Social archaeology of housing from a Latin American perspective: A case study

Journal of Social Archaeology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 23-45

  Funari, Pedro Paulo A ^a   Zarankin, Andrés ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

archaeology of architecture; control; social archaeology; South America

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990334205     PISSN: 14696053     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1469605303003001097     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Acuto, F. (1999) ‘Paisaje y Dominación: La Constitución del Espacio Social en el Imperio Inka’, in A. Zarankin and F. Acuto (eds) Sed non Satiata: Teoría Social en la Arqueología Latinoamericana Contemporánea, pp. 33-76. Buenos Aires: Del Tridente.
2. Andrade Lima, T. (1999) ‘El Huevo de la Serpiente: Una Arqueología del Capitalismo Embrionario en el Rio de Janeiro del Siglo XIX’, in A Zarankin and F. Acuto (eds) Sed non Satiata: Teoría Social en la Arqueología Latinoamericana Contemporánea, pp. 189-238. Buenos Aires: Del Tridente.
3. Arbide, D. (1991a) ‘Tipología Arquitectónica La Técnica del Análisis Tipológico: la Casa Cajon’, in D. Arbide (ed.) De Tipos y Tipologías en la Vivienda Popular, pp. 14-25. Concepción del Uruguay: Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo.
4. Arbide, D. (1991b) ‘La Vivienda Popular en Buenos Aires en la Década de 1930’, in D. Arbide (ed.) De Tipos y Tipologías en la Vivienda Popular, pp. 6-9. Concepción del Uruguay: Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo.
5. Arbide, D., R. Arteca and G. Romero, eds (1985) ‘De Tipos y Transformaciones de la Casa Chorizo a la Casa Cajón’, in Documentos de Arquitectura Nacional y Americana, 20: 29-31. Buenos Aires: Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones en Historia de la Arquitectura.
6. Arbide, D., G. Aspiazu and J. Garcia (1991) ‘La Casa Chorizo: Una Tipología para la Ciudad’, in D. Arbide (ed.) De Tipos y Tipologías en la Vivienda Popular, pp. 1-5. Concepción del Uruguay: Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo.
7. Austin, D. and J. Thomas (1986) ‘The “Proper Study” of Medieval Archaeology: A Case Study’, in D. Austin and L. Alcock (eds) From the Baltic to the Black Sea, Studies in Medieval Archaeology, pp. 44-78. London: Unwin Hyman.
8. Bate, L.F. (1998) El Proceso de Investigación en Arqueología. Barcelona: Crítica.
9. Benton, T. and C. Benton (1975) Form and Function. London: Crosby Lockwood Staples.
10. Birdwell-Pheasant, D. and D. Lawrence-Zuñiga (1999) House Life. Space, Place and Family in Europe. Oxford: Berg.
11. Blanton, R. (1994) Houses and Households. New York: Plenum Press.
12. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Bourdieu, P. (1989) O Poder Simbólico. Río de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.
14. De Certeau, M. (1980) La Invención de lo Cotidiano: 1 Artes de Hacer. México: Universidad Iberoamericana.
15. Deetz, J. (1977) In Small Things Forgotten. New York: Anchor Books.
16. Deetz, J. (1988) ‘Material Culture and the Worldwide in Colonial Anglo-America’, in M. Leone and P. Potter (eds) The Recovery of Meaning, pp. 210-233. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.
17. Diez, F. (1986) Buenos Aires y Algunas Constantes en las Transformaciones Urbanas. Buenos Aires: Editorial de la Universidad de Belgrano.
18. Donley-Reid, L. (1990) ‘A Structuring Structure: The Swahili house’, in S. Kent (ed.) Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space. New Directions in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Eco, U. (1968) La Estructura Ausente. Barcelona: Lumen.
20. Fletcher, R. (1989) ‘The Messages of Material Behaviour: A Preliminary Discussion of Non-verbal Meaning’, in I. Hodder (ed.) The Meaning of Things, pp. 33-39. London: HarperCollins.
