Aligning what we do and what we measure in business schools: Incorporating active learning and effective media use in the assessment of instruction

Journal of Management Education

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 19-38

  Serva, Mark A ^a   Fuller, Mark A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

active learning; learning theory; media use; teaching evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990350878     PISSN: 10525629     EISSN: 15526658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1052562903252648     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abrami, P., d’Apollonia, S., & Cohen, P. (1990). Validity of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 219-231.
2. Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 18, 159-174.
3. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning—a call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12, 1-10.
4. Alavi, M., Yoo, Y., & Vogel, D. (1997). Using information technology to add value to management education. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1310-1333.
5. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. (1991). Report no. Ashe-ERIC higher education report 1. Washington,DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.
6. Bowerman, B. L., & O’Connell, R. T. (1997). Applied statistics: Improving business processes. Chicago: Irwin.
7. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
8. Carkenord, D. M., & Stephens, M. G. (1994). Understanding student judgments of teaching effectiveness: A “policy capturing” approach. Journal of Psychology, 128, 675-682.
9. Centra, J. A. (1973). Effectiveness of student feedback in modifying college instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 395-401.
10. Centra, J. A. (1998). Development of the student instructional report II. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
11. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3-7.
12. Coppola, J. F. (2000). A model for e-classroom design beyond “chalk and talk.” T H E Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 27, 30-30.
13. Cytron,S. (1998).Leadingtheclass intothe21stcentury. Journal of Accountancy, 185, 56-58.
14. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
15. Daly, W. T. (1994). Teaching and scholarship: Adapting American higher education to hard times. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 45-57.
16. Darling-Hammond,L. (1994).Performance assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 5-29.
17. Dennis, A., & Valacich, J. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1017. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
18. Densford, L. E. (1997, September-October). Call it the airline with an attitude. Corporate University Review: The Magazine About Organizational Learning and Performance. Retrieved from www.traininguniversity.com/tu_pi1997so_7.php
19. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121-147.
20. Faust, J. L., & Paulson, D. R. (1998). Active learning in the college classroom. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 9, 3-24.
21. Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 107-123). New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Grussing, P. G., Valuck, R. J., & Williams, R. G. (1994). Development and validation of behaviorally anchored rating scales for student evaluation of pharmacy instruction. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 58, 25-37.
23. Hawkins, J. (1993).Technologyand the organization of schooling. Communicationsof the ACM, 36, 30-35.
24. Hsu, S., Marques, O., Hamza, M. K., & Alhalabi, B. (1999). How to design a virtual classroom: 10 easy steps to follow. T H E Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 27, 96-96.
25. Huitt, B. (1997). The cognitive system. Retrieved August 13, 2002, from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/cogsys/cogsys.html
26. Jaramillo, J. A. (1996). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and contributions to the development of constructivist curricula. Education, 117, 133-140.
27. Kaiser, H. (1960).The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational& Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
28. Kelvin, L. (1891, May 3). Lecture to the institution of civil engineers, May 3, 1883. Popular lectures and addresses (Vol. 1, p. 80-80). London & New York: Macmillan.
29. Kember, D., & McKay, J. (1996). Action research into the quality of student learning: A paradigm for faculty development. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 528-554.
30. Leidner, D., & Fuller, M. (1997). Improving student processing and assimilation of conceptual information: GSS supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning. Decision Support Systems, 20, 149-163.
31. Leidner, D., & Jarvenpaa, S. (1993). The information age confronts education: Case studies on electronic classrooms. Information Systems Research, 4, 24-54.
32. Leidner, D., & Jarvenpaa, S. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, 19, 265-291.
33. McGrath, B. (1998). Partners in learning: Twelve ways technology changes the teacher-student relationship. T H E Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 25, 58-61.
34. Merriam-Webster Online. (2002). Definition of “media,” Retrieved August 13, 2002, from www.merriam-webster.com
35. Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Mills, J. (1998). Better teaching through provocation. College Teaching, 46, 21-25.
37. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
38. Olsen, D. G. (1999).Constructivist principles of learning and teaching methods. Education, 120, 347-347.
39. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-1.
40. Rao, H., Greve, H. R., & Davis, G. F. (2001). Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 502-531.
41. Rice, M., & Wilson, E. (1999). How technology aids constructivism in the social studies classroom. Social Studies, 90, 28-33.
42. Roebuck, D. B. (1998). Using team learning in business and organizational communication classes. Business Communication Quarterly, 61, 35-49.
43. Rubin, L., & Hebert, C. (1998). Model for active learning: Collaborative peer teaching. College Teaching, 46, 26-30.
44. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86-97.
45. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46. von Glaserfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer.
47. Watson, J. B. (1994). Reprint of psychology as the behavioralist views it. Psychological Review, 101, 248-253.
48. Wotruba, T. R., & Wright, P. L. (1975). How to develop a teach-rating instrument. Journal of Higher Education, 47, 653-663.
49. Young, S., & Shaw, D. G. (1999). Profile of effective college and university teachers. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 670-670.
50. Zmud, R. W., & Carlson, J. R. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153-153.