Eliciting patient risk willingness in clinical consultations as a means of improving decision-making of aortic valve replacement

Journal of the American Heart Association

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Hussain, Amjad I ^a   Garratt, Andrew M ^b   Brunborg, Cathrine ^c   Aakhus, Svend ^a,d   Gullestad, Lars ^a   Pettersen, Kjell I ^a  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

^c OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Cardiovascular diseases; Patients; Shared decision making; Surgery; Valves

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EUROQOL-VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HOSPITAL ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION SCALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASS; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHORT FORM 36; SYMPTOM; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUDIOVISUAL AID; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DEVICES; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; INTERVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; AUDIOVISUAL AIDS; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 85006226062     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20479980     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002828     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP III, Guyton RA, O'Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM III, Thomas JD. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:e521-e643.
2. Green C, Brazier J, Deverill M. Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17:151-165.
3. Gafni A. The standard gamble method: what is being measured and how it is interpreted. Health Serv Res. 1994;29:207-224.
4. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care. 1996;34:702-722.
5. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to Score Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey: (Standard & Acute Forms). Lincolm, RI: QualityMetric Inc.; 2000.
6. Falcoz PE, Chocron S, Mercier M, Puyraveau M, Etievent JP. Comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and the 36-item health survey questionnaires in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1222-1228.
7. Torrance GW, Feeny D, Furlong W. Visual analog scales: do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Med Decis Making. 2001;21:329-334.
8. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences- II: scaling methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:459-471.
9. Herrmann C. International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res. 1997;42:17-41.
10. Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Spertus JA. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1245-1255.
11. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Prodzinski J, McDonell M, Fihn SD. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:333-341.
12. Campeau L. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris revisited 30 years later. Can J Cardiol. 2002;18:371-379.
13. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:1440-1463.
14. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15:167-184.
15. Shafazand S, Goldstein MK, Doyle RL, Hlatky MA, Gould MK. Health-related quality of life in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2004;126:1452-1459.
16. Singer LG, Theodore J, Gould MK. Validity of standard gamble utilities as measured by transplant readiness in lung transplant candidates. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:435-440.
17. Nease RF Jr, Kneeland T, O'Connor GT, Sumner W, Lumpkins C, Shaw L, Pryor D, Sox HC. Variation in patient utilities for outcomes of the management of chronic stable angina. Implications for clinical practice guidelines. Ischemic Heart Disease Patient Outcomes Research Team. JAMA. 1995;273:1185-1190.
18. Dweck MR, Boon NA, Newby DE. Calcific aortic stenosis: a disease of the valve and the myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1854-1863.
19. Carabello BA, Paulus WJ. Aortic stenosis. Lancet. 2009;373:956-966.
20. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D. Health utility estimation. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2002;2:99-108.
21. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453-458.
22. McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:1259-1262.
23. Hussain AI, Garratt AM, Beitnes JO, Gullestad L, Pettersen KI. Validity of standard gamble utilities in patients referred for aortic valve replacement. Qual Life Res. 2015; doi: 10.1007/S 11136-015-1156-1. [Epub ahead of print]
24. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55:68-78.
25. Bach DS, Radeva JI, Birnbaum HG, Fournier AA, Tuttle EG. Prevalence, referral patterns, testing, and surgery in aortic valve disease: leaving women and elderly patients behind? J Heart Valve Dis. 2007;16:362-369.
26. Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G, Messika-Zeitoun D, Delahaye F, Tornos P, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Boersma E, Ravaud P, Vahanian A. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J. 2005;26:2714-2720.
27. Bramstedt KA. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: frequently indicated yet frequently denied. Gerontology. 2003;49:46-49.
28. Reardon MJ, Adams DH, Kleiman NS, Yakubov SJ, Coselli JS, Deeb GM, Gleason TG, Lee JS, Hermiller JB Jr, Chetcuti S, Heiser J, Merhi W, Zorn GL III, Tadros P, Robinson N, Petrossian G, Hughes GC, Harrison JK, Maini B, Mumtaz M, Conte JV, Resar JR, Aharonian V, Pfeffer T, Oh JK, Qiao H, Popma JJ. 2-Year outcomes in patients undergoing surgical or self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:113-121.
29. Haussig S, Linke A. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement indications should be expanded to lower-risk and younger patients. Circulation. 2014;130:2321-2331.
30. Bach DS, Siao D, Girard SE, Duvernoy C, McCallister BD Jr, Gualano SK. Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:533-539.
31. Epstein RM, Peters E. Beyond information: exploring patients' preferences. JAMA. 2009;302:195-197.
32. Schueler R, Hammerstingl C, Sinning JM, Nickenig G, Omran H. Prognosis of octogenarians with severe aortic valve stenosis at high risk for cardiovascular surgery. Heart. 2010;96:1831-1836.