21. Forrester, V. (1996) El Horror Económico. México: Fondo Económico de Cultura.
22. Forrester, V. (2000) Una Extraña Dictadura. México: Fondo Económico de Cultura.
23. Foucault, M. (1976) Vigilar y Castigar. El Nacimiento de la Prisión. México: Siglo XXI.
24. Fournier, P. (1999) ‘La Arqueología Social Latinoamericana: Caracterización de una Posición Teórica Marxista’, in A. Zarankin and F. Acuto (eds) Sed non satiata. Teoría Social en la Arqueología Latinoamericana Contemporánea, pp. 17-32. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Del Tridente.
25. Frampton, K. (1980) Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames and Hudson.
26. Funari, P. (1991) ‘El Mito Bandeirante: Elite Brasileña, Cultura Material e Indentidad’, Boletín de Antropología Americana 24: 112-121.
27. Funari, P.P.A. (1986) Arqueologia. São Paulo: Ática.
28. Funari, P.P.A. (1993) ‘Memória Histórica e Cultura Material’, Revista Brasileira de História 13(25/26): 17-31.
29. Funari, P.P.A. (1994) ‘Rescuing Ordinary People's Culture: Museums, Material Culture and Education in Brazil’, in P.G. Stone and B.L. Molineaux (eds) The Presented Past: Heritage, Museums and Education, pp. 120-136. London: Routledge.
30. Funari, P.P.A. (1995) ‘Mixed Features of Archaeological Theory in Brazil’, in P.J. Ucko (ed.) Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective, pp. 236-250. London: Routledge.
31. Funari, P.P.A. (1996) ‘Historical Archaeology in Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina’, World Archaeological Bulletin 7: 51-62.
32. Funari, P.P.A. (1997) ‘Archaeology, History, and Historical Archaeology in South América’, International Journal of Historical Archaeology 1(3): 189-206.
33. Funari, P.P.A. (1998) ‘A Herança Medieval do Brasil: Mentalidades, Usos e Costumes Feudais, Resenha de Luis Weckmann, La Herencia Medieval del Brasil’, Locus 6: 137-143.
34. Funari, P.P.A. (1999) ‘Historical Archaeology from a World Perspective’, in P.P.A. Funari, M. Hall and S. Jones (eds) Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge, pp. 37-66. London: Routledge.
35. Funari, P.P.A. (2000) ‘Comment to “A Critical Archaeology Revisited”, by L.A. Wilkie and K. Bartoy’, Current Anthropology 41(5): 764-765.
36. Funari, P.P.A. (2001) ‘Public Archaeology from a Latin American Perspective’, Public Archaeology 1: 239-243.
37. Funari, P.P.A. (2002) ‘Class Interests and Struggle in Brazilian Archaeology’, International Journal of Historical Archaeology (in press).
38. Furlong, G. (1969) El Transplante Social. Buenos Aires: TEA.
39. Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan.
40. Glassie, H. (1975) Folk Housing in Middle Virginia. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
41. Grahame, M. (1995) ‘The House of Pompeii: Space and Social Interaction’, unpublished PhD thesis, Faculty of Arts, Department of Archaeology, Southampton University, UK.
42. Grahame, M. (1997) ‘Public and Private in the Roman House: The Spatial Order of the Casa del Fauno’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 22: 137-164.
43. Hage, P. (1979) ‘Graph Theory as a Structural Model in Cultural Anthropology’, Annual Review of Anthropology 8: 115-136.
44. Hillier, B. and J. Hanson (1984) The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Hingley, R. (1999) ‘The Imperial Context of Romano-British Studies and Proposals for a New Understanding of Social Change’, in P.P.A. Funari, M. Hall and S. Jones (eds) Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge, pp. 137-150. London: Routledge.
46. Hodder, I. (1984) ‘Burials, Houses, Women and Men in the European Neolithic’, in D. Miller and C. Tilley (eds) Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Hodder, I. (1987) The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings. New Directions in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Hodder, I. (1994) ‘Architecture and Meaning: The Example of Neolithic Houses and Tombs’, in M. Parker Pearson and C. Richards (eds) Architecture and Order: Approaches to Social Space, pp. 73-86. London: Routledge.
49. Iglesia, R. (1991) Identidad Cultural y Construcción del Habitat: Orientándose en el Laberinto. Buenos Aires.
50. Johnson, M. (1991) ‘The Englishman's Home and its Study’, in R. Samson (ed.) The Social Archaeology of Houses. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
51. Johnson, M. (1993) Housing Culture: Traditional Houses in an English Landscape. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.
