Interdisciplinary, team-taught, undergraduate business courses: The impact of integration

Journal of Management Education

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 276-294

  Ducoffe, Sandra J Smith ^a   Tromley, Cheryl L ^a   Tucker, Michael ^a  

^a FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

integration; interdisciplinary; pedagogy; team teaching; under graduate

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990338729     PISSN: 10525629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1052562905284663     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alreck, P. L., & Settle, R. B. (1995). The survey research handbook. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.
2. American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business. (2002a). Management education at risk: A report from the Management Education Task Force, executive summary, August, 2002. Retrieved April 10, 2003, from www.aacsb.edu/publications/metf/METFReport-ExecutiveSummary.pdf
3. American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business. (2002b). Management education at risk: A report from the Management Education Task Force, final report, August, 2002. Retrieved April 10, 2003, from www.aacsb.edu/publications/metf/METFReportFinal-August02.pdf
4. Armstrong, F. (1980). Faculty development through interdisciplinarity. Journal of General Education, 32(1), 52-63.
5. Badgett, K. L., Hill, P. L., Mills, W. H., Mitchell, S. P., Vinson III, G. S., & Wilkins, K. L. (1994). Team combines technologies to target horizontal wells in Gulf ofMexico oil field. Oil& Gas Journal, 91(11), 44-48.
6. Bakken, L., Clark, F. L., & Thompson, J. (1998). Collaborative teaching: Many joys, some surprises, and a few worms. College Teaching, (Fall), 154-159.
7. Bursic, K. M. (1992). Strategies and benefits of the successful use of teams in manufacturing organizations. IEEE, Transactions on Engineering Management, 39(3), 277-289.
8. Cabello, C. C. (1999). Six stepping stones to better management. Nursing Management, 30(4), 39-40.
9. Davis, J. R. (1995). Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching: New arrangements for learning. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and Oryx Press.
10. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley.
11. George, M. A., & Davis-Wiley, P. (2000). Team teaching a graduate course. College Teaching, 48(2), 75-84.
12. Heimovics, D., Tayor, M., & Stilwell, R. (1996). Assessing and developing a newstrategic direction for the executive MBA. Journal of Management Education, 20(4), 462-478.
13. Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
14. Louwrens, M. (1997). The importance of a common project management method in the corporate environment. R & D Management, 27(3), 189-196.
15. Malhotra, N. (1996). Marketing research: An applied approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. McDaniel, C., & Gates, R. (1999). Contemporary marketing research. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College.
17. McKeage, K., Skinner, D., Seymour, R. M., Donahue, D. W., & Christensen, T. (1999). Implementing an interdisciplinary marketing/engineering course project: Project format, preliminary evaluation, and critical factor review. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(3), 217-231.
18. Miller, J. R. (2000). Economics in the integrated business curriculum. Journal of Education for Business, 76(2), 113-118.
19. Mullins, J. W., & Fukami, C. V. (1996). Stage 4: The raging debates. Journal of Management Education, 20(4), 446-461.
20. Pharr, S. W. (2000). Foundational considerations for establishing an integrated business common core curriculum. Journal of Education for Business, 76(1), 20-26.
21. Sheehan, K. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2). Retrieved January 30, 2006 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu
22. Shwom, B., & Hirsch, P. (1999). Re-envisioning the writing requirement: An interdisciplinary approach. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(1), 104-107.
23. Silver, W., & McGowan, R. P. (1996). Stage 3: Adventures in team teaching. Journal of Management Education, 20(4), 435-445.
24. Slater, J. S., McCubbrey, D. J., & Scudder, R. A. (1995). Inside an integratedMBA: An information system view. MIS Quarterly, 19(3), 391-407.
25. Sorensen, J. E., & Wittmer, D. P. (1996). Stage 2: Designing team-taught transdisciplinary courses—Where do we begin? Journal of Management Education, 20(4), 422-434.
26. Watkins, T. L. (1996). Stage 1: Creating a new MBA core with team teaching. Journal of Management Education, 20(4), 411-421.
27. Wenger, M. S., & Hornyak, M. J. (1999). Team teaching for higher level learning: A framework of professional collaboration. Journal of Management Education, 23(3), 311-327.
28. Young, M. B., & Kram, K. E. (1996). Repairing the disconnects in faculty teaching teams. Journal of Management Education, 20(4), 500-515.
29. Zirger, B. J., & Hartley, J. L. (1996). The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43(2), 143-152.
30. Zolner, J. P. (1996, Winter). Moving the academic graveyard: The dynamics of curricular change. Selections, pp. 1-10.