Communicating change to nonprofit stakeholders: Models and Predictors of Implementers’ Approaches

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 5-41

  Hamel, Stephanie A ^b   Richardson, Brian K ^b  

^a University of Texas ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990348186     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318901151001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Anthony, R. N., & Herzlinger, R. E. (1975). Management control in nonprofit organizations. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
3. Bartunek, J. M. (1988). Dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 137-162). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
4. Carr, R. (2000, October 15). The power of nonprofits. Austin American-Statesman, pp. A1-A1, A12-A13.
5. Cheney, G., & Christensen, L. T. (2001). Identity at issue: Linkages between ‘internal’ and ‘external’ organizational communication. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), New handbook of organizational communication (pp. 231-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Cheney, G., & Frenette, G. (1993). Persuasion and organization: Values, logics, and accounts in contemporary corporate public discourse. In C. Conrad (Ed.), The ethical nexus (pp. 49-73). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
8. Deetz, S. (1979). Social well-being and the development of an appropriate organizational response to de-institutionalization and legitimation crisis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 7, 45-54.
9. Deetz, S., & Kersten, A. (1983). Critical models of interpretive research. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 55-71). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. DeLuca, J. R. (1984). Managing the socio-political context in planned change efforts. In A. Kakabadse & C. Parker (Eds.), Power, politics, and organizations: A behavioral science view (pp. 127-147). New York: John Wiley.
11. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Nonprofit managers in different fields of service: Managerial tasks and management training. In M. O’Neill & D. R. Young (Eds.), Educating managers of nonprofit organizations (pp. 51-69). New York: Praeger.
12. Eadie, D. C. (1997). Changing by design: A practical approach to leading innovation in nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Fairhurst, G. T. (1993). Echoes of the vision: When the rest of the organization talks total quality. Management Communication Quarterly, 6, 331-371.
14. Fisher, B. A., & Ellis, D. G. (1990). Small group decision making: Communication and the group process (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1995). The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 541-570.
16. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
17. Frost, P. J., & Egri, C. P. (1991). The political process of innovation. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 13, pp. 229-295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18. Hall, P. D. (1987). A historical overview of the private nonprofit sector. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 3-26). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Heath, R. L. (1994). Management of corporate communication: From interpersonal contacts to external affairs. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Howard, G. S. (1994). Why do people say such nasty things about self-reports? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 399-404.
21. Howard, G. S., Maxwell, S. E., Wiener, R. L., Boynton, K. S., & Rooney, W. M. (1980). Is a behavioral measure the best estimate of behavioral parameters? Perhaps not. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 293-311.
22. Kanter, R. M., & Summers, D. V. (1987). Doing well while doing good: Dilemmas of performance measurement in nonprofit organizations and the need for a multiple-constituency approach. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 154-166). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Lewis, L. K. (1999). Disseminating information and soliciting input during planned organizational change: Implementers’ targets, sources, and channels for communicating. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 43-75.
24. Lewis, L. K., Hamel, S., & Richardson, B. (2000, June). Strategic communication with nonprofit organization stakeholders during planned change. Paper presented to the Organizational Communication Division at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico.
25. Lewis, L. K., & Seibold, D. R. (1993). Innovation modification during intraorganizational adoption. Academy of Management Review, 18, 322-354.
26. Lewis, L. K., & Seibold, D. R. (1998). Reconceptualizing organizational change implementation as a communication problem: A review of literature and research agenda. Communication Yearbook, 21, 93-151.
27. Mason, D. E. (1984). Voluntary nonprofit enterprise management. New York: Plenum.
28. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
29. Mumby, D. K. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: Discourse, ideology, and domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30. Mumby, D. K., & Stohl, C. (1996). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 50-72.
31. Nutt, P. C. (1986). Tactics of implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 230-261.
32. Nutt, P. C. (1987). Identifying and appraising how managers install strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 1-14.
33. O’Neill, M., & Young, D. R. (1988). Educating managers of nonprofit organizations. In M. O’Neill & D. R. Young (Eds.), Educating managers of nonprofit organizations (pp. 1-21). New York: Praeger.
34. Papa, M. J., & Papa, W. H. (1990). Perceptual and communicative indices of employee performance with new technology. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 21-41.
35. Putnam, L. L. (1989). Negotiation and organizing: Two levels of analysis within the Weickian model. Communication Studies, 40, 249-257.
36. Putnam, L. L., & Cheney, G. (1985). Organizational communication: Historical development and future directions. In T. W. Benson (Ed.), Speech communication in the 20th century (pp. 130-156). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
37. Reger, R. K., Gustafson, L. T., Demarie, S. M., & Mullane, J. V. (1994). Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Academy of Management Review, 19, 565-584.
38. Rowley, T. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.
39. Rudney, G. (1987). The scope and dimensions of nonprofit activity. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 55-64). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1994). The emerging sector: An overview. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Institute for Policy Studies.
41. Schein, V. E. (1985). Organizational realities: The politics of change. In D. D. Warrick (Ed.), Contemporary organization development: Current thinking and applications (pp. 87-97). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
42. Tornatzky, L. G., & Johnson, E. C. (1982). Research on implementation: Implications for evaluation practice and evaluation policy. Evaluation and Program Planning, 5, 193-198.
43. Zorn, T. E., Page, D. J., & Cheney, G. (2000). Nuts about change: Multiple perspectives on change-oriented communication in a public sector organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 515-566.