52. Johnson, M. (1994) ‘Ordering Houses, Creating Narratives’, in M. Parker Pearson and C. Richards (eds) Architecture and Order, pp. 170-177. London: Routledge.
53. Johnson, M. (1996) An Archaeology of Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Kent, S. (1990) Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space. New Directions in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Lawrence, R. (1990) ‘Public Collective and Private Spaces: A Study of Urban Housing in Switzerland’, in S. Kent (ed.) Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space, pp. 73-91. New Directions in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Lecuona, D. (1979) ‘Vivienda Poscolonial’, Documentos de Arquitectura Nacional y Americana 8: 44-51.
57. Leone, M. (1977) ‘The New Mormon Temple in Washington D.C.’, in L. Ferguson (ed.) Historical Archaeology and the Importance of Material Things, Special Publication Series (2): 43-61. Tucson, AZ: Society for Historical Archaeology.
58. Leone, M. (1984) ‘Interpreting Ideology in Historical Archaeology: The William Paca Garden in Annapolis, Maryland’, in D. Miller and C. Tilley (eds) Ideology, Power and Prehistory, pp. 25-35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Leone, M.P. (1986) ‘Symbolic, Structural and Critical Archaeology’, in D.J. Meltzer, D.D. Fowler and J.A. Sabloff (eds) American Archaeology, Past and Future, pp. 415-438. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.
60. Maestri, M. (2001) O Sobrado e o Cativo. A Arquitetura Urbana Erudita no Brasil Escravista. O Caso Gaúcho. Passo Fundo: Universidade do Passo Fundo.
61. Markus, T. (1993) Buildings and Power: Freedom and Control in the Origin of Modern Buildings Types. Oxford: Blackwell.
62. Marx, K. (1847/1976) The German Ideology. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
63. Marx, K. (1867/1976) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
64. McGuire, R. and R. Paynter (1991) The Archaeology of Inequality. Oxford: Blackwell.
65. McGuire, R. and M. Schiffer (1983) ‘A Theory of Architectural Design’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2: 277-303.
66. Meskell, L., C. Gosden, I. Hodder, (2001) ‘Editorial statement’, Journal of Social Archaeology 1(1): 5-12.
67. Miller, D. (1984) ‘Modernism and Suburbia as Material Ideology’, in D. Miller and C. Tilley (eds) Ideology, Power and Prehistory, pp. 37-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Miller, D. and C. Tilley (1996) ‘Editorial’, Journal of Material Culture 1: 5-14.
69. Monks, G. (1992) ‘Architectual Symbolism and Non-verbal Communication at Upper Fort Garry’, Historical Archaeology 26(2): 37-57.
70. Moreno, C., ed. (1997) ‘La Vivienda Familiar’, in El Diario Intimo del País. Buenos Aires: La Nación.
71. Nadal Mora, V. (1951) Estetica de la Arquitectura Colonial y Poscolonial Argentina. Buenos Aires: El Ateneo.
72. Nielsen, A. (1995) ‘Architectural Performance and Social Reproduction of Power’, in J. Skibo, W. Walker and A. Nielsen (eds) Expanding Archaeology. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
73. Nuttgens, P. (1983) Historia de la Arquitectura. Madrid: Ediciones Destino.
74. Orser, C.E., Jr (1996) A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World. New York: Plenum Press.
75. Orser, C.E., Jr and Pedro Paulo A. Funari (2001) ‘Archaeology and Slave Resistance and Rebellion’, World Archaeology 33: 61-72.
76. Parker Pearson, M. and C. Richards (1994) Architecture and Order: Approaches to Social Space. London: Routledge.
77. Paynter, R. and R. McGuire (1991) ‘The Archaeology of Inequality: Material Culture, Domination, and Resistance’, in R. Paynter and R. McGuire (eds) The Archaeology of Inequality, pp. 1-27. Oxford: Blackwell.
78. Penrose, J. (1992) ‘Essential Constructions? The “Cultural Bases” of Nationalist Movements’, Nations and Nationalism 1: 391-417.
79. Podgorny, I. (1999) Arqueología de la Educación. Textos, Indicios, Monumentos. Buenos Aires: Asociación Argentina de Antropología.
