peltier, G., & Perreault, G. (2004). Systems thinking: A skill to improve student achievement. Clearing House, 77(5), 222-227.
24. Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1/2), 33-42.
25. Wolstenholme, E. F. (2003). Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 19(1), 7-26.
26. Wrosch, C., Scheier, M., Miller, G., Schulz, R., & Carver, C. (2003). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subject well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1494-1512.