On archaeological praxis, gender bias and indigenous peoples in South America

Journal of Social Archaeology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 90-107

  Politis, Gustavo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL CENTRO DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

archaeological socio politics; gender archaeology; reburial issues; South America

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992897614     PISSN: 14696053     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/146960530100100107     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Barre, M.C. (1983) Ideologías Indigenistas y Movimientos Indios. México: Siglo XXI Editores.
2. Bellelli, C., M. Berón and V. Scheinsohn (1994) ‘Gender and Science: Demystifying Argentine Archeology’, in M.C. Nelson, S.M. Nelson and A. Wylie (eds) Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association (Archaeological Papers 5).
3. Bourdieu, P. (1976) ‘Le Champs Scientifique’, Actes de la Reserche en Sciences Sociales 2-3: 88-104.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1990) ‘Les Conditions Sociales de la Circulacion Internationale des Idées’, Romanitische Zeitschrift fur Literaturgeschichte/Cahiers d’historie des littératures romanes 14(1-2): 1-10.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1992) ‘Deux Impérialismes de l’Universel’, in C. Fauré and T. Bishop (eds) L’Amérique des Francais, pp. 149-55. Paris: Ed. Francois Bourin.
6. Contreras, J., ed. (1988) La Cara India, la Cruz del 92. Identidad Etnica y Movimientos Campesinos. Madrid: Editorial Revolución.
7. Curtoni, R. and M.L. Endere (2000) Patrimionio, Arqueología y Participación: Acerca de la Noción de Paisaje Arqueológico. Paper presented at the Segunda Reunion Internacional de Teoría Arqueológica. Olavarría, 4-7 October 2000.
8. Endere, M.L. (1998) Collections of Indigenous Human Remains in Argentina: The Issue of Claiming a National Heritage. Masters dissertation. Institute of Archaeology. University College London.
9. Fforde, C. (1997) Controlling the Dead: An Analysis of the Collecting and Repatriation of Aboriginal Humans Remains. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Southampton.
10. Funari, P. (1992) ‘Arqueología en Brasil: Política y Academia en la Encrucijada’, in G. Politis (ed.) Arqueología en America Latina Hoy, pp. 57-69. Bogotá: Fondo de Promoción de la Cultura del Banco Popular.
11. Gathercole, P. and D. Lowenthal (1989) The Politics of the Past. London: Unwin Hyman.
12. Gero, J. (1991) ‘Genderlithics: Women's Roles in Stone Tool Production’, in JM. Gero and M.W. Conkey (eds), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, pp. 163-193. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
13. Gero, J. (1996) ‘Archaeological Practice and Gendered Encounters with Field Data’, in R. Wright (ed.) Gender and Archaeology, pp. 251-280. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14. Gero, J. (1999) ‘La Iconografía Recuay y el Estudio de Género’, Gaceta Arqueológica Andina 25: 23-44.
15. Gero, J., D. Lacy and M. Blackey, eds (1983) The Socio-Politics of Archaeology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
16. Gero, J. and D. Root (1991) ‘Public Presentations and Private Concerns: Archaeology in the Pages of National Geographic’, in P. Gathercole and D. Lowenthal (eds) The Politics of the Past, pp. 19-37. One World Archaeology Series. London: Unwin-Hyman.
17. Gnecco, C. (1995) ‘Praxis Científica en la Periferia: Notas Para una Historia Social de la Arqueología Colombiana’, Revista Española de Antropología Americana 25: 9-22.
18. Gnecco, C. (1999) Multivocalidad Historica. Hacia una Cartografia Poscolonial de la Arqueología. Santa Fé de Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
19. González, S. (1993) Mujeres y Relaciones de Género en la Antropología Latino-americana. México: El Colegio de México.
20. Hastorf, C. (1991) ‘Gender, Space and Food in Prehistory’, in J. Gero and M.W. Conkey (eds) Engendering Archaeology, pp. 132-162. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Hodder, I. (1999) The Archaeological Process. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Hubert, J. (1989) ‘A Proper Place for the Dead: A Critical Review of the “Reburial” Issue’, in R. Layton (ed.) Conflict in the Archaelogy of Living Traditions, pp. 131-166. London: Unwin Hyman.
23. Hubert, J. (1992) ‘Dry Bones or Living Ancestors? Conflictive Perception of Life, Death and the Universe’, International Journal of Cultural Property 1: 105-127.