80. Politis, G. (1995) ‘The Socio-politics of the Development of Archaeology in Hispanic South America’, in P.J. Ucko (ed.) Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective, pp. 197-235. London: Routledge.
81. Politis, G. (2001) ‘On Archaeological Praxis, Gender Bias and Indigenous Peoples in South America’, Journal of Social Archaeology 1(1): 90-107.
82. Rapoport, A. (1969) House Form and Culture. London: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
83. Rapoport, A. (1982) The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
84. Rapoport, A. (1990a) ‘Systems of Activities and Systems of Settings’, in S. Kent (ed.) Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space, pp. 9-20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Rapoport, A. (1990b) History and Precedent in Enviroment Design. New York: Plenum Press.
86. Samson, R., ed. (1990) The Social Archaeology of Houses. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
87. Recent Research in the Archaeology of Architecture: Beyond the Foundations
88. Stedman, S. (1996) ‘Recent Research in the Archaeology of Architecture: Beyond the Foundations’, Journal of Archaeological Research 4(1): 51-93.
89. Tarragó, M. (1987) ‘Sociedad y Sistema de Asentamiento en Yocavil’, Cuadernos del Instituto Nacional de Antropología 12: 179-196.
90. Tilley, C. (1989) ‘Interpreting Material Culture’, in I. Hodder (ed.) The Meaning of Things, pp. 185-194. London: HarperCollins.
91. Torre Revello, J. (1928) ‘Aporte para el Conocimiento de la Casa Urbana y Rústica en la Época Colonial’, Boletín del Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, pp. 320-328. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, FFyL, UBA.
92. Torre Revello, J. (1934) ‘Arquitectura Virreinal’, Estudios y Documentos para la Historia del Arte Colonial. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, FFyL, UBA.
93. Torre Revello, J. (1957) ‘La Vivienda en el Buenos Aires Antiguo: Desde los Orígenes Hasta los Comienzos del Siglo XIX’, Anales del Instituto de Arte Americano, FADU-UBA 10: 84-125.
94. Wade, P. (1994) ‘Representation and Power: Blacks in Colombia’, in G.C. Bond and A. Gilliam (eds) The Social Construction of the Past, Representation as Power, pp. 59-73. London: Routledge.
95. Waisman, M. (1997) Arquitectura Colonial Argentina. Buenos Aires: Summa.
96. Warnier, J.P. (2001) ‘A Praxeological Approach to Subjectivation in a Material World’, Journal of Material Culture 6(1): 5-24.
97. Zarankin, A. (1994) Arqueología Histórica en Santa Fe la Vieja. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
98. Zarankin, A. (1997) Vivienda Familiar y Sistema Capitalista: Una Lectura Arqueol, unpublished Master's thesis (FADU-UBA), Buenos Aires.
99. Zarankin, A. (1999a) ‘Casa Tomada: Sistema, Poder y Vivienda Familiar’, in A.
100. Zarankin and F. Acuto (eds) Sed non Satiata: Teoría Social en la Arqueología Latinoamericana Contemporánea, pp. 239-72. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Del Tridente.
101. Zarankin, A. (1999b) ‘Arqueología de la Arquitectura: Another Brick on the Wall’, in P.P.A. Funari, E.G. Neves and I. Podgorny (eds) Anais da Primeira Reunião de Teoria Arqueológica na América do Sul, pp. 119-128. São Paulo: MAE/USP/FAPESP.
102. Zarankin, A. (2001) ‘Paredes que Domesticam: Arqueologia da Arquitetura Escolar Capitalista: o Caso de Buenos Aires’, unpublished PhD Thesis, UNICAMP, Campinas.
103. Zarankin, A. (2002) ‘“ Walls of Domestication”: Archaeology of Architecture of Capitalist Elementary Schools. The Case of Buenos Aires’, in P.P.A. Funari, A.
104. Zarankin and E. Stovel (eds) Archaeological Theory in Action (in prep).
105. Senatore, S. Guillermo, (1998) ‘Arqueología Histórica de Buenos Aires Informe de los resultados del Proyecto “Casa Mínima”, Barrio de San Telmo’, Palimpsesto 5: 193-202.