Time, money, and happiness: Does putting a price on time affect our ability to smell the roses?

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue , 2016, Pages 60-64

  Connors, Scott ^a   Khamitov, Mansur ^b   Moroz, Sarah ^c   Campbell, Lorne ^c   Henderson, Claire ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Happiness; Impatience; Money; Replication; Reproducibility; Time

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION; COMPENSATION; HAPPINESS; HUMAN; MONEY; ODOR; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EID: 84989895238     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brandt, M.J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R.,. van ‘t Veer, A., The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 50 (2014), 217–224.
2. Chandler, J., Mueller, P., Paolacci, G., Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods 46 (2014), 112–130.
3. Crump, M.J.C., McDonnell, J.V., Gureckis, T.M., Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PloS One, 8, 2013, e57410.
4. DeVoe, S.E., House, J., Time, money and happiness: How does putting a price on time affect our ability to smell the roses?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48 (2012), 466–474.
5. Fort, K., Adda, G., Cohen, K.B., Amazon Mechanical Turk: Gold mine or coal mine?. Computational Linguistics 37 (2011), 413–420.
6. Koole, S.L., Lakens, D., Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (2012), 608–614.
7. Nosek, B.A., Spies, J.R., Motyl, M., Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (2012), 615–631.
8. Open Science Collaboration. An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (2012), 657–660.
9. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science 23 (2014), 184–188.
10. Rand, D.G., Peysakhovich, A., Kraft-Todd, G.T., Newman, G.E., Wurzbacher, O., Nowak, M.A., Greene, J.D., Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nature Communications, 5, 2014, 3677.
11. Stanley, D.J., Spence, J.R., Expectations for replications: Are yours realistic?. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 (2014), 305–318.
12. Suen, H.K., Ary, D., Analyzing quantitative behavioral observation data. 1989, Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, N.Y.
13. Wagenmakers, E., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., Van der Maas, H., Kievit, R., An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (2012), 632–638.
14. Whillans, A.V., Dunn, E.W., Thinking about time as money decreases environmental behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 127 (2015), 44–52.
15. Young, N.S., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Al-Ubaydli, O., Why current publication practices may distort science. PLoS Medicine 5 (2008), 1418–1422.