24. Hyslop, J. (1984) The Inka Road System. New York: Academic Press.
25. Jameson, F. (1984) ‘Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism’, New Left Review 146: 53-92.
26. Jones, S. (1997) The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge.
27. Lanata, J.L. and L. Borrero (1999) ‘The Archaeology of Hunter-Gatherers in South America: Recent History and New Directions’, in G. Politis and B. Alberti (eds) Archaeology in Latin America, pp. 76-89. London: Routledge.
28. Layton, R., ed. (1989a) Who Needs the Past? Indigenous Values and Archaeology. London: Unwin Hyman.
29. Layton, R. (1989b) Conflict in the Archaeology of Living Traditions. London: Unwin Hyman.
30. López, M. del P. (1997) ‘Antropología y Género en Colombia’, Informes Antropológicos 9: 11-40.
31. Lumbreras, L. (1974) La Arqueología como Ciencia Social. Lima.
32. Mamami Condorí, C. (1989) ‘History and Prehistory in Bolivia: What about the Indians?’, in R. Layton (ed.) Conflict in the Archaeology of Living Traditions, pp. 46-59. London: Unwin Hyman.
33. McGuire, R. (1991) Marxist Archaeology. New York: Academic Press.
34. McGuire, R. and R. Navarrete (1999) ‘Entre Motocicletas y Fusiles: Las Arqueologías Radicales Anglosajona e Hispana’, Revista do Museu de Arquelogia e Etnologia, Suplemento 3: 181-99.
35. Mesa Redonda (1999) ‘Hallazgos Arqueológicos, Entre la Ciencia y la Identidad’, Andes 10: 245-8.
36. Miller, D. and C. Tilley (1984) ‘Ideology, Power and Prehistory: An Introduction’, in D. Miller and C. Tilley (eds) Ideology, Power and Prehistory, pp. 1-16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Ontiveros Yulquila, A. (1988) ‘Hacia la Consolidación de la Indianidad’, in J. Contreras (ed.) La Cara India, la Cruz del 92. Identidad Etnica y Movimientos Indios, pp. 185-94. Madrid: Editorial Revolución.
38. Oyuela-Caycedo, A. (1991) ‘Ideology and Structure of Gender Spaces: The Case of the Kaggaba Indians’, in D. Walde and N. Willows (eds) The Archaeology of Gender, pp. 327-335. Chacmool, Alberta: The Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.
39. Oyuela-Caycedo, A., A. Anaya, C.G. Elera and L.M. Valdez (1997) ‘Social Archaeology in Latin America? Comments to T.C. Patterson’, American Antiquity 62(2): 365-374.
40. Patterson, T.C. (1994) ‘Social Archaeology in Latin America: An appreciation’, American Antiquity 53: 1-7.
41. Podgorny I. and G. Politis (1992) ‘Que Sucedió en la Historia? Los esqueletos araucanos del Museo de La Plata y la Conquista del Desierto’, Arqueología Contemporánea 3: 73-9.
42. Politis, G. (1995) ‘The Socio-Politics of the Development of Archaeology in Hispanic South America’, in P. Ucko (ed.) Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective, pp. 197-235. London: Routledge.
43. Reinhard, J. (1996) ‘Peru's Ice Maidens. Unwrapping the Secrets’, National Geographic 189 (6): 64-89.
44. Reinhard, J. (1998) ‘Research Update: New Inca Mummies’, National Geographic 194 (1): 128-135.
45. Reinhard, J. (1999) ‘A 6,700 metros Niños Incas Sacrificados Quedaron Congelados en el Tiempo’, National Geographic(edición en español) 195 (5): 36-55.
46. Schobinger, J. (1986) ‘La Red de Santuarios de Alta Montaña en el Contisuyo y el Collasuyo: Evaluación General, Problemas Interpretativos’, Comechimgonia. Numero Especial: El Imperio Inka 297-317.
47. Schobinger, J. (1999) ‘Los Santuarios de Altura Incaicos y el Aconcagua: Aspectos Generales Interpretativos’, Relaciones 24: 7-28
48. Silverblatt, I. (1987) Moon, Sun and Witches. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Slavsky, L. (1992) ‘Los Indígenas y la Sociedad Nacional. Apuntes sobre Políticas Indigenistas en la Argentina’, in A. Balazote and J. Radovich (eds) La Problemática Indígena. Estudios Antropológicos sobre Pueblos Indígenas en Argentina, pp. 67-79. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.
50. Shanks, M. and C. Tilley (1987a) Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
51. Shanks, M. and C. Tilley (1987b) Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Trigger, B. (1984) ‘Alternative Archaeologies: Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist’, Man 19: 355-370.
53. Ucko, P. (1975) ‘Review of AIAS activities. 1974’, AIAS Newsletter 3: 6-17.
54. Ucko, P. (1983) ‘Australian Academic Archaeology: Aboriginal Transformation of its Aims and Practices’, Australian Archaeology 16: 11-26.
55. Wylie, A. (1991) ‘The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender’, American Antiquity 57: 15-35.