Japanese intonation units and syntactic structure

Studies in Language

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 515-564

  Matsumoto, Kazuko ^a  

^a AICHI UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989403381     PISSN: 03784177     EISSN: 15699978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sl.24.3.03mat     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Andersen, Roger W. 1991. A poor man’s guide to interlanguage analysis. Department of TESL and Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.
2. Ashby, William J.; and Bentivoglio, Paola. 1993. “Preferred argument structure in spoken French and Spanish”. Language Variation and Change 5: 61-76.
3. Atkinson, J. Maxwell; and Heritage, John (eds). 1984. Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis. Cambridge: CUP.
4. Beckman, Mary E. 1996. “The parsing of phonology”. Language and Cognitive Processes 11: 17-67.
5. Beckman, Mary E; and Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1986. “Intonational structure in English and Japanese”. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255-310.
6. Bolinger, Dwight. 1989. Intonation and its uses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Brazil, David. 1985. The communicative value of intonation in English. Birmingham: ERL, Birmingham University.
8. Brown, Gillian; and Yule, George. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: CUP.
9. Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. “Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view”. In: Li, Charles and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds), Subject and topic 27-55. New York: Academic Press.
10. Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.). 1980a. The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Chafe, Wallace L. 1980b. “The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative”. In: Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production, 9-50. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Chafe, Wallace L. 1987. “Cognitive constraints on information flow”. In Tomlin, Russell (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse 21-51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Chafe, Wallace L. 1988. “Linking intonation units in spoken English”. In: Haiman, John; and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds), Clause combining in grammar and discourse 1-27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Chafe, Wallace L. 1993. “Prosodic and functional units of language”. In: Edwards, J.A.; and Lampert, M. D. (eds), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research 33-43. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Chafe, Wallace L. 1996. “How consciousness shapes language”. Pragmatics and Cognition 4: 35-54.
17. Clancy, Patricia. 1980. “Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse”. In: Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production 127-202. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Clancy, Patricia. 1982. “Written and spoken style in Japanese narratives”. In: Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy 55-76. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Clancy, Patricia; Thompson, Sandra A.; Suzuki, Ryoko; and Tao, Honyin. 1996. “The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin”. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 55-87.
20. Comrie, Bernard. 1978. “Ergativity” In: Lehmann, Winifred P. (ed.), Syntactic typology 329-394. Austin: University of Texas Press.
21. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth; and Selting, Margaret (eds). 1996. Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: CUP.
22. Croft, William. 1995. “Intonation units and grammatical structure”. Linguistics 33: 839-882.
23. Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.
24. Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.
25. Crystal, David. 1975. The English tone of voice. London: St. Martin.
26. Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. “Ergativity”. Language 55: 59-138.
27. Du Bois, John W. 1980. “Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse”. In: Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production 203-274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. Du Bois, John W. 1987. “The discourse basis of ergativity”. Language 63: 805-855.
29. Du Bois, John W.; Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan; Paolino, Danae; and Cumming, Sussana. 1992. Discourse transcription: Santa Barbara papers in linguistics vol. 4. Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.
30. Du Bois, John W.; Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan; Cumming, Sussana; and Paolino, Danae. 1993. “Outline of discourse transcription”. In: Edwards, J. A.; and Lampert, M. D. (eds), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research 45-89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Edwards, Jane A.; and Lampert, Martin D. (eds). 1993. Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Ford, Cecilia E.; and Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. “Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion”. In: Ochs, E.; Schegloff, E. A.; and Thompson, S.A. (eds), Interaction and grammar 134-184. Cambridge: CUP.
33. Ford, Cecilia E.; Fox, Barbara A.; and Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. “Practices in the construction of turns: The “TCU” revisited”. Pragmatics 6: 427-454.
34. Fox, Barbara A.; Hayashi, Makoto; and Jaspersen, Robert. 1996. “Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair”. In: Ochs, E.; Schegloff, E. A.; and Thompson, S.A. (eds), Interaction and grammar 185-237. Cambridge: CUP.
