Patient values and preferences on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement therapy for aortic stenosis: a systematic review

BMJ Open

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2016, Pages

  Lytvyn, Lyubov ^a   Guyatt, Gordon H ^b   Manja, Veena ^b,c,d   Siemieniuk, Reed A ^b,e   Zhang, Yuan ^b   Agoritsas, Thomas ^b,f   Vandvik, Per O ^g,h  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^d VA WESTERN NEW YORK HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^h INNLANDET HOSPITAL TRUST   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990209634     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2016-014327     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ross J, Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation 1968;38(1 Suppl):61-7.
2. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1231-43.
3. Osnabrugge RL, Mylotte D, Head SJ, et al. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1002-12.
4. Turina J, Hess O, Sepulcri F, et al. Spontaneous course of aortic valve disease. Eur Heart J 1987;8:471-83.
5. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis first human case description. Circulation 2002;106:3006-8.
6. Perera S, Wijesinghe N, Ly E, et al. Outcomes of patients with untreated severe aortic stenosis in real-world practice. N Z Med J 2011;124:40-8.
7. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:e57-e185.
8. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2187-98.
9. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1609-20.
10. Gargiulo G, Sannino A, Capodanno D, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:334-44.
11. Alonso-Coello P, Montori VM, Díaz MG, et al. Values and preferences for oral antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: physician and patient perspectives. Health Expect 2015;18:2318-27.
12. Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: clinical practice guidelines. BMJ 2016;353:i2089.
13. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) 2014. CASP Checklists. Oxford: CASP. http://www.casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists
14. Agoritsas T, Heen AF, Brandt L, et al. Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens. BMJ 2015;350:g7624.
15. Hussain AI, Garratt AM, Brunborg C, et al. Eliciting patient risk willingness in clinical consultations as a means of improving decision-making of aortic valve replacement. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e002828.
16. Lauck SB, Baumbusch J, Achtem L, et al. Factors influencing the decision of older adults to be assessed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an exploratory study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Published Online First: 23 Oct 2015. doi: 10.1177/1474515115612927
17. Hussain AI, Garratt AM, Beitnes JO, et al. Validity of standard gamble utilities in patients referred for aortic valve replacement. Qual Life Res 2016;25:1703-12.
18. Lewis EF, Johnson PA, Johnson W, et al. Preferences for quality of life or survival expressed by patients with heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001;20:1016-24.
19. Singer LG, Theodore J, Gould MK. Validity of standard gamble utilities as measured by transplant readiness in lung transplant candidates. Med Decis Making 2003;23:435-40.
20. Steffens NM, Tucholka JL, Nabozny MJ, et al. Engaging patients, health care professionals, and community members to improve preoperative decision making for older adults facing high-risk surgery. JAMA Surg Published Online First: 29 Jun 2016. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1308