Magnetic resonance imaging in inflammatory rheumatoid diseases

Reumatologia

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 170-176

  Sudot Szopińska, Iwona ^a   Mróz, Joanna ^a   Ostrowska, Monika ^a   Kwiatkowska, Brygida ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GERIATRICS   (Poland)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; MRI protocol; Rheumatic inflammatory diseases; Rheumatoid arthritis

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; MAGNET; MEDICAL HISTORY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; RHEUMATIC DISEASE; RHEUMATOLOGY; SYNOVITIS;

EID: 84990209991     PISSN: 00346233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5114/reum.2016.62471     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, et al. The assessment of SpondyloArtritis internationalSociety (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68;1-44.
2. Sudot-Szopinska I, Jurik AG, Eshed I, et al. Recommendations of the ESSR Arthritis Subcommittee for the use of magnetic resonance Imaging in musculoskeletal rheumatic diseases. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2015;19:396-411.
3. https://www.bruker.com/fileadmin/user-upload/8-PDF-Docs/MagneticResonance/MRI/brochures/152-11-mouse-T138908.pdf
4. Cosmos TC, Parizh M. Advances in whole-body MRI magnets. IEEE Trans ApplIied Superconductivity 2011:21;2014-2019.
5. Eshed I, Krabbe S, Østergaard M, et al. Influence of field strength, coil type and image resolution on assessment of synovitis by unenhanced MRI-a comparison with contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 2015;25:1059-1067.
6. Østergaard M, Duer A, Moller U, Ejbjerg B. Magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral joints in rheumatic diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2004;18:861-879.
7. Freeston JE, Bird P Conaghan G. The role of MRI in rheumatoid arthritis: research and clinical issues. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2009;21:95-101.
8. Narvaez JA, Narvaez J, De Lama E, De Alben M. MR imaging of early rheumatoid arthritis. RadioGraphics 2010;30;143-163.
9. Axelsen R, Axelsen MB, Ejbjerg BJ, et al. Differentiation between early rheumaroid arthritis patients nd healthy persons by conventional and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Scand J Rheumatol 2014;43:109-118.
10. Stomp W, Krabben A, van der Hoijde D, et al. Aiming for a simpler early arthritis MRI protocol: can Gd contrast administration be eliminated? Eur Radiol 2015;25:1520-1527.
11. Stomp W, Krabben A, van der Hoijde D, et al. Aiming for a shorter rheumatoid arthritis MRI protocol: can contrast-enhanced MRI replace T2 for the detection of bone marrow edema? Eur Radiol 2014;24:2614-2622.
12. Morelli JN, Runge VM, Attenberger U, et al. An Image-based Approach to Understanding the Physics of MR Artifacts. RadioGraphics 2011;31:849-866.
13. Hodgson RJ, O'Connor P Moots R. MRI of rheumatoid arthritis-image quantification for the assessment of disease activity, progression and response to therapy. Rheumatology 2008;47:13-21.
14. Singh DR, Chin MSM, Peh WCG. Artifacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2014;18:12-22.
15. Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP. MR artifacts, safety, and quality control. RadioGraphics 2006;26:275-297.
16. Dill T. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 2008;94;943-948;
17. Link TM. Osteoporosis imaging: state of the art and advanced imaging. Radiology 2012;263:3-17.
18. Stoller DW (ed.). Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine. 3rd Edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2007;1997-2042.