35. Givon, Talmy. 1975. “Focus and the scope of assertion: Some Bantu evidence”. Studies in African Linguistics 6: 185-205.
36. Givon, Talmy. 1984. Syntax I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. Givon, Talmy. 1990. Syntax II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967a. Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
39. Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967b. “Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2”. Journal of Linguistics 3: 199-244.
40. Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
41. Hinds, John; Iwasaki, Shoichi; and Maynard, Senko K. (eds). 1987. Perspectives on topicalization: The case of Japanese WA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. “The structure of the intonation unit in Japanese”. In: Choi, S. (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics vol. 3: 39-53. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Iwasaki, Shoichi; and Tao, Hongyin. 1993. “A comparative analysis of the intonation unit in English, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese”. Paper presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles, California.
44. Kohri, Shiro. 1995. “Intoneeshon [Intonation]”. Nihongogaku [Studies in Japanese] 14: 30-38.
45. Kreckel, Marga. 1981. “Tone units as message blocks in natural discourse: Segmentation of face-to-face interaction by naive, native speakers”. Journal ofPragmatics 5: 459-476.
46. Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. The intonationalphonology. Cambridge: CUP.
48. Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1995. “Fragmentation in conversational Japanese”. Japan Association for Language Teaching Journal 17: 238-253.
49. Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1996. Intonation units in conversational Japanese: Structure and linkage. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
50. Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1997a. “NPs in Japanese conversation”. Pragmatics 7: 163-181.
51. Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1997b. “Independent phrasal intonation units in conversational discourse”. The Bulletin ofAichi University of Education 46: 29-36.
52. Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1997c. “Postposing in Japanese discourse”. Studies in Foreign Languages and Literature 33: 79-88.
53. Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1998a. “Detached NPs in Japanese conversation: Types and functions”. Text 18: 417-444.
54. Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1998b. “On the ‘one new NP per unit’ constraint in spoken Japanese”. The Bulletin of Aichi University of Education 47: 17-25.
55. Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1999. “Intonation units and functional composition in Japanese conversational discourse”. Functions ofLanguage 6: 163-194.
56. Matsumoto, Kazuko. 2000. “Intonation units, clauses and preferred argument structure in conversational Japanese”. Language Sciences 22: 63-86.
57. Matsumoto, Kazuko. To appear. Intonation units in Japanese conversation: Syntactic, informational, and functional structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58. Maynard, Senko K. 1989. Japanese conversation: Self-contexualization through structure and interactional management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
59. Nespor, Marina; and Vogel, Irene. 1983. “Prosodic structures above the word”. In: Cutler, A.; and Ladd, D. R. (eds), Prosody: Models and measurements 123-140. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
60. Ono, Tsuyoshi; and Thompson, Sandra A. 1994. “Unattached NPs in English conversation”. Berkeley Linguistic Society 20: 402-419.
61. Pawley, Andrew; and Syder, Frances H. 1983. “Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar”. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 551-579.
62. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
63. Pierrehumbert, Janet B.; and Beckman, Mary. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Pierrehumbert, Janet B.; and Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. “The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse”. In: Cohen, P. R.; Morgan, J.; and Pollack, M. E. (eds), Intentions in communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: CUP.
66. Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan. 1994. Prosody, syntax, and discourse pragmatics: Assessing information flow in German conversation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
67. Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan; Shapley, Marian; and Weber, Elizabeth. 1991. “Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses.” Language and Speech 34: 207-234.
68. Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The languages of Japan. Cambridge: CUP.
70. Smith, Wendy. 1996. “Spoken narratives and preferred clause structure: Evidence from modern Hebrew discourse”. Studies in Language 20: 163-189.
71. Sugito, Miyoko. 1989. Nihongo to Nihongo kyoiku [Japanese and teaching Japanese] vol. 2. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
72. Sugito, Miyoko. 1990. Nihongo to Nihongo kyoiku [Japanese and teaching Japanese] vol. 3. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
73. Svartvik, Jan. 1982. “The segmentation of impromptu speech”. In: Enkvist, N. E. (ed.), Impromptu speech: A symposium, 131-145. Abo, Finland: Abo Akademi.
74. Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units in Mandarin conversation: Prosody discourse, and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
75. Vandepitte, Sonia. 1989. “Pragmatic function of intonation: Tone and cognitive environment”. Lingua 79: 